215 West 43
Street
New York
City, NY 10036
212.840.7111 ~ fax: 212.719.5922
dvf@sai2000.org ~ www.sai2000.org
CEA
Self-Study
March 1, 2012
Once all
information is in the report, to ensure that it is complete and communicates
effectively to all readers, review the final copy, and confirm the following:
All parts of the template have
been completed, including all Part III.A required responses.
Information is presented clearly
and concisely.
Document titles are accurate.
All documents referenced as in the
report (B.1 documentation) are included, and all hyperlinks function.
The report has been edited and
proofread.
When
satisfied that the report is complete, submit a copy to CEA according to the Timeline for Scheduling Site Visits and
Reviews. If there are parts or subparts or materials missing, if
clarification is required, or if it is difficult to find documentation, CEA
staff will request that changes be made before the report is approved. With approval of the report, CEA
will provide instructions and timelines for scheduling a site visit.
Table of Contents
Template for the Self Study Report
Preparing the self-study report:
Part
I.
Overview of the Program or Language Institution
Part
II.
The Self Study Process
Part
III. Responses
to CEA Standards
Facilities, Equipment, and Supplies
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity
Professional Development Policy
Professional Development Policy
Professional Development Policy
Length and Structure of Program of Study
Program Development, Planning, and Review
Part
V. Indices
of Supporting Documents
A.
Program
description
The
Spanish-American Institute was founded in 1955. The school’s mission
responds to the needs of its changing student population. The Institute
originally provided communicative adult basic English language training to
newly arrived immigrants primarily from the Spanish-speaking Americas.
The Institute responded to their additional need for job-entry office skills by
adding career-training courses such as stenography, typing, and bookkeeping.
While the school now draws its student body from all over the world, it
continues to provide English language preparation as an end in itself, as
preparation for further academic study in an English language environment, and
as an integral component of workplace preparation.
The
ESL Plus Course of Study offers six levels of English Language instruction, as
well as a pre-level I course on basic literacy. Courses are designed for open entry-open exit. Thus, courses are continuously offered
with students continuously enrolling. The levels of ESL emphasize progressively
higher order communication skills and more complex use of language.
Students, therefore, progress through these courses in sequential order in
accordance with generally accepted standards of good practice. For
example, the Institute’s six-level ESL sequence follows language learning
outcomes generally expected of low beginner (ESL 1), beginner/high beginner
(ESL 2), low intermediate (ESL 3), intermediate (ESL 4), high intermediate (ESL
5), and advanced ESL (ESL 6).
B.
Faculty
The
Institute’s multilingual, English proficient faculty is sensitive to the
particular needs of students in a new country, a new culture, and new language
environment. Faculty members meets ACICS requirements and have New York
State Education Department licenses to teach in their respective discipline(s)
at a registered business school. Faculty with degrees from other countries have
had their credentials formally evaluated by a NCAES member organization in accordance
with ACICS guidelines. General requirements include:
·
bachelor’s degree or above;
·
transcripts or diploma’s formally evaluated for US equivalency by a
NACES credential evaluation agency such as Josef Silny and Associates, Inc., International
Education Consultants World Education Services;
·
license to teach ESL from the State of New York Education Department;
·
orientation training from the President and Dean of Academic Affairs at
Spanish-American Institute.
C.
Student services
The
Dean of Students and support staff provide assistance regarding course
placement and scheduling, academic progress, and job placement. The
Institute's Counseling Plan describes
the following specific guidance services:
• Identification of "at
risk" students through academic progress and attendance tracking in
conjunction with administrative review of all bi-monthly and final grades.
• One-on-one orientation and
progress conferences.
• Academic warning
notification and referral for in-school support to help with academic problems.
The
student's orientation program begins with the admissions interview.
Prospective students receive a copy of the School
Catalog and an invitation to tour the school facility. They also
receive one-on-one information about program alternatives and
requirements.
In
2001, the school developed a weekly tracking system through which faculty
indicate student's academic progress on the weekly attendance report. Should
the student not progress in a reasonable amount of time, the faculty member
spends additional time with the student to determine the nature of the problem
and, if need be, refers the student to the Dean of Student Services or a
designated Faculty Student-Services Associate.
Lastly,
several facilities are provided for students to further study, research,
collaborate, and relax. These
include: Student Lounge, Founders
‘English Through the Arts’ Special Events Center and Library/Information
Commons to relax and collaborate with peers is also in place.
D.
Administration
The Institute has four administrative
officers—a President, a Dean of Students, a Dean of Administrative
Services, and a Dean of Academic Affairs.
Under
the Dean of Academic Affairs there is the Intensive English Language (IEL)
Division. There are three Department Chairs under the IEL Division. IEL
Department Chairs are primarily responsible for assuring the English language
outcomes objectives of ESL and non-ESL courses through curriculum development,
instructional practices, and academic outcomes assessment.
E.
Other (If a multisite institution, state
what functions are conducted by a central administrative
office.)
NA
- this is not a multisite institution.
A.
Name of coordinator
Dr. Carolyn Prager, Dean of Academic Affairs (7/11- 11/11)
Dante V. Ferraro, President (interim acting, 12/11-present)
B.
Names and positions of committee
members
A Steering Committee was
formed July 2011. Members of the
Steering committee include:
Dante V. Ferraro, President
Paul Schiffman, Dean of
Students
Thomas S. Schwenke, Dean of
Administrative Services
Dr. Carolyn Prager, Dean of
Academic Affairs and Self-Study Coordinator (Resigned in 11/2011)
Christina M. Cavage, Private
ESL Consultant
C.
How Information was gathered,
disseminated and analyzed
Information for the
self-study was gathered through committee work, Institutional Effectiveness
Plan, previous self-study work and the assistance of an outside
consultant. Information was
disseminated through the Academic Affairs Office and presented and analyzed
through committee discussions, general faculty meetings, one-on-one faculty
meetings, meeting minutes, memos as well as the CEA Folder in Faculty Matters
on the Spanish-American Institute website. (See Faculty
Meeting & Workshop Minutes, CEA
Self-Study Steering& Standards Committees).
D.
Benefits of self study
The
benefits to the students at SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE in regards to the
Self-Study are quite numerous. The
process has allowed us to take a deeper look at the Institution, its’ policies
and procedures and most of all how we measure and assess student learning and
achievement. Through the study,
several changes have already been made and many more are to follow.
Mission
1: The program or language institution has a written statement of its mission
and goals, which guides activities, policies, and allocation of resources. This statement is communicated to
faculty, students, and staff, as well as to prospective students, student
sponsors, and the public, and is evaluated periodically.
A. Required responses
1. State the
mission of the program or language institution.
Mission Statement of the Spanish American-Institute
The Spanish-American Institute’s
mission is to provide effective conversational English language and business
skills training to individuals seeking entry-level office employment, job
advancement, further studies or personal and cultural enrichment.
2. Briefly
explain how the mission is achieved through the program’s or language
institution’s educational and service programs.
The
mission of the Spanish American Institute drives all curricular, policy and
student support decisions. The
mission is achieved through the course offerings in the ESL Plus Course of
Study. Courses have been created
and revised to provide quality instruction in English. Quality instruction is measured both
through the achievement of student learning outcomes and teacher evaluation.
The
2009-2014 Institutional Effectiveness
Plan (IEP) reflects the following five objectives for the Spanish-American
Institute to implement our mission:
1. To provide student-centered curriculum and instruction
accommodating the needs of students for whom the first language is not English
by:
· developing English and
career courses and programs according to best practices within an ESL
environment;
· implementing career and
English language course and program designs most appropriate to students whose
first language is not English;
· providing faculty development
consistent with new curriculum and materials and best practices; and
· assessing student academic
progress in English as well as content learning.
2. To support effective
teaching and learning through appropriate facilities, equipment, and faculty services by:
·
providing the same quality of service to faculty and students in day
and evening classes;
·
providing hardware and courseware to support instruction; and
·
developing and maintaining facilities and services appropriate to urban
commuter students from diverse backgrounds.
3. To support and advance student retention by:
·
monitoring indicators of academic performance related to retention and
·
providing student activities geared to urban adult commuter students
from diverse backgrounds whose first language is not English.
4. To support and advance student placement and graduate satisfaction by:
·
surveying current and former students and
·
providing on-demand student placement services.
5. To provide activities that
support and advance employer
satisfaction by:
§
soliciting the input of the school’s Advisory Board and
§
conducting outreach to and obtaining feedback from actual and local
potential employers.
3. Briefly
explain how the mission guides the development of policies and the allocation
of resources.
The
mission is the most important conceptual document at the Institute. It outlines, defines and directs all
decisions and actions. Thus it is
the role of the Institution to provide the resources needed to accomplish its
mission, including but not limited to—
•
curricular development and modifications;
•
facilities conducive to teaching and learning;
•
instructional support such as a stand-alone library and multi-media
resources; and
•
academic leadership through a Dean of Academic Affairs and department
chair people.
The
Institute's financial statements and history of uninterrupted course delivery
and student services since 1955 clearly demonstrates that it consistently has
had adequate financial resources to securely deliver its educational programs
and services.
4. State
where the mission statement is made available to the following audiences:
Audience |
Where mission statement
is available |
prospective faculty and
staff |
Website and published
materials as the catalog and faculty handbook. |
current faculty and
staff |
On desktops, bulletin
boards, website and published materials as the catalog and the faculty
handbook. |
prospective students or
their sponsors |
On desktops, bulletin
boards, website and published materials as the catalog. |
current students |
Website, on site
bulletin boards and published materials as the catalog. |
the public |
Website and published
materials as the catalog. |
5. State when
the current mission statement was written or last revised, and state the process
and timeline for periodic evaluation of the mission statement.
The
mission was recently updated in 2011 as a result of the self-study for
CEA. The mission is continually
evaluated due to our current ACICS accreditation. This accreditation requires a self-study for reaccreditation
every four years. Furthermore,
every five years an Institutional Effectiveness Plan is developed to outline a
plan to ensure our mission is being met.
A critical component of this plan is to revisit the mission statement
and it’s effectiveness. It is the Institute’s understanding that the mission
statement is at the heart of the institution. As our institution changes to adapt to student needs’, the
mission statement must also change.
B. Verification
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
The
Institution will develop a practice and policy to formally link strategic
planning, governance, and decision making to ESL Plus Course of Study student
learning outcomes to ensure that the mission is being carried out. March 2013.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Curriculum
Standard 1: The curriculum is consistent with the mission of the program or language
institution, appropriate to achieve the organization’s goals and meet assessed
student needs, and available in writing.
A. Required responses
1. State the
program’s or language institution’s mission, describe how it guides
instruction, and describe how it aligns with the education program
(curriculum). If more than one
education program (curriculum) is offered, address each in the response.
The Spanish-American Institute’s mission is to provide effective
conversational English language and business skills training to individuals
seeking entry-level office employment, job advancement, further studies or
personal and cultural enrichment.
The mission statement guides and directs instruction through course
goals, objectives and student learning outcomes. Student learning and support
for their learning is at the forefront of the Spanish-American Institute's
mission. Thus, the ESL Plus Course
of Study Curriculum is built around the student learning outcomes that will
move students towards the acquisition of the English language for employment,
further study or personal and cultural enrichment. All courses have clearly stated course goals, objectives and
student learning outcomes that are measurable.
The SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE offers 6 levels of English
instruction. Students are tested
and placed in his/her appropriate level. Students progress through these
courses in sequential order in accordance with best practice policies, i.e.
outcomes measures and assessments.
While each level has it’s own curriculum to meet the student learning
outcomes for that level, each level is aligned with the overall mission, to
provide effective conversational English language skills to non-native speakers.
Needs of the student population are considered when making curricular
changes. One way in which the
institution is able to make changes based on student needs is through the Current Student Survey. The Current Student Survey is completed
by graduates to help evaluate the institution and the courses offered.
Most recently, course outcome statements have been generated for all
ESL course offerings, and have been endorsed by the faculty and
administration. In order to better
meet and assess these new course outcomes faculty recently participated in a
professional development workshop on blended learning. The workshop was a result of the
changing population in the ESL field.
Due to the large number of students who are digital natives, the demand
to use more progressive and innovative tools in and out of the classroom has
grown tremendously. As a result of
this emerging population, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE has decided to incorporate
a web-based tool into their ESL courses.
MyEnglishLabs are currently being piloted in Level 4 classes, however,
it is anticipated that by Fall 2012 all levels will be using this new digital
tool to enhance the teaching and learning experience.
2. List the
ways that the curricular needs of the student population sought, enrolled, and
graduated from the program or language institution are established.
____ formal needs assessment project
_x__ surveys of enrolled students
_x__ surveys of students at program exit or completion
_x__ surveys of alumni
_x__ analysis of the needs of employers that employ
program graduates
____ analysis of the needs of colleges/universities that
enroll program graduates
____ analysis of the requirements of specific
college/university departments that enroll program graduates
_x__ analysis of data (such as GPAs, university graduation
rates, etc.) of program graduates
____ other (Complete 3 below.)
3. List other
ways not included in 2 above.
Direct daily contact in school with students by members of
the Board of Directors (i.e. the President, Dante V. Ferraro and Dean of
Student Services, Paul Schiffman).
As well as conversations during day-long Student Club Bike Tours and
lunch with small groups of students and teachers.
4. Briefly
describe how the analyses above inform the design of each education program
(curriculum).
In
the most recent Graduate Student
Placement Questionnaire, students reported a high satisfaction rate with
the overall English instruction they received. However, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE recognizes that the
number of respondents was quite low.
Furthermore, it is also recognized that satisfaction surveys are just as
critical for those learners that were lost due to attrition. Thus, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE has
developed two effective strategies for making curricular changes based on
student need and response. First,
the faculty has established a forum for sharing anecdotal, yet critical
information at faculty meetings. Secondly, faculty has evaluated the bi-monthly
exams to determine where curricular deficiencies lie. It is through this process that most curricular changes have
been made. A recent result of
these strategies is the development of the ESL
Literacy course. It was
determined through both Level One teachers, student attrition rate, and the
review of the bi-monthly exams, that some students needed greater foundational
skills to be successful in Level One.
The ESL Literacy course was
developed in 2009, and was first offered in January 2010.
5. For each
education program provided by the site, provide a general overview in the table
below. Indicate the number of
levels and general skills/content addressed by each, whether courses in each
are for credit or not-for-credit, and whether any courses are delivered by
blended or online methods.
Education program |
# of levels |
General content addressed |
For credit Yes/No |
Blended or online courses Yes/No |
ESL Plus Course of Study |
7 |
Listening,
speaking, reading, vocabulary, writing, grammar, pronunciation and cultural
instruction to prepare learners for the workplace, further study or personal
and cultural enrichment. |
no |
no |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. For each
education program, is a written curriculum guide or similar document available?
_x_ yes (If
yes, respond to 7 and 8 below.)
____ no (If
no, respond to 9 below.)
7. If yes,
state the title of the document(s) and indicate where each is available to
faculty.
ESL
Plus Course of Study Curriculum Guide.
It is available to faculty, staff, students and the public on Spanish-American
Institute's website:
ESL
Course of Study & Curriculum.
Hard
copies are also available to all faculty.
Faculty receive a hardcopy during their faculty orientation with the
Dean of Academic Affairs and/or President. Hard copies are also available to students and the public in
the Student Lounge, Special Events Center and Resource Center.
8. For each
education program (curriculum), does the curriculum guide or document display
course goals, course objectives, and student learning outcomes for each level?
_x__ yes
____ no
9. If any
education program does not have a written curriculum guide or similar document,
list the education program(s), and state where course goals, course objectives,
and student learning outcomes are made available to faculty and students.
All education programs have a written curriculum.
10. Is each
education program (curriculum) delivered as designed and described in the
curriculum guide(s), program calendar, and other written documents?
__x_ yes
____ no
11. If no,
state how delivery varies from the written curriculum design and/or program
calendar.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Current Student Survey &
Faculty Memo Current Student
Survey Results Graduate Student Placement
Questionnaire |
2. Verification on site Current Student Survey with Faculty
Memo Graduate Student Placement Questionnaires |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
The following activities will be conducted to better
review and support curriculum:
1.
Exit survey will be developed for those who leave
the ESL Plus Course of Study prior to finishing the course of study. This survey will better inform SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE on the reasons for exit and help guide any necessary curricular
changes. March 2013.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Curriculum
Standard 2: Course goals, course objectives, and student learning outcomes are
written, appropriate for the curriculum, and aligned with each other.
A. Required responses
1. List all
written curriculum documents, whether print or electronic, maintained by the
program that state the course goals, course objectives, and/or student learning
outcomes (SLOs) for each course and level.
ESL
Plus Course of Study Curriculum Guide (print, electronic)
Syllabi
2012 (print, electronic)
2. Describe
how the courses within levels and within the program as a whole are
interrelated and sequenced.
The
ESL Plus Course of Study has its’ own goals. These goals are interwoven in each of the courses under the
ESL Plus Course of Study.
Each level builds on the previous level and follows best practices in
ESL teaching. Students are
assessed on the student learning outcomes and achieve mastery of these outcomes
before progressing to the next level. Below is an overview of each courses’
objectives and student learning outcomes.
Meeting these outcomes represents significant progress.
Course |
Objectives: |
Outcomes: |
|
Students will comprehend and respond appropriately to simplified spoken English on familiar topics and to produce basic spoken English on familiar topics in social situations; comprehend and analyze simplistic texts in English; recognize word order and simple sentence structure. |
Students will be able to: Recognize
frequently used words, phrases and questions in familiar contexts. Respond appropriately to simple questions regarding personal
information and present activities. State personal information; and ask for personal information. Use personal information to complete simple forms. Write basic personal information. Write simple sentences using personal information. Recognize
personal information in print. |
ESL
501.1 |
Students will
read, listen to and respond to spoken English on familiar topics, such as
self, school, family, work and everyday activities; comprehend and
appropriately use basic grammatical structures in both written and spoken
English; identify key ideas in basic texts relating to everyday topics; and
construct simple and compound sentences on a familiar topic or idea. |
Students
will be able to: State
simple descriptions of people, places, routines, likes and dislikes. Respond appropriately to simple questions regarding personal
information, present activities, past activities and home, family, work and
hobbies. Recognize and identify key ideas in a short passage relating to self,
home, family, work, and hobbies. Write
simple sentences and compound sentences relating to self, home, family, work,
hobbies and present and past activities. |
ESL
501.2 |
Students will read, listen to and respond appropriately to high-beginning spoken English and use
spoken English in real world situations; use grammatical structures necessary
for expressing the present, the future and the past time; comprehend and
analyze high beginning texts. |
Students
will be able to: Express
simple statements and questions in the present, past and future time frame
related to basic needs and common activities, using previously learned
phrases. Communicate needs and activities using appropriate time frame and
vocabulary. Employ simple clarification requests to determine meaning of question
or statement. Recognize words that signal differences between present, past and
future. Respond appropriately using present, past and future on familiar topics. Interpret short paragraphs on familiar topics. Identify sequence of events in short readings. Examine authentic documents to locate specific information. Produce
a paragraph on a familiar topic. |
ESL
501.3 |
Students will read, listen to and respond appropriately to spoken English and use spoken English in
a variety of work and social situations; comprehend and use grammatical
structures in written and spoken English in an academic setting; comprehend
texts in English; and produce written language in the form of a standard
paragraph. |
Students
will be able to: Recognize
main ideas and details in conversations and short lectures. Communicate needs, activities and events using appropriate time frame
and vocabulary. Employ clarification strategies. Apply linguistic, socio-cultural and other background knowledge and
strategies to understand the intent of a speaker and to respond
appropriately. Speak so others can understand by recalling and using limited
vocabulary including words related to common, everyday topics, personal
experience, know and use basic grammar and sentence structure and appropriate
level of formality. Interpret short paragraphs on familiar topics. Predict meanings of unfamiliar vocabulary with contextual clues. Identify sequence of events in short readings. Examine authentic documents to locate specific information. Convey
ideas in a paragraph with detailed information. |
ESL
501.4 |
Students will read, listen to and respond appropriately to natural,
authentic spoken English; use spoken English in a variety of social, academic
and professional settings; comprehend and use grammatical structures in both
written and spoken English in various contexts; comprehend and analyze
authentic texts; organize information and produce written summaries. |
Students
will be able to: State
detailed descriptions of events, activities and personal experiences. Identify main ideas and some details of extended conversations and
broadcasts. Employ clarification strategies. Speak so others can understand to recall and use high-frequency
vocabulary, display control of basic grammar and a variety of sentence types. Read with understanding to decode and recognize most everyday and some
unfamiliar words. Identify sequence of events in extensive readings. Examine analyze authentic documents to locate specific information. Determine the purpose and audience for communicating in writing. Convey ideas in a short essay with detailed information. Identify
and modify sentences for time frame errors and mechanics, such as spelling, punctuation
and capitalization. |
ESL
501.5 |
Students read, listen to and respond timely and appropriately to natural, authentic spoken English; use spoken English in a variety of social, academic and professional settings; comprehend and use grammatical structures in both written and spoken English in social, academic and professional contexts; comprehend, analyze and synthesize authentic texts by predicting, identifying main ideas and supporting details; organize information and produce written summaries. |
Students
will be able to: State
detailed descriptions of events, activities and experiences. Identify main ideas and details of extended conversations, lectures and
broadcasts. Apply linguistic, socio-cultural and other background knowledge and
strategies to understand fully the literal and implied intent of the speaker. Employ clarification strategies. Respond timely and appropriately using present, past and future and
modal forms on social, professional and academic topics. Interpret short paragraphs on social, professional and academic topics. Speak so others can understand to recall and use sufficient
wide-ranging vocabulary as well as control of basic grammar and a variety of
sentence types. Predict meanings of unfamiliar vocabulary with contextual clues. Identify sequence of events in extensive readings and lectures. Examine and analyze authentic documents to locate specific detailed
information. Convey
ideas in an essay. Identify and modify written work for structural
errors and mechanics, such as spelling, punctuation and capitalization. |
ESL
501.6 |
Students will listen, speak, read, and write using longer compound and complex sentences and more extensive vocabulary than expected of ESL V students. They will apply language skills at a higher level of critical thinking to make predictions, express and defend opinions, summarize information, retell a conversation, and compare and contrast. |
Students
will be able to: State
detailed descriptions of events, activities and experiences with both fluency
and clarity. Identify main ideas, and supporting details of extended conversations,
lectures and broadcasts. Employ discourse connectors. Use advanced strategies to repair gaps in understanding, to ask
questions to deepen comprehension and to give feedback appropriate to the
situation. Respond timely and appropriately using a wide variety of grammatical
structures and vocabulary. Interpret readings on social, professional and academic topics. Predict content in readings. Identify events and activities in extensive readings and lectures. Examine, analyze and synthesize authentic documents to locate specific
detailed information. Convey
ideas in an organized essay with a clear thesis, supporting ideas and
details. |
ESL
502 |
Students will read intensively
and write extensively. Students
will develop vocabulary and clear pronunciation needed for a professional
business setting.
|
Students
will be able to: Employ different patterns of development in writing. Recognize
how context affects meaning, grammar, and other writing choices. Recognize
and correctly use English grammar in context with an emphasis upon grammar
and usage issues for ESL writers. Identify
and use correct punctuation, mechanics, and spelling in business and real
world writing. Identify
and restate main ideas, implied meanings and supporting details. Make
inferences and draw conclusions orally and in written form. |
ESL
503 |
Students will read intensively
and write extensively to develop rhetorical patterns necessary for successful
academic study. Students will
give oral presentations that are organized and fluent.
|
Students
will be able to: Employ different patterns of development in academic
writing. Recognize
how context affects meaning, grammar, and other writing choices. Recognize
and correctly use English grammar in context with an emphasis upon grammar
and usage issues for ESL writers. Identify
and use correct punctuation, mechanics, and spelling in academic and real
world writing. Identify
and restate main ideas, implied meanings and supporting details. Make
inferences and draw conclusions both orally and in written form. |
3. Explain
how the program ensures that course goals and objectives align with the
course’s student learning outcomes.
(See Glossary: Course goal, Course objective, Student learning outcome).
In
the creation of all courses at SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE, best practices in
both course development and language acquisition have been researched. As outlined in our Institutional Effectiveness Plan 2009-2014, all courses are
periodically reviewed by the Dean of Academic Affairs to assess the alignment
of student learning outcomes to both course objectives and goals. Furthermore, NYS State Department of
Education renews and approves all courses and programs. As part of this review, courses are
both internally and externally scrutinized to ensure all student learning
outcomes align with goals and objectives of a course. Lastly, Intensive English Language (IEL) Chairs also yearly
review current syllabi and specifically refine student learning outcomes to
align with the course objectives and overall goal.
4. For each
curriculum, select four examples of student learning outcomes (SLOs). For one curriculum, insert each SLO
below, followed by a brief description of the ways that each is observed and
measured. For additional
curricula, prepare and attach a similar chart, with four example SLOs for each.
Course, level, and SLO: ESL 500 (English Literacy) |
How is this SLO observed and measured? |
Example 1 Students
will be able to recognize frequently used words, phrases and questions in
familiar contexts. |
Observed
and measured through vocabulary exercises in and out of the classroom, formal
vocabulary assessments. |
Example 2 Students
will be able to respond appropriately to simple questions regarding personal
information and present
activities. |
Observed
and measured through in-class conversation practice, role-plays, and formal
assessments. |
Example 3 Students
will be able to state personal information |
Observed
and measured through in-class conversation practice, role-plays, and formal
assessments. |
Example 4 Students
will be able to use personal information to complete simple forms. |
Observed
and measured through in and out of class simple writing activities, and
formal assessments. |
5. Are levels
or courses ever combined?
__x__ no (Do not respond to 6 and 7 below.)
_____ yes
6. State the
circumstances in which courses or levels may be combined.
7. When
levels or courses are combined, explain how course goals and objectives are
impacted, how they are re-aligned with the overall curriculum, and how they are
re-aligned with student learning outcomes for the level or course.
8. Are
students admitted to existing classes?
_____ no (Do
not respond to 9 and 10 below.)
_x__ yes
9. Describe
the circumstances in which students are admitted to existing classes and state
the procedures for integrating such students into existing classes.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE is an open entry institution.
Thus, students are frequently testing and placing into courses. However, as stated in both the Faculty Handbook and the School Catalog, students may only enter
courses the second Monday of each month.
10. When
students are admitted to existing classes, explain how the program ensures that
each course maintains adherence to the curriculum’s planned and sequenced
course goals, course objectives, and student learning outcomes while meeting
the needs of the entering student.
The
Dean of Academic Affairs reviews student placement, test results and student
achievement periodically. To date, review continues to confirm conclusions that
placement is accurate in
most instances, and aggregate test scores per ESL 3 levels and above
increased from 2006 forward over previous years consistent with anticipated
improved academic outcomes because of implementation of the existing ESL
curricular goals and instructional emphases.
11. Describe
how the program has established that course objectives and student learning
outcomes within the curriculum represent significant progress or accomplishment
relative to the norms of the field.
(See Appendix A.)
Through
the self-review processes for ACICS and the Institutional Effectiveness Plan,
student progress or achievement of student learning outcomes are continually
reviewed and analyzed. Student
learning outcomes are all measurable and performance based. Using a performance-based curriculum is
a current and effective best practice in the teaching of ESL. Performance based outcomes clearly
demonstrate what the student is able to do. Additionally, the Spanish-American Institute’s employs the
philosophy that students need to be taught following a lexical approach to language learning.
The lexical approach is consistent with the natural way we learn
language. We learn language by first hearing it, then by speaking it,
then by reading it, and only then by writing it. The lexical approach fills in the gap between grammar and
vocabulary left by the older tradition of language
teaching.
The lexical approach to language learning is based on the principle
that people comprehend and produce connected language "chunks."
These lexical chunks become the raw data (mental lexicon) through which
students come to understand and use language patterns.
The
lexical approach pays particular attention to "collocations" or word
partnerships. Linguists understand collocation to mean the way certain
words occur together naturally in the language with more than random
frequency. Advances in computer-based studies of language have provided
huge databases of lexical frequency and collocations.
Both
performance based outcomes and a lexical approach to teaching, are adequately
measured through the use of informal and formal assessment measures. Informal assessments include
conversations, role-plays, oral presentations, vocabulary and reading quizzes,
listening activities and paragraph/essay writing. Formal assessments include our bi-monthly exam that is a
standardized exam and measures all student learning outcomes. These measurements are recorded in our
student information system.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report ESL-Plus
Course of Study Syllabi 2012 Guidelines for
students entering at various times |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve the
program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
A curriculum map will be developed to create a
snapshot of the outcomes in each course level, as well as organize a visual
that presents a timeline of outcomes. March 2013.
2.
Full implementation of web-based course management
system to better assess student learning outcomes and report on student
learning outcomes. These will be
phased in quarterly. April 2013.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Curriculum
Standard 3: The instructional materials and methodologies are appropriate and
contribute to the mastery of course objectives.
A. Required responses
1. State any
language learning/teaching approaches, theories or methodologies to which the
program or language institution primarily subscribes.
All
ESL courses follow a performance based, lexical and active learning strategy
approach. Students are active
participants in the learning process.
Group work, pair work, question and discussion are common practices in
the ESL classes at SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE. This approach is a best practice
as outlined by TESOL and other professional language associations. Furthermore, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE
recognizes that our student population is diverse both ethnically and
academically, therefore, faculty take into account the wealth of life
experiences our students bring to our classes. Students are active in building background knowledge on
particular subjects.
Lastly,
language is not isolated, so language skills are not taught in isolation. Listening and speaking are taught
alongside reading and writing.
Students use a textbook series that recycles vocabulary and builds
schema in each skill area. While students are listening to a lecture on
philanthropy they are also reading, writing and talking about it.
2. If varied
methods are in use, explain how they are integrated into a coherent approach
that accomplishes delivery of the curriculum.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE orients all new instructors prior to teaching. The Dean of Academic Affairs or
President works with new faculty and uses an in-house generated orientation
packet, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE ESL
Teaching Standards of Good Practice in ESL Teaching. This document covers Spanish-American
Institute's approach to language teaching, as well as a detailed explanation of
the curricula. Each course is
described in detail, with goals, objectives and outcomes. Instructional tools are highlighted as
to why they were chosen, and the method in which they should be used in class.
In-class examples of how the text and other instructional tools should be used
to best meet each courses student learning outcomes are described. Supplementary materials are also
outlined and detailed how they can also be used to support the achievement of
the student learning outcomes.
3. If a
particular method is used for a particular course/level, for each course
explain why the method is appropriate for the target curriculum, course goals
and objectives, and student learning outcomes.
Methods
and approaches are consistent in the teaching of all levels and courses.
4. List the
types of instructional materials and instructional technologies used in each
curriculum. Describe how the
program or language institution has determined these materials and technologies
meet the needs of students and are effective for delivering the curriculum.
Level
One uses WorldView (an integrated skills text), Levels 2-6 use the NorthStar
series, Levels 1-5 (Listening & Speaking and Reading & Writing). In addition to the texts, the students
in Level Four are also piloting the MyNorthStar Lab. MyNorthStarLab is a web-based course management system with
course content. Therefore,
students can practice and engage in course content outside of the classroom in
a stimulating and productive manner.
It is our hope that the MyEnglishLabs will be fully integrated into
existing course content by April 2013 due to our plan to quarterly phase in the
digital component.
These
materials were chosen after careful examination of publisher produced
materials, as well as presentations by several publishing companies and
well-respected ESL Professionals.
NorthStar and WorldView employ the ESL teaching profession’s model of
best practices which the Institute promotes in all its ESL classes. Each
NorthStar unit integrates reading/writing with listening/speaking to help
students build language competence while encouraging personal expression. Vocabulary
is recycled through each unit and each text.
The NorthStar Method incorporates the following:
1. Respect for
Students. NorthStar assumes that
students are mature, intelligent people who have something to say, even when
not fluent in English.
2. Critical
Thinking/Higher Order Thinking Skills. Each NorthStar unit leads students through exercises of increasing
detail and complexity. "Thinking" with a language develops
neural pathways in the brain. These neural pathways are not developed by
passive drills such as grammar exercises. We do not speak grammar.
When students think with or create with language, they begin to make it theirs
own because the languages patterns become imprinted in their brains.
3. Vocabulary
Comprehension Learned From Context. The purpose of NorthStar's
“vocabulary” work is not to teach words. Words are not ends in
themselves. NorthStar’s vocabulary and other word-work integrates several
language skills at once. “Vocabulary” in NorthStar requires reading, thinking,
writing, etc. Sections called “Vocabulary” or “Focus on Words” provide
practice in the use of words within larger contexts. “Words” are the
variable raw material that develop the target reading, writing, speaking, and
listening skills.
4.a. Grammar
Learned From Context and Application.
NorthStar’s
formal grammar unit comes near the end of the unit. This is
deliberate. We do not speak grammar. We certainly do not learn to
listen or speak by learning grammar. In NorthStar, by the time students
get to the formal “grammar” section, they have had considerable experience
using the unit’s target grammar. They have already:
·
heard the
grammar forms many times,
·
spoken the
grammar forms many times,
·
read the
grammar forms many times, and
·
written them
(to the extent that the teacher has provided students with writing
opportunities based on the Unit’s activities).
4.b. Student
Questions About Grammar. Students often tell teachers
that
they
want to learn grammar. What do students mean by this? Often, it
means that they are more comfortable doing passive grammar then doing the
harder work of really using a new language. Good teachers will explain to
them why they will learn more English by actively using it then by doing
grammar drills.
Just as often, students who say they want more grammar really mean that
they want more work in writing. Most of the international students at the
Spanish-American Institute want to attend an American college or
university. They know that they need more work in the academic
application of English. And they know they will need to pass the TOEFL test
which requires a lot of writing.
NorthStar requires students to actively use English in an integrated
fashion. The authors of the TOEFL exam, have stated that NorthStar is the
best preparation for the TOEFL exam. It is the best preparation for the
TOEFL because NorthStar requires students to use English in reading,
writing, speaking, and listening in the integrated ways tested by the
TOEFL.
5.
Activities. NorthStar uses connected
“activities” instead of “exercises.” Students participate in “activities”
through which they actively learn to create with language.
6. Style. NorthStar’s "Style" section teaches the cultural and social
uses of English in everyday life, in the workplace, and in the American
classroom. Examples include: how to answer the telephone in home
and business settings, how to disagree with someone, or how to get someone's
attention without making them angry. These are culture-bound activities
that differ from one culture to another.
7.
Research/Fieldwork. At the end of each NorthStar
unit, students engage in highly structured guided activity based on the Unit's
theme. The activity typically requires that they observe something
"in the field" or do research on the Internet or elsewhere and then
share their observations with a group or with the class. Again, NorthStar
never asks students to do something for which they are not prepared.
Notice how NorthStar always provides students with a “safety net” (see item 8,
below) such as an outline to follow or a set of guiding questions. Please
spend as much time as it takes on this important textbook component, since it
allows students to employ everything they have learned in the Unit, creating
with language.
8. Safety
Nets. NorthStar has built-in safety nets. Each
exercise or activity builds upon the skills of the previous one(s). The
textbook never asks students to do something without previously having given
them the material and guidance they need to do it. The safety net assumes
that teachers will recognize when they need to return to a previous activity
and repeat it. If students have difficulty with a new activity, they
obviously have not mastered the skills of previous activities needed to do the
new work. This cues the teacher that he/she should go back to previous
learning activities and repeat them until students have mastered them.
5. Explain
how the program ensures that instructional materials are clearly related to
classroom activities and assignments.
There
is a continuous, ongoing effort to ensure that all instructional materials are
supportive of the delivery course goals, and thus the achievement of the
student learning outcomes. The
Dean of Academic Affairs along with the Division Chairs of IEL (Intensive
English Language) provide on-going training to faculty regarding how to use the
instructional materials to best meet the learner needs and appeal to a variety
of learning styles. Faculty
meetings always have an outside speaker or workshop that presents on this
cohesive framework. Thus,
faculty are well versed in constructing activities and assignments that align
with student learning outcomes.
6. State
where or how course materials are made available to faculty and students.
Course
materials are provided for all faculty.
Additionally, faculty have access to supplementary instructional
materials through our Instructional Resource Manual (both hard copy and web
link), and our Teacher Resources link off our homepage.
All
course materials are available through our onsite bookstore. Additionally, the
Institute supports the Student Club’s Book Exchange program, as well as
allowing students to post notifications regarding texts on the Institute’s
Student Club Facebook page.
7. State the
program’s or language institution’s copyright policy and state where it is made
available.
The following is Spanish-American Institute's copyright
policy. It is found in our Faculty Handbook, in the School Catalog and through both links
off our website.
The Spanish-American Institute requires
faculty to observe the legal restrictions on duplication of copyrighted
material in the United States Copyright Law. The duplication of multiple
copies of print and graphic material for classroom use is restricted by the
Law's "fair use" guidelines.
While the Law does not provide an exact measure
of the amount of copyrighted material that a faculty member may duplicate
without first seeking permission from or making payment to the author or
publisher of the copyrighted material, it does provide guidelines restricting
the nature and amount of material that may be duplicated and the amount that
may be duplicated in any time period.
The Spanish-American Institute strives to
provide teachers and students with comprehensive copyrighted required textbook
and workbook materials for all courses. Faculty are encouraged to
maximize the use of school textbooks and workbooks in their classes and to use
additional material only when absolutely necessary. In those instances,
The Spanish-American Institute has adopted the following "fair use"
requirements for multi-copying of copyrighted material, consistent with
standards used at many other postsecondary institutions.
Faculty members are required to observe the following school copyright policy, whether
the material for classroom use is being duplicated by the Spanish-American
Institute or by a source outside the school:
1.
"Consumable works" such as workbook material may never
be copied for classroom use.
2.
The same item shall not be duplicated over and over again.
3.
No more than 10% or 1,000 words, whichever is less, of a
longer prose work may be duplicated for classroom use.
4. For all other material,
consult with the Dean of Academic Affairs before duplicating multiple
copies.
B. Verification
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1.
Describe the follow up activities, with timelines,
that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language institution’s
practices under this standard.
If no action is planned, indicate “none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE will fully implement
MyNorthStar Lab to support current instruction. To measure it’s effectiveness to achieve student learning
outcomes, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE will conduct two surveys. The first will be to measure student
perception of effectiveness.
Secondly, the Dean of Academic Affairs will compare success rates of a cohort
of students who only used traditional texts, with a cohort of learners who used
the web-based tool in addition to course texts. Progression time, retention and
bi-monthly assessment scores will all be evaluated. April 2013.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Faculty
Standard 1: Faculty members have education
and training commensurate with their teaching assignments.
A.
Required responses
1. List all
faculty categories within the program or language institution. For each
category, describe the distinguishing features, and state the required minimum
educational and training qualifications for employment.
There
is only one rank of faculty at Spanish-American Institute. All faculty meet Spanish-American
Institute's, ACICS’s and New York State’s requirements to teach. These include:
·
bachelor’s degree or above;
·
transcripts or diploma’s formally evaluated for US equivalency by a
NACES credential evaluation agency such as Josef Silny and Associates, Inc.,
International Education Consultants and World Education Services;
·
license to teach ESL from the State of New York Education Department;
·
orientation training from the President and the Dean of Academic
Affairs at SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE.
Upon
hiring, the institute verifies all qualifications with official
transcripts. Faculty are then
oriented prior to teaching. The
formal orientation involves working with both the President and the Dean of
Academic Affairs. The President
orients the new faculty to the institution’s mission, philosophy, payroll and
benefits, and faculty responsibilities as outlined in the Faculty
Handbook. The faculty are then
oriented to specific course content by the Dean of Academic Affairs. This orientation involves receiving
texts, course materials (including syllabi), instructional methodologies, and
other supporting materials. The
Dean reviews the Institute’s handbook, ESL
Teacher Orientation Standards of Good Practice in ESL Teaching. New hires observe several classes in
the level he or she will be teaching as well as the subsequent level, prepare
lessons and begin teaching.
2. For each
category, state how these required minimum qualifications are consistent with
and directly support the program’s or language institution’s mission,
established curriculum, and other program components.
All faculty hold New York State licenses
to teach ESL, and are well trained prior to teaching in carrying out the
mission of the institute.
Furthermore, through both Faculty Responsibilities (as outlined in the Faculty Handbook) and the Professional Development Plan which each
teaching member is required to complete, the qualifications of the faculty
exceed the minimum standards and move the institution forward in carrying out
its’ mission. The faculty
are encouraged to participate in all faculty meetings. These meetings, which include a
workshop, provide professional development experiences for the faculty. These intensive workshops are dedicated
to a specific aspect of instruction, and allow members to explore new teaching
materials and methods.
Furthermore, as stated in our Professional Development Plan, Faculty members have responsibilities to their
discipline and to the advancement of knowledge generally. To this end,
they shall devote their energies to developing and improving their scholarly
competence and to remaining informed and knowledgeable about developments in
the academic areas to which their teaching assignments relate.
Each faculty member is
asked to participate in the preparation of an annual "Professional
Development Plan" which details specific professional goals and the means
to attain them.
3. State how
the program or language institution ensures that faculty members’
qualifications are aligned with their teaching assignments, including
assignment to teacher training courses and blended or online courses, if
applicable.
All
teachers are required to have the minimum qualifications as set out by both SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE and the New York State Department of Education. Thus, each teacher holds a New York
State Education Department license and is qualified to teach in the areas
specified in their license. All
teachers of ESL-Plus courses have a BA or BS degree, hold the NYS Education
Department Teacher of English to Speakers of Other Languages license and have
taken the state-required methods courses.
Teachers are assigned courses based on both personal interest and
previous experience with courses.
The President makes assignments and uses data from all forms of
evaluation to create the master schedule and make assignments.
4. Complete
the Table of Faculty provided by CEA at the accreditation workshop. For any faculty who do not meet the
program’s or language institution’s stated minimum qualification for
employment, list the name of each individual and state the rationale for each
individual’s employment and teaching assignments.
The Table of Faculty it included with this Self-study
report at Table of ESL Faculty. There are no faculty who do not meet
the stated minimum qualifications for employment.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report |
2. Verification on site Faculty Personnel files located in
the President's Office |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1.
Describe the follow up activities, with timelines,
that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language institution’s
practices under this standard.
If no action is planned, indicate “none.”
1.
Continue to provide Faculty Workshops and conduct follow-up
survey on the value of the workshop for faculty. February 2012.
2.
Survey faculty regarding their needs, interests for
future faculty professional development workshops.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Faculty
Standard 2: Faculty have experience
relevant to teaching students at the postsecondary level in their areas of
assignment and demonstrate an ongoing commitment to professional development.
A.
Required responses
1. For each
faculty category, state the hiring requirements for teaching experience and
professional development.
There is only one faculty category. Faculty must have a BA or BS degree
and complete the TESOL methodology
sequence required by the New York State Education Department for obtaining of a
New York State TESOL Teacher's License or have completed its equivalency in credit hours in an accredited
institution..
Experience is not required. All teachers
demonstrate an ongoing commitment to professional development by
participation in pre-employment observations and conferences with the Dean of
Academic Affairs and the President.
In addition, faculty members participate in regular Faculty Meeting
Workshops, complete the NYS Education Department TESOL methodology sequence,
keep up-to-date with professional trends through their memberships in NYS TESOL
and NYS Business Teachers Association and through peer-coaching and mentoring.
2. For each
category, state the ongoing professional development requirements, including
what activities the program or institution accepts as evidence of faculty
members’ commitment to appropriate professional development. Indicate where this information is
written, how compliance with requirements is documented by faculty, and how it
is monitored.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE recognizes the value of on-going professional development. Therefore, we have established three
avenues to ensure that our faculty receive and participate in continuous,
on-going professional development practices. First, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE holds faculty meetings on
Saturdays which attendance is encouraged for all teaching personnel as outlined
in the Faculty Handbook. This is done to ensure that all
personnel will be able to attend and participate in these meetings. The first part of the day is conducted
as a regular, business meeting.
However, the second portion of the day is an intensive workshop
dedicated to a specific aspect of instruction. The Institution provides an ESL Professional from the
outside to come and conduct the workshop.
Recent workshops included:
·
Learning Taxonomy—Moving From Lower to
Higher Order Language and Thinking Skills
·
Introduction to the NorthStar Approach
·
Four Skills Integration and Burning
Questions: Connecting Through
Grammar and Theme
·
Transform the Way You Teach: Blended Learning.
Secondly,
as outlined in the Faculty Handbook, all teaching personnel are required to
complete a Faculty Development Plan. Results of the individual faculty plans
provide data for the following year’s summary evaluation, documented by
evidence that the previously agreed upon Plan’s
goals and objectives have been accomplished. Faculty meet with the Dean of Academic Affairs to develop
the plan, setting professional development goals and objectives. The Dean maintains the file, along with
documentation. Documentation
includes college transcripts, course or workshop certificates, state licenses
copies, test completion results for professional licenses or certificates,
letters or certificates recognizing participation, and in-house workshop
attendance.
Lastly,
the institution has provided funds for all teaching personnel to join the New
York State TESOL organization.
Through this organization, faculty are able to connect with other ESL
Professionals in the state, stay current on best practices in the field and
participate in NYS TESOL workshops and conferences.
3. Describe
how the program or language institution has established that teaching
experience and professional development requirements are relevant to and
support its mission.
During
the Professional Development Planning
process with the Dean of Academics, relevant opportunities are discussed and
presented. All experiences are
required to move the mission of the institution forward. Any experiences that do not do so, are
not accepted by the Dean of Academic Affairs. Furthermore, the Dean of Academic Affairs encourages faculty
to seek out those experiences that would enrich their teaching as a result of
teacher observation reports.
4. Describe
how teaching assignments are affected by the faculty member’s teaching
experience and professional development activities.
Faculty
go through a three-step evaluation process that determines his or her teaching
assignment. First, teachers are
assigned those courses that they have a professional interest and experience
with. This experience can be based
on previous teaching experience, classroom experience (i.e. Master’s courses or
other professional licensing courses), or work accomplished through a
professional development experience.
Secondly, based on the Professional
Development Plan of the faculty member, courses may be assigned to allow
faculty to experiment with a new approach or instructional tool (i.e. web-based
tool). Lastly, faculty are also
assessed by means of a classroom observation. Classroom observations provide the Dean of Academic Affairs
an avenue to see the strengths and weaknesses of each instructor.
5. Explain
how the program or language institution monitors and supports development of
faculty members who do not have appropriate experience for their individual
teaching assignments or for the program’s or institution’s mission.
The Institution encourages former students to seek out
licensing and professional development experiences in order to meet the
requirements to teach at SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE. Interested parties shadow an experienced teacher, and
complete the orientation process.
However, these personnel do not teach until they have met the minimum
requirements set by the state and SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE. Once requirements have been met, they
begin teaching under the close supervision of both the Dean of Academic Affairs
and the Division Chairs of Intensive English Language.
B. Verification
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1.
Describe the follow up activities, with timelines,
that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language institution’s
practices under this standard.
If no action is planned, indicate “none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE will continue to offer
professional development experiences for faculty.--Ongoing
2.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE will develop and implement
a teacher mentor program. A formal
teacher mentor program will support new, credentialed, but inexperienced
teaching personnel.—September 2012
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Faculty
Standard 3: Faculty who teach
English demonstrate excellent proficiency in English. In language institutions
where languages other than English are taught, faculty
demonstrate excellent proficiency in the languages they teach.
A.
Required responses
1. State the
program’s or language institution’s policies or procedures to establish that
faculty are appropriately proficient users of the target language.
New York State Department of Education requires all
faculty to have a New York State license to teach at a registered business
school. In order to obtain the
license applicants must first obtain a temporary license. To do this:
“ . . .A temporary teacher's
permit valid for one year, during which time a 30- clock-hour approved course
in general teaching methods from a proprietary school association recognized by
the commissioner or a three-semester-credit-hour course in general teaching
methods from an institution whose programs are registered or recognized by the
department shall be completed”.
After the provisional period, the following is
needed for a full license:
“. . . a full teacher's license after completion
of two additional 30-clock-hour approved professional education courses from a
proprietary school association recognized by the commissioner or three
additional semester credit hours in appropriate professional education from an
institution whose programs are registered or recognized by the department
during the period of validity of the provisional license. Such full teacher's
license shall be valid for a period of four years, and a teacher shall apply
for the renewal of such teacher's license every four years.”
Based on New York State law, applicants must
complete a methods course, and two subsequent courses. These courses are taken at an approved
institution. In order for teachers
to successfully complete these courses, they must demonstrate language
proficiency based on the criteria outlined.
Lastly, both the President and the Dean of
Academic Affairs interview all prospective candidates. Through this process language
proficiency is assessed informally, if a job offer is made official transcripts
and evaluation of foreign credentials are obtained.
2. If
applicable, state how the program or language institution ensures that a
faculty member’s proficiency in a specific variety of English is consistent
with the program’s mission as well as the objectives of the course being taught.
The
Program’s mission as well as the objectives of the courses being taught do not
require proficiency in a specific
varietal English.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Faculty
Handbook statement on English Language Proficiency |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Faculty
Standard 4: Teachers in training are appropriately selected, trained, and
supervised for the instructional situations in which they are placed.
A. Required responses
1. Indicate
if the program/institution uses teachers-in-training (such as student teachers,
graduate teaching assistants, interns, or practicum participants):
__x_ no (If no, do not respond further.)
_____ yes (if
yes, respond to 2 – 5 below.)
2. List all
teacher-in-training categories within the program or language institution. For each category, provide the required
minimum qualifications and process of selection.
3. For each
category, describe how the teachers-in-training are trained and
supervised. Indicate the
qualification and responsibilities of faculty supervisors of
teachers-in-training.
4. Explain
how the program or language institution establishes and maintains an
appropriate balance between the number of classes taught by faculty and those
taught by teachers-in-training.
5. Explain
how the program or language institution maintains quality and continuity for
students when using teachers-in-training as instructors.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Class Schedule Update 20120131 with
teacher names and Table
of ESL Faculty with degrees might be used to verify that there are no
teachers-in-training. |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
None
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Faculty
Standard 5: Faculty members each receive a job description and all the terms
and conditions of employment in writing at the time they are hired and any time
their duties or employment conditions change.
A.
Required responses
1. Complete
the table below by indicating in the right hand column the document names and
page numbers (if applicable) that inform faculty of their duties and responsibilities.
Faculty duties and responsibilities |
Found in these documents |
job responsibilities |
|
teaching load, course assignments |
|
responsibilities outside the classroom |
|
professional development expectations |
|
service expectations |
|
length of employment/appointment |
|
compensation and benefits |
|
policies regarding confidentiality of personnel records |
|
criteria and procedures for performance evaluation |
|
policies and procedures for termination |
|
grievance procedures |
2. For each
faculty category, state how, when, and in what format a faculty member is
informed when his/her duties or employment conditions change.
Faculty
employment conditions change as a result of not only performance evaluation,
but changes in student enrollment.
If enrollment is insufficient, there may be a reduction in the number of
class hours taught; however, it is a preferred practice of the Institution to
reduce payroll through attrition rather than a reduction in force.
3. Is the
faculty covered by collective bargaining agreements?
_x__ no
____ yes
4. If yes,
describe how collective bargaining agreements affect the program’s or language
institution’s contractual obligations.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Terms and Conditions
of Employment as Described in the Faculty Handbook Faculty
Performance Standards and Expectations |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Faculty
Standard 6: The program or language
institution has an adequate number of faculty, whose duties are structured to
permit timely and effective completion.
A. Required responses
1. For each
faculty category, describe the typical faculty work assignment, including all
responsibilities.
There
is only one faculty rank at the Spanish-American Institute. The typical part-time faculty member
will be responsible for 4-50 minute teaching periods. Additionally, full-time faculty members will have 4, but no
more than 7-50 minute teaching periods as well as a variety of administrative
student support activities, such as advising and counseling students regarding
personal, academic and immigration issues.
2. For each
category, explain how the program or language institution has established that
the faculty workload (including teaching and other responsibilities) sets
achievable tasks for the assigned time.
In
compliance with ACICS standards, the Spanish-American Institute assigns a
maximum of 7 teaching hours per day, with a limit of 4 class preparations.
3. List
faculty members who do not have typical assignments for their category. Indicate the mix and proportion of job
responsibilities assigned to each person and explain the rationale for these
assignments.
The
Spanish American Institute ensures through periodic review that all faculty
comply with ACICS standards and the aforementioned policies.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Teaching Assignment Schedules for
current period (in Excel format) Teaching Assignment Schedule for
current period (in .pdf format) |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Faculty
Standard 7: The program or language institution describes to faculty clearly
and in writing the performance criteria and procedures for evaluation at the
onset of the evaluation period; conducts faculty performance evaluations that
are systematic, regular, fair, objective, and relevant to achieving program or
institutional goals; and conveys evaluation results to faculty in writing in a
timely manner.
A. Required responses
1. For each
faculty category, describe the process used to evaluate faculty. Include how they are informed of the
criteria and procedures and how they receive the results of the
evaluation.
Faculty
evaluation has three components:
1. Faculty Development Plan
2. Classroom Observation with Observation
Report
3. Student Evaluations.
Faculty
work with the Dean of Academic Affairs to generate a Professional Development
Plan. These plans are based on one
of two things. First, if the
faculty member is new, the Dean will guide the teacher towards appropriate
development opportunities.
Secondly, if the faculty is a returning member, the faculty member is
asked to seek out professional development opportunities to enhance his/her
teaching, based on their previous classroom observation report.
The
classroom observation is conducted yearly. Experienced faculty, IEL chairs and
Deans observe the faculty member teaching and measures three main areas of
classroom instruction: Content, Organization and Instruction and Student
–Teacher Interaction. Within
each area, several measurable criteria are outlined. After the observation, the Dean of Academic Affairs or the President
meets with the faculty member and he or she signs the school file
copy of the evaluation form and receives a copy of their own.
Lastly, the Dean of Academic Affairs or the President reviews all student
evaluation forms and aggregates the data to ensure that programmatic outcomes
and course outcomes are being delivered in an effective and productive
manner. The Dean shares the
information with each teacher and uses the data to help guide the teacher
towards relevant professional development activities and experiences.
The entire process is clearly outlined in the Faculty Handbook. Each faculty member receives a hard
copy upon hiring, and has access to the Faculty
Handbook via SPANISH-AMERICAN Institute's website.
2. List the
sources of data used in evaluation, state how this data is collected, and state
how each contributes to the evaluation process.
The
sources of data in the evaluation process include: Professional Development Plan, the Classroom Observation
Report, and Student Evaluations.
The Professional Development Plan is collected yearly.
3. Explain
how the program or language institution ensures that faculty have input into
the evaluation process. Indicate
when faculty receive evaluation results in writing and when they can respond to
their evaluations.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE recognizes the importance of faculty input in the evaluation
process. Faculty have input in the
following two ways. First, in the
Faculty Development Plan. Faculty
Development Plans are generated based primarily on the classroom observation
and the meeting that occurs after the classroom observation between the faculty
member and the Dean of Academic Affairs.
Secondly, at that meeting, the post-observation meeting, Faculty are
given the opportunity to respond in writing to the observation report that was
written. They may add comments,
and those are attached to the observation report and kept in the personnel
file.
4. Explain
how the evaluation process is systematic, regular, fair, objective, and
relevant to achieving program goals.
Since
the process has been in place, Administration has worked to ensure that the
process is systematic, regular and fair.
This has been done in a variety of ways. First, the process is the same for all faculty. The process runs on a yearly
cycle. That is, each faculty
member will develop a Faculty Development Plan and participate in the
observation cycle yearly. All
observations are conducted by personnel who are well-experienced in ESL
methodology. Lastly, the purpose
of the observation is to ensure that the course goals are being carried
out. The observation reports
speaks directly to the faculty members ability to carry out course goals, and
adequately measure student learning outcomes.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Policies and
Procedures for evaluation Template for Professional
Development Plan |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE plans to introduce a Self-Evaluation as part of the
process. While this is currently
done in an informal manner and to a certain degree with the Professional
Development Plan, an end of year report highlighting an instructors strengths,
weaknesses, contributions, plans for future would be healthy for both the individual
teacher and the institution. March 2013
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Facilities,
Equipment and Supplies Standard 1: The program or language institution has
facilities, equipment, and supplies that support the achievement of its
educational and service goals; are adequate in number, condition, and
availability; and are accessible to students, faculty, and administrators.
A. Required responses
1. Enter the
requested numbers.
__650___ average number of students per term over the last
6 months
__18 ___ average
number of students per class
__14 ____number of available permanent classrooms
__14 ____number of classrooms needed during an average
term
__19 ____number of support staff and administrators
__19 ____number of workspaces for support staff and
administrators
__34 ____number of faculty (ESL and non-ESL)
__10 ____number of workspaces for faculty
_12 ____ number
of part-time faculty
__0_____ number of workspaces for part-time faculty * (see
clarification in #2 just below).
__5* ___ number of learning labs (computer, media, and
listening labs) * movable cart TV/DVD and
iMac Units
2. If
necessary, provide information to explain the site’s use of rooms and workspaces listed above.
Most student attend from 9:15 am to 12:55 pm or from 5:51
pm to 9:14 pm. There is amply
workspace for part-time and full-time faculty in classroom which are
un-occupied during the "off-peak" afternoon class hours. In addition there are 6 Faculty Chair
work areas available to the Department Chairs.
Part-time and full-time faculty are welcome to use the
ample number of unused internet-connected computers in the Resource Center and
in the Computer Applications Room whenever they arrive early or wish to stay
late.
In addition faculty may use work areas in the Student
Lounge and Special Events Center during their free periods. This also allows for comfortable,
informal interaction with students.
3. Describe
how the program or language institution ensures that classrooms, laboratories,
offices, and student areas are of sufficient size; are accessible to students,
faculty, administrators, and support staff; and are clean, safe, and secure.
The language institution assures that classrooms, laboratories
office and student areas are of sufficient size by monitoring the week in and monthly
enrollments and adding additional sections or shifting section level
allocations as needed.
The entire facility is located on one contiguous 12,000
square-foot floor with a comfortable quadrangular hallway design, assuring that
all resources are easily accessible to all faculty, students, and staff.
The Institute assures that the entire facility is clean by
contracting for nightly janitorial spot-mopping of floors, trash removal and
bathroom sanitizing as well as for monthly waxing all tile floor areas. Administration, faculty and staff
monitor the facility constantly during school hours for unsightly or hazardous
conditions. The administration is notified
and appropriate corrective action taken.
The Institute facility is constructed with safety and
security as a paramount concern.
All classrooms and offices are equipped with glass, vision panels. The Center Hall Computer Applications
Room has extensive vision panels on three sides. All persons entering and leaving the Institute must pass
through the reception area and past the offices of the Dean of Student Services
and the President (each of which are equipped with large vision panels and one
of which at least is always occupied).
4. List the
equipment and learning resources and materials available for instructional
uses. After each, indicate the number
of items available.
COMPUTERS |
NUMBER |
OWN/LEASE |
Apple iMac Computers |
72 |
own |
IBM NetVista PC |
9 |
own |
IBM Aptiva PC |
15 |
own |
|
|
|
OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL EQUIPMENT |
NUMBER |
OWN/LEASE |
Ricoh Color Laser Printers |
1 |
own |
HP Black and White Laser Printer |
3 |
own |
Flatbed Scanner |
1 |
own |
|
0 |
|
Adding machines |
6 |
own |
Grand Piano |
1 |
own |
|
|
|
AUDIO-VISUAL EQUIPMENT |
NUMBER |
OWN/LEASE |
Television - DVD -CD (movable Cart Units) |
3 |
own |
Overhead projector |
1 |
0wn |
Boom Box CD player |
14 |
own |
27" iMac Computers on Mobile Classroom Carts (for classroom
wireless internet and DVD/CD viewing) |
2 |
own |
|
|
|
5. List the
equipment available for administrative, support staff, and faculty use. After each, indicate the number of
items available.
Type of Equiplent |
NUMBER |
OWN/LEASE |
Apple MacBook Computers |
8 |
own |
Windows PC |
20 |
owno |
Ricoh Scanners |
2 |
own |
Booklet Binder |
1 |
own |
newletter/ flier automatic folding machine |
1 |
own |
SCO Unix Student Record database servier |
1 |
own |
Sonicwall firewall |
1 |
own0 |
M3/Mandaran Library database server |
1 |
own |
Unix internet proxy, website and mail server |
1 |
own |
backup unix proxy, website and mail server |
1 |
own |
"trixbox" unix ip phone server |
1 |
own |
IBM Wireless internet hubs |
2 |
own |
Apple Airport extreme wireless hubs |
6 |
own |
apple imax database file server |
1 |
own |
Ricoh Color laser printers |
2 |
own |
HP Laserjet printers (black & white) |
6 |
own |
Star receipt printers |
10 |
own |
Windows PC Fax server |
1 |
own |
NT Domain server |
2 |
own |
|
|
|
6. Describe
how the program or language institution ensures that equipment is properly maintained,
available from session to session, of sufficient number, and accessible to
those who need it.
The Institute ensures that the equipment is properly
maintained by being available constantly to receive student and faculty reports
of equipment in need of repair or replacement. Faculty are instructed in the Faculty Handbook on the
importance of reporting equipment in need of repair or replacement.
Students are reminded of the need to assist in good
"Housekeeping" in the School Catalog.
The Institute Bookstore is staffed continuously during
school hours to be sure that resource materials and supplies are available to
faculty and staff.
The Institute President and Deans cooperate to be sure
that faculty and staff have easy access to them through0ut the school day for
requests of supplies, materials and equipment.
7. Describe
how the program or language institution ensures that learning resources and
materials are sufficient and accessible to faculty and students.
Students may purchase their textbooks from the Institute
Bookstore. They are encouraged to
use Facebook, Amazon and the Student Club Book Exchange to obtain use texts or
to sell texts they no longer need.
By helping to control costs, the Student Club Book Exchange helps to
assure that needed materials will be available and within the economic reach of
all students.
By working more closely with book publishes the Institute
has obtained commitments this session for complimentary copies of all Teacher
Manuals and Textbooks for each faculty member. This will greatly reduce the strain on resources as the
Institute meets the needs of teachers for "next edition" texts and
manuals.
8. Describe
how the program or language institution ensures that supplies are sufficient
and accessible to those who need them.
Supplies are available in the Bookstore for easy
accessibility. The Bookstore is
staffed continuously during school hours.
Bookstore staff maintain inventory and request replenishment as needed
from the supply acquisition coordinator, Ivelisse Rymer.
B. Verification
Facilities, Equipment and Supplies Standard 1
1. Documentation in the report Faculty Handbook,
Housekeeping, page 19 School Catalog:
Bookstore Supplies, page 14 School Catalog:
Housekeeping, Supplies, page 14 |
2. Verification on site School Catalogs may be found on site in the offices of the Faculty
Student-Services Associates. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 1: The program or language institution clearly
defines and provides a rational for formal linkages with other entities.
A. Required responses
1. Indicate
the legal status of the program or language institution by checking any of the
following that apply.
_____ Program
within a university or college
Name of the department or unit within which the program
resides _________________
_____ Program
within a community college
Name of the department or unit within which the program
resides _________________
_____ Program
with direct reporting lines within a university or college, and for which some
services are managed or delivered through contracted relationships
_____
For-profit language school (corporation)
__x_ Not-for-profit language school
(corporation)
_____
Language school with agreement to offer courses or programs on a
university or college campus
_____
Other (Complete 2 below.)
2. If other,
describe the legal status of the program or language institution.
3. Define the
relationship(s) and provide the rationale(s) for any formal linkages with other
entities, including but not limited to owners, business partners, joint venture
partners, departments/units, corporations/governing boards, accreditors, or
committees.
The Spanish-American Institute has been accredited by The
Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS) to offer
certificates and diplomas since 1986.
There are no other such relationships.
4. Is the
program or language institution part of an organization with multiple
locations?
_x__ no
_____ yes
5. If yes,
explain the relationship between the locations, and between the location under
review and its managing or central office.
B. Verification
Administrative and fiscal Capacity Standard 1
1. Documentation in the report Organizational Chart in PowerPoint
format Organizational
Chart in .pdf format ACICS Certificate of
Accreditation to December 2012 |
2. Verification on site The Organization Chart may be verified in the Site Visit Team's
Review Room. The ACICS Certificate of Accreditation may be view in the
Institute's Reception Area. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 2: The program or language institution has an
administrative structure and a governance system that are effective in helping
it achieve its mission and the mission of the host institution, if applicable.
Administrative and support positions within that structure are adequate in
number and staffed with individuals who have appropriate education, training,
and experience.
A. Required responses
1. Complete
and submit the Table of Administrative and Support Staff provided by CEA at the
accreditation workshop showing numbers of administrative and support staff,
their education, training and experience, and professional development
activities.
The
Table of Administrative and Support Staff is attached to this Self-study
report.
2. Explain
how the organization of positions and lines of authority (as revealed in the
organization chart) and the numbers of administrative and support staff help
the program or language institution achieve its mission.
The organization of positions and lines of authority and
the number of administrative and support staff facilitates day-to-day
operations and helps the Institute fulfill its mission.
The administrative and support staff work under the
direct, personal supervision of senior management. They are of sufficient number and qualifications to support
senior management in the maintenance of student financial and academic records
and to maintain educational supplies, materials and equipment. They have an initial and then ongoing
orientation with the President at the time of employment and immediately
thereafter. There is a system of
"peer coaching" in place which allows new administrative and support
staff an extended time to "buddy up" with more experienced staffers
who become their mentors.
Either one or another or all of the senior management
staff (the President, Dean of Students and Dean of Administrative Services) is
available during all school hours to observe staffer's performance and answer
procedural and policy questions.
Administrative and support staff personnel folders contain
resumes showing formal education, experience and professional training.
Since the majority of the administrative and support staff
were students of the Institute and are current holders of NYS Teacher Licenses,
they are uniquely positioned, from personal experience , to exhibit firsthand knowledge
of issues relating to the teaching of English to nonnative speakers.
The President maintains a file of qualified applicants for
administrative and support staff in order to assure that all positions are filled
in a timely manner. The President
takes special care that all assignments, even temporary ones, are filled only
by fully qualified individuals.
All functions are available equally to day and
evening. The current mix of
part-time, full-time and mix-assignment administrative and support staff
assures a smooth transition as staff members and staffing needs change. There is a ready pool of cross-trained individuals
able to increase hours to full-time status or take over duties in other areas.
Administrative and support staff receive the same quantity
and quality of professional development opportunities as faculty members.
Job Description Guide and personal orientation and
observation by senior management assure that all employees understand their duties
and responsibilities.
Administrative and support staff are all holders of BA or
BS degrees as well as holders of New York State Education Department Registered Business School Teacher's
licenses in a variety of fields (almost all including TESOL Teacher's
licenses). A large majority of
administrative and support staff are also former students of the Spanish-American
Institute with experience at the Institute from on-campus employment and their
time as students in our classes.
3. Does the
program or language institution have joint administrative/faculty positions or
full-time faculty who are placed in administrative positions?
_____ no
___X_ yes
3. If yes,
explain how faculty members receive training for their administrative
responsibilities and how such positions help the program or language
institution achieve its mission.
Faculty members receive training for their administrative
responsibilities through:
·
a period orientation and observation by the
President, Dean of Student Services and the Dean of Administrative Services
·
an extended period of "peer coaching" and
direct observation as they "buddy up" with a more senior staff
mentor.
These positions help the Institute achieve its mission by
providing a ready pool of cross-trained individual with firsthand sensitivity
to the needs and expectations of international students.
4. Does the
program have part-time administrative and support staff?
_____ no
__X__
yes
5. If yes,
indicate the positions affected, and state how the program or language
institution ensures that students receive required services in these
areas.
The part-time administrative and support staff is in
addition to full-time administrative and support staff and their addition to
the Institute assures that there is adequate personnel to support the needs of
the student body as well as a ready pool of trained staffers to increase to
full-time status as individual staffers reduce their hours or leave the
Institute.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 2
1. Documentation in the report Organization Chart in PowerPoint
format Organization
Chart w IEP2012 in .pdf format Table
of Administrative and Support Staff Job descriptions for
Administrative and Support Staff positions (see links bulleted immediately
below):
|
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 3: Administrators and staff each receive a written
job description at the time they are hired and any time their duties or
employment conditions change.
A. Required responses
1. Complete the table below by indicating in the right
hand column the document names and page numbers (if applicable) that inform
administrators of their duties and responsibilities.
Administrative duties and responsibilities |
Found in these documents |
job responsibilities |
Job
Description GUIDE 20111219: Faculty Student-Services Associates |
professional development expectations |
Professional
Development Plan in Faculty Handbook |
service expectations |
|
length of employment/appointment |
|
compensation and benefits |
|
administrative structure of the program |
|
policies regarding confidentiality of personnel records |
Access To
and Maintenance of Personnel Files, page 24, Faculty Handbook |
criteria and procedures for performance evaluation |
|
policies and procedures for termination |
|
grievance procedures |
2. Complete the table below by indicating in the right
hand column the document names and page numbers (if applicable) that inform
support staff of their duties and responsibilities.
Support staff duties and responsibilities |
Found in these documents |
job responsibilities |
Job
Description GUIDE 20111219: Faculty Student-Services Associates |
professional development expectations |
Professional
Development Plan in Faculty Handbook, page 9 Professional
Development Policy in Faculty Handbook, page 11 |
service expectations |
|
length of employment/appointment |
|
compensation and benefits |
|
administrative structure of the program |
|
policies regarding confidentiality of personnel records |
Access To
and Maintenance of Personnel Files, page 24, Faculty Handbook |
criteria and procedures for performance evaluation |
|
policies and procedures for termination |
|
grievance procedures |
3. Explain
how administrative and support staff are notified of any changes in their
duties and responsibilities.
Administrative and support staff are in all instances
notified of changes in their duties and responsibilities by direct personal interviews
and consultation with the President, Dante V. Ferraro and/or Dean of Student
Services, Paul Schiffman.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 3
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 4: The program or language institution defines,
encourages, and supports appropriate professional development activities for
faculty, staff, and administrators.
A. Required responses
1. For
faculty, state the policy on professional development, where the policy is
written, and the opportunities the program or language institution encourages
and makes available.
The Institute offers equal professional development
opportunities to faculty, staff and administrators.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE recognizes the value of on-going professional development. Therefore, we have established three
avenues to ensure that our faculty receive and participate in continuous,
on-going professional development practices. First, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE holds faculty meetings on
Saturdays which attendance is encouraged for all teaching personnel as outlined
in the Faculty Handbook. This is done to ensure that all
personnel will be able to attend and participate in these meetings. The first part of the day is conducted
as a regular, business meeting.
However, the second portion of the day is an intensive workshop
dedicated to a specific aspect of instruction. The Institution provides an ESL Professional from the
outside to come and conduct the workshop.
Recent workshops included:
·
Learning Taxonomy—Moving From Lower to
Higher Order Language and Thinking Skills
·
Introduction to the NorthStar Approach
·
Four Skills Integration and Burning
Questions: Connecting Through
Grammar and Theme
·
Transform the Way You Teach: Blended Learning.
Secondly,
as outlined in the Faculty Handbook, all teaching personnel are required to
complete a Faculty Development Plan. Results of the individual faculty plans
provide data for the following year’s summary evaluation, documented by
evidence that the previously agreed upon Plan’s
goals and objectives have been accomplished. Faculty meet with the Dean of Academic Affairs to develop
the plan, setting professional development goals and objectives. The Dean maintains the file, along with
documentation. Documentation
includes college transcripts, course or workshop certificates, state licenses
copies, test completion results for professional licenses or certificates,
letters or certificates recognizing participation, and in-house workshop
attendance.
Lastly,
the institution has provided funds for all teaching personnel to join the New
York State TESOL organization.
Through this organization, faculty are able to connect with other ESL
Professionals in the state, stay current on best practices in the field and
participate in NYS TESOL workshops and conferences.
The professional development policy for faculty is found
in the Faculty Handbook on page 12.
It may be found by following this link: Professional
Development Policy for Faculty in the Faculty Handbook
The Institute provides memberships in NYS TESOL and
Business Teachers Association of NYS to all faculty, administrators and
staff. The Institute
provides professional development opportunities at each Faculty Meeting
Workshop. The Institute encourages
professional development activities by faculty, administrators and staff by
offering partial tuition/expense reimbursement for outside courses, conventions
or workshops.
2. For
administrators, state the policy on professional development, where the policy
is written, and the opportunities the program or language institution
encourages and makes available.
The Institute offers equal professional development
opportunities to faculty, staff and administrators.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE recognizes the value of on-going professional development. Therefore, we have established three
avenues to ensure that our faculty receive and participate in continuous,
on-going professional development practices. First, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE holds faculty meetings on
Saturdays which attendance is encouraged for all teaching personnel as outlined
in the Faculty Handbook. This is done to ensure that all
personnel will be able to attend and participate in these meetings. The first part of the day is conducted
as a regular, business meeting.
However, the second portion of the day is an intensive workshop
dedicated to a specific aspect of instruction. The Institution provides an ESL Professional from the
outside to come and conduct the workshop.
Recent workshops included:
·
Learning Taxonomy—Moving From Lower to
Higher Order Language and Thinking Skills
·
Introduction to the NorthStar Approach
·
Four Skills Integration and Burning
Questions: Connecting Through
Grammar and Theme
·
Transform the Way You Teach: Blended Learning.
Secondly,
as outlined in the Faculty Handbook, all teaching personnel are required to
complete a Faculty Development Plan. Results of the individual faculty plans
provide data for the following year’s summary evaluation, documented by
evidence that the previously agreed upon Plan’s
goals and objectives have been accomplished. Faculty meet with the Dean of Academic Affairs to develop
the plan, setting professional development goals and objectives. The Dean maintains the file, along with
documentation. Documentation
includes college transcripts, course or workshop certificates, state licenses
copies, test completion results for professional licenses or certificates,
letters or certificates recognizing participation, and in-house workshop
attendance.
Lastly,
the institution has provided funds for all teaching personnel to join the New
York State TESOL organization.
Through this organization, faculty are able to connect with other ESL
Professionals in the state, stay current on best practices in the field and
participate in NYS TESOL workshops and conferences.
The professional development policy for administrators is
the same as that for faculty and may be found in the Faculty Handbook on page
12. It may be found by following
this link: Professional
Development Policy for Faculty in the Faculty Handbook
The Institute provides memberships in NYS TESOL and
Business Teachers Association of NYS to all faculty, administrators and
staff. The Institute
provides professional development opportunities at each Faculty Meeting
Workshop. The Institute encourages
professional development activities by faculty, administrators and staff by
offering partial tuition/expense reimbursement for outside courses, conventions
or workshops.
3. For
support staff state the policy on professional development, where the policy is
written, and the opportunities the program or language institution encourages
and makes available.
The Institute offers equal professional development
opportunities to faculty, staff and administrators.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE recognizes the value of on-going professional development. Therefore, we have established three
avenues to ensure that our faculty receive and participate in continuous,
on-going professional development practices. First, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE holds faculty meetings on
Saturdays which attendance is encouraged for all teaching personnel as outlined
in the Faculty Handbook. This is done to ensure that all
personnel will be able to attend and participate in these meetings. The first part of the day is conducted
as a regular, business meeting.
However, the second portion of the day is an intensive workshop
dedicated to a specific aspect of instruction. The Institution provides an ESL Professional from the
outside to come and conduct the workshop.
Recent workshops included:
·
Learning Taxonomy—Moving From Lower to
Higher Order Language and Thinking Skills
·
Introduction to the NorthStar Approach
·
Four Skills Integration and Burning
Questions: Connecting Through
Grammar and Theme
·
Transform the Way You Teach: Blended Learning.
Secondly,
as outlined in the Faculty Handbook, all teaching personnel are required to
complete a Faculty Development Plan. Results of the individual faculty plans
provide data for the following year’s summary evaluation, documented by
evidence that the previously agreed upon Plan’s
goals and objectives have been accomplished. Faculty meet with the Dean of Academic Affairs to develop
the plan, setting professional development goals and objectives. The Dean maintains the file, along with
documentation. Documentation includes
college transcripts, course or workshop certificates, state licenses copies,
test completion results for professional licenses or certificates, letters or
certificates recognizing participation, and in-house workshop attendance.
Lastly,
the institution has provided funds for all teaching personnel to join the New
York State TESOL organization.
Through this organization, faculty are able to connect with other ESL
Professionals in the state, stay current on best practices in the field and
participate in NYS TESOL workshops and conferences.
The professional development policy for support staff is
the same as it is for faculty and may be found in the Faculty Handbook on page
12. It may be found by following
this link: Professional
Development Policy for Faculty in the Faculty Handbook
The Institute provides memberships in NYS TESOL and
Business Teachers Association of NYS to all faculty, administrators and
staff. The Institute
provides professional development opportunities at each Faculty Meeting
Workshop. The Institute equally
encourages professional development activities by faculty, administrators and
staff by offering partial tuition/expense reimbursement for outside courses,
conventions or workshops.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 4
1. Documentation in the report Policy
Statement on Professional Development Faculty Handbook: Professional
Development Policy Table
of Administrative and Support Staff |
2. Verification on site Table of Administrative and Support Staff may be viewed in the
President's Office. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 5: The program or language institution describes
to administrative and support staff clearly and in writing the performance
criteria and procedures for evaluation at the onset of the evaluation period;
conducts administrative and support staff performance evaluations that are
systematic, regular, fair, objective, and relevant to achieving program goals;
and conveys evaluation results to administrative and support staff in writing
in a timely manner.
A. Required responses
1. Describe
the process used to evaluate administrators. Include how they are informed of the criteria and procedures
and how they receive the results of the evaluation.
Since the number of administrators is quite small
(President, Dean of Students, Dean of Administrative Services and Dean of
Academic Affairs) and quite senior
in their tenure at the Institute and in the field of education, they are
principally evaluated through a process of collegial conversation, collaboration
and self-reflection.
They are informed of the criteria and procedures through
their Job Descriptions, Faculty Handbook, Self-study process and annual staff
evaluation form.
They receive results through the staff evaluation form and
collegial conversation and interview.
2. Explain
how the evaluation process is systematic, regular, fair, objective, and
relevant to achieving program goals.
The process is systematic in that it covers all administrators
in a methodical and thorough evaluation.
It is regular in that it is on-going and annual.
It is fair in that it applies to all administrators
equally and administrators may avail themselves of the Grievance Procedures outlined
in the Faculty Handbook.
It is objective in that it includes measures of all
administrators against the same standards.
It is relevant to achieving the program goals in that it
furthers the Institute's mission by assuring that student needs are being met.
3. Describe
the process used to evaluate support staff. Include how they are informed of the criteria and procedures
and how they receive the results of the evaluation.
Support staff are evaluated through the staff evaluation
form, through comments made in the Current Student Survey, observation by supervisors of student, visitor,
faculty and fellow staffer interaction with the staff member being evaluated.
4. Explain
how the evaluation process is systematic, regular, fair, objective, and
relevant to achieving program goals.
The process is systematic in that it is a methodical and
thorough review of important aspects of the staffer's performance.
It is regular in that it is on-going and annual.
It is fair in that it that it allow for a grievance
procedure, known in advance and applied equally to all.
It is objective in that it measures all staffers against
the same standards.
It is relevant to achieving program goals in that it helps
to assure quality service in meeting student needs.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 5
2. Verification on site Completed Evaluation Forms are available in personnel files located
in the President's Office. |
C. Program/language institution self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 6:
Administrators ensure that policies and procedures relating to program
or language institution operations are in place, accessible to all who are
affected by them, reviewed regularly, and implemented in a timely, fair,
systematic, and ethical manner.
A. Required responses
1. Check the means
by which the program or language institution conveys operational policies and
procedures to those who need them and indicate how they are made accessible.
Document |
Print |
On-line |
policy/operations manuals |
|
|
administrative handbook |
|
|
faculty handbook |
X |
X |
student handbook |
|
|
other (list) School Catalog (with student procedures and
policies) |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Explain
the process for regular review of policies and procedures related to faculty,
including who is involved in the review (Job
Description GUIDE 20111219: President, Policy and Procedures Related To Faculty).
The policies related to faculty are reviewed by the
Academic Dean, Department Chairs, other Deans and the President through
informal meetings and conversations, faculty meetings and through the
self-study process.
3. Explain
the process for regular review of policies and procedures related to students,
including who is involved in the review.
The policies related to students are reviewed by the
Academic Dean, Department Chairs, other Deans and the President through
informal meetings and conversations, faculty meetings and through the
self-study process (Job
Description GUIDE 20111219: President, Policy and Procedures Related To
Students).
4. Explain the process for regular review of policies and
procedures related to administrators and support staff, including who is
involved in the review.
The policies related to administrators and support staff
are reviewed by the Academic Dean, Department Chairs, other Deans and the
President through informal meetings and conversations, faculty meetings and
through the self-study process (Job
Description GUIDE 20111219: President: Policy and Procedures Related To
Administrators and Support Staff).
5. Describe
how new policies and procedures are implemented.
New Policies and procedures are implemented through memos,
updates to the School Catalog, updates to the Faculty Handbook, updates to the
school website, updates to the Job Descriptions Guide , and through Faculty
Meeting announcement/training/discussion.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 6
2. Verification on site School Catalogs may be verified in the offices of the Faculty
Student-Services Associates |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 7: Administrators ensure that there are means for
the exchange of information among those who need it.
A. Required responses
1. Check any
of the following that the program or language institution uses to exchange
information among those who need it.
Faculty and staff
__X___email
__X___faculty/staff meetings
_____ mail
boxes
__X___bulletin boards
__X___social networking tools
______intranet
__X___shared computer drives
__X___class maintenance applications
__X___other (list) hand delivery of personalized minutes, memos,
agendas, handbooks, manuals
also
"Group Text Messaging" for emergencies and special urgent communications.
Students
___X__email
___X__classes
___X__bulletin boards
_____ intranet
__X__class maintenance applications
__X__other (list) bulk text messaging of school closings,
exams, starting day obligations
2. If
electronic means of communication are used, explain how the program or language
institution ensures reliable and secure access.
Reliable and secure access is assured by maintaining
up-to-date email and cell phone lists of faculty staff and students. Providing free WiFi access throughout
the Institute. Providing student
access through computer access in the Resource Center, staff access at every office
workstation and faculty access to computers with internet in the Computer
Applications Room 20.
In addition all support staff, faculty and administration
electronic communications is followed by hardcopy memo.
Student essential electronic communication is followed by
telephonic, personal or written (paper) communication.
3. If
electronic means of communication are used, state how the faculty, staff, and
students are informed about their responsibilities for accessing such
information.
With faculty meetings announcements, minutes, agendas,
memos as with all other electronic means of communication, the electronic means
are always used for their added value of timeliness and low cost and ease of
delivery but electronic means are always used as a backup means of
communication, followed up by hand-delivered, individually addressed paper
communication of responsibilities, events and changes.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 7
1. Documentation in the report Policy
on Dissemination of Information in Faculty Handbook Policy
On Dissemination of Information in School catalog |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 8: The program or language institution documents
that it is in compliance with all local, state, and federal laws, as well as
with any applicable institutional regulations.
A. Required responses
1. Describe
the policies and procedures in place to ensure and document that the program or
language institution meets applicable laws and regulations related to
immigration and state how such laws and regulations are being met.
The Institute Primary Designated School Official (PDSO),
Dante V. Ferraro, provides access to ICE directives to Designated School
Officials (DSO) through the Institute's internet access and email servers. The PDSO provides copies of ICE
Regulations to DSO's. The PDSO
oversees the online training of DSO from web materials made available through
ICE. The ultimate responsibility
for assuring compliance with applicable law and regulation relating to
immigration lies with the President.
He assures that such laws and regulations are being met by personal
monitoring of staff performance, providing in-service and professional growth
opportunities, making available training materials and e-mail updates to
Faculty Student-Services Associates and DSO. overseeing online, web training of DSO made available by
SEVIS/ICE.
The administration provides school e-mail addresses to
DSO's which are monitored by the PDSO for quality control and training
purposes.
The Dean of Administrative Services, Thomas Schwenke daily
compares information from the Institute "Schoolworks" database with
information the SEVIS database.
Students are advised of their attendance and good academic standing
obligations as needed. Lists
students in need of counseling are referred by the Dean of Administrative
Services to the Dean of Student Services for conferences.
The Dean of Student
Services, Dean
of Administrative Services and other DSO daily make contact with other
institutions concerning transfers in and transfers out and well as Letters of
Acceptance and notifications to students who have received change of status
approvals or denials.
All Faculty Student-Services
Associates assure that student admission eligibility requirements in the
areas of documentation of prior education, information showing means of support
for an academic term, I-20 copies, national identity document personal data
page, placement test result documentation, etc. are included in each student's
file.
2. Describe
the policies and procedures in place to ensure and document that the program or
language institution meets applicable copyright laws and state in which
documents such policies and procedures are found.
The Institute clearly enunciates its policies and has
procedures in place to ensure and documents that the school meets copyright
laws. These polices and procedures
appear in the Faculty Handbook, Instructional Resource Manual: Fall 2010,
School Catalog and Faculty 2012 Memo.
Links to each are provided below.
Copyright
Policy in Faculty Handbook
Instructional
Resource Manual Fall 202010,
Copyrighted Materials
catalog Vol 27
Spring 2012.doc Fair Use Duplication of Copyrighted Materials
Faculty
Memo Copyright 2012.doc
3. Describe the policies and procedures in place to ensure
and document that the program or language institution meets applicable laws
related to hiring of personnel and state in which documents such policies and
procedures are found.
The Institute is a equal educational opportunity
institution. Its policy stating
that the President must ensure that the Institute meets applicable laws
relating to hiring of personnel is stated in the Job Description Guide (Job
Description GUIDE 20111219 ).
4. Describe the policies and procedures in place to ensure
and document that the program or language institution meets applicable laws related
to privacy of information, if any, and state in which documents such policies
and procedures are found.
The Institute establishes policy that the President
assures procedures that meet applicable law relating to privacy in the
President's job description in the Job Description Guide (.Job
Description GUIDE: President, Privacy of Information).
The Institute establishes policy relating to privacy of
information in the School Catalog (catalog
Vol 27 Spring 2012: Policy on Dissemination of Information).
5. Describe the policies and procedures in place to ensure
and document that the program or language institution meets any applicable laws
related to facilities and state how the law is being met.
The Institute establishes policy relating to meeting applicable
laws relating to facilities in the President's job description in the Job
Description Guide and maintains documentation in the President's Office with
the Certificate of Occupancy.
6. Describe the policies and procedures in place to ensure
and document that the program or language institution meets applicable laws
related to doing business and state in which documents such policies and
procedures are found.
The President's Job description in the Job Description
Guide directs that the President meet applicable laws related to doing business
including NYS
Education Department School License, ACICS accreditation,
New
York State Attorney General Charities Letter, and Department
of State Certificate of Good Corporate Character. The President implements actions needed to maintain
licensing, accreditation and corporate status.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 8
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 9: Financial, student, personnel, program,
governmental, and contractual records are maintained and kept current,
accessible, complete, accurate and, when appropriate, secure. Reporting is done
ethically and in compliance with the law.
A. Required responses
1. For each
item in the list below, state how records are maintained and kept current and
secure.
Student records, personnel
records, financial records and contracts
with vendors are maintained in paper files on site with electronic backup
copies both on site and off site.
They are maintained and updated by designated Institute personnel on a
timely basis as new information becomes available on a daily, weekly, monthly,
quarterly and yearly cycle. They
are kept secure in offices and locked closets as appropriate (Job
Description GUIDE 20111219: President: Administrative and Fiscal Capacity and
Law) .
2. For each
item in the list below, state how related reporting, if any, is done ethically
and incompliance with the law.
Student records are maintained
in accordance with NYS Education Department laws and regulations relating to
Registered Private Business Schools and ACICS accreditation requirements.
Personnel records are kept in
accordance with NYS tax, NYS Education Department and ACICS accreditation rules,
regulations and laws.
Financial records of student
payments are kept and updated in accordance with Federal, State, and City tax
reporting requirements and enrollment agreement terms.
Contracts with vendors and
contractual records are reported and disclosed wherever and whenever required
in the manner prescribed by law or regulation.
Government records are
maintained as mandated and in such a way as to allow for accurate and ethical
reporting in compliance with law and regulation.
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 9
1. Documentation in the report Policy statement on
record keeping Job
Description GUIDE 20111219: President: Administrative and Fiscal Capacity and
Law |
2. Verification on site Student paper records may be found in the Institute admissions and
student services offices. Personnel records may be found in the President's Office. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Administrative
and Fiscal Capacity Standard 10: Contracts are in compliance with the law and
in keeping with policies of the larger institution, where applicable. Contracts are drafted with appropriate
guidance, undergo appropriate review, and are authorized by the appropriate
individual(s).
A. Required responses
1. List the
types of contracts (employee, vendors, third parties, etc.) entered into by the
program or language institution, and for each indicate who provides guidance,
reviews, and authorizes the contracts.
Type of contract |
Who provides guidance, reviews and authorizes these
contracts? |
MegaPath
IP Phone Service |
Chateaux
Software Development Corp and its president Ken Zimmerman (an member of the
Institute's outside Advisory Board) have provided technical guidance since
the 1980's. The contract is
reviewed by Paul Schiffman, Dean of Student Services and Dante V. Ferraro and
approved by consensus. |
Software
and Hardware Maintenance and Replacement |
Chateaux
Software Development Corp and its president Ken Zimmerman (an member of the Institute's
outside Advisory Board) have provided technical guidance since the
1980's. The contract is reviewed
by Paul Schiffman, Dean of Student Services and Dante V. Ferraro and approved
by consensus. |
Panix
for Internet Access |
Chateaux
Software Development Corp and its president Ken Zimmerman have provided
technical guidance since the 1980's.
The contract is reviewed by Paul Schiffman, Dean of Student Services
and Dante V. Ferraro and approved by consensus |
Ricoh
Printer Service |
Comparative
vendor shopping President and Dean Schiffman for technical guidance. The contract is reviewed by Paul
Schiffman, Dean of Student Services and Dante V. Ferraro and approved by
consensus |
Janitorial
Service |
Building
Management's recommendation. Jeff Gural, President,
Newmark & Company Real Estate and a member of the Institute's Advisory
Board since his father, Aaron Gural, retired from my father's Institute
Advisory Board on which he served since 1968). The contract is reviewed
by Paul Schiffman, Dean of Student Services and Dante V. Ferraro and approved
by consensus. |
Payroll
Preparation Services |
Contract
with ADP is reviewed by Paul Schiffman, Dean of Student Services and Dante V.
Ferraro and approved by consensus |
Employment
Contracts |
Employment
Contracts are oral, they are entered into between the President and the
employee upon consultation with the Deans and Chairs as deemed appropriate by
the President |
Agents
and recruiters |
|
Auditor
Services |
Comparative
interviewing and word of mouth recommendations prior to conversations between
President and Dean Schiffman resulted in the selection of Harvey Glick, CPA to provide
auditor services. Mr. Glick serve
as a member of the Institute's Advisory Board. The engagement terms are reviewed annually by Paul
Schiffman, Dean of Student Services and Dante V. Ferraro and approved by
consensus |
Accounting
Services |
Comparative
interviewing and word of mouth recommendations prior to conversations between
President and Dean Schiffman resulted in the selection of Steven Corwin to
provide tax preparation and accounting services. Mr.
Corwin currently serves on the Institute's Advisory Board. The terms of
engagement are reviewed annually and approved by consensus between the
President and the Dean of Student Services. |
Legal
Services |
Comparative
interviewing and word of mouth recommendation at the City Club of New York in
the 1970s between President Ferraro and M. David Distler, Esquire resulted in
the engagement of Mr. Distler to perform such legal services as from time to
time might be required by Spanish-American Institute. Continued engagement on a case by case
basis are reviewed and approved by consensus by Dean Schiffman and President
Ferraro. Mr. Distler currently
serves on the Institute's advisory Board. |
Educational
Management Services |
Spanish-American
Institute engages Instituto Hispano-Americano, Inc to provide such
Educational Management Services as from time to time are deemed appropriate
by Dean Schiffman and President Ferraro. Paul Schiffman and Dante V. Ferraro are Vice-President and
President respectively of Instituto Hispano-Americano, Inc. |
Management
Consulting Services |
Spanish-American
Institute engages Aubrey-Stewart Associates, Inc. on an annual basis to
provide management consulting services.
The agreement is reviewed by Dean Schiffman and the President and
renewed by consensus. |
Educational
Legal Professional Services |
DowLohnes
provides legal advice on an ad hoc, as needed basis. Specific assignments are completed
and billed at their customary hourly rate. The proposed engagements are reviewed by Dean Schiffman
and President Ferraro and approved by consensus. |
Davidoff
& Malito, Attorneys-at-Law |
Davidoff
& Malito provide legal and lobbying advice on an as needed, ad hoc
basis. They bill at their
customary hourly rates. The
engagements are reviewed by Dean Schiffman and President Ferraro and agreed
to by consensus. |
Immigration
Employment Consulting |
Alan
Lee, Esquire provides Immigration Employment legal services to the Institute
on an as needed basis. Billing
is at the customary per-application or hourly rate. The engagements are reviewed and approved by Dean
Schiffman and President Ferraro |
Malkin
& Ross, Attorneys-at-Law |
Malkin
& Ross provide general New
York State and Washington legal services. They are contracted on a case-by-case basis and bill at
their customary hourly rates.
The engagements are reviewed by Dean Schiffman and President Ferraro
and approved by consensus. |
B. Verification
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 10
1. Documentation in the report Catalog Volume 27 Spring
2012: Advisory Board Policy
and procedure statement regarding the drafting, reviewing and authorizing
contracts |
2. Verification on site The School Catalog may be found on site in the Faculty
Student-Services Associates' Offices. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 1: Admissions policies are consistent with
program objectives and with the mission of the program or language institution
(and with the host institution if applicable), and are implemented by properly
trained and authorized individuals.
The admissions process ensures that the student is qualified to enroll
in and benefit from the instructional program. Both the policies and the personnel who implement them
adhere to ethical standards and good practice.
A. Required responses
1. List
each English language program offered and its admission policies.
Educational
program |
Admission
policies |
ESL Plus Course of Study |
As
stated in the catalog: The
Institute welcomes applications from individuals seriously interested in
acquiring the knowledge and skills necessary for entry-level
employment. Applicants are accepted without regard to race, color,
national origin, creed, sex, or physical handicaps. Applicants
for admission to programs must have a high school diploma or equivalency and
be beyond the age of compulsory schooling. Applicants
for admission to individual courses need not be high school graduates. The
applicant must complete the Institute's "Application For Admission"
and return it to the school. An
interview will be arranged. The purpose of the interview is to explore
the applicant's career goals and abilities as they relate to the Institute's
programs and courses. Arrangements
will be jointly made by the applicant and the Institute to forward to the
Institute the applicant's official high school transcript of grades.
The Institute provides a release form for this purpose. Upon
acceptance and in accordance with New York State Education Department
Regulations, the applicant and Institute complete an "Enrollment
Agreement." The Agreement specifies all costs, payment methods,
and programs of instruction. Although
a personal interview is required of all applicants, out-of-town or foreign
students who register by mail and meet other requirements may schedule the
interview upon their arrival in New York. All interviews must be
completed prior to the start of classes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Explain how the admissions policies
listed above are directly related to the mission and objectives of the program
or language institution (and with the host institution if applicable).
SPANISH-AMERICAN Institute's
Admission Policy welcomes all interested parties to apply for admission. We are an open entry institution, so
potential students may apply at any time.
Our primary mission is to serve the non-English speaking population and
we do so without time constraints.
We are able to carry out our mission through our flexible and timely
admissions process.
3.
Explain how the admissions policies ensure that all students can be
accommodated in the program with regard to their ages, proficiency levels, and
other aspects of importance to the program or language institution, such as
number of students per course and heterogeneity of students.
As stated in our catalog, and
our website Spanish-American Institute ensures that all students will be
accommodated regardless of age, race, gender or language skills. Students are placed in the appropriate
level based on CELSA test results. Heterogeneity is assured by our "open door" policy
which welcomes students from all over the world. Brief advertisement appear regularly in many of the City's
ethnic papers and magazines including Japanese, Italian, Russian, French Turkish,
and Polish publications. Availability
of our school information on-line on our website has greatly expanded our oversees
reach in recent years. Faculty
Student-Services Associates currently serving students seeking admission speak
Spanish, French, Arabic, Turkish, Russian, Ukrainian, Tajik and the local
language of Burkina Faso.
4. Explain how the admissions process
ensures that an admitted student is qualified to enroll and able to benefit
from the instructional program.
The
admission process ensures that an admitted student is qualified to enroll by
requesting copies of prior school transcripts and through personal interviews
(in person, by phone, SKYPE or email) with each prospective student by
qualified Faculty Student-Services Associates who are familiar with the
Institute and its offerings due to their status as previous or current students
and their training with the President, supervision by the Dean of Student
Services and their peer-coaching observations.
The
admissions process ensures that an admitted student is able to benefit from the
instructional program by providing for personal contact with the student by
phone, Skype, email or in person.
The CELSA Placement Test assures that students are placed in the level
best suited to their current abilities.
5. Explain how the program or language
institution ensures that admissions personnel, including those authorized to
issue visa documents, adhere to ethical standards and good practice.
The Institute assures that admissions personnel including those authorized to issue visa documents adhere to ethical standards and good practices by:
· enunciating those policies in its publications (for example, in its Job Descriptions Guide, School Catalog and Faculty Handbook)
· providing for a period of pre-employment training by the President
· providing a period observation and peer coaching
· providing for continuous quality control and training by the Dean of Student Services once employment starts
· monitoring Faculty Student-Services Associates business email during their employment for training and quality control
· being sensitive to student and prospective comments and concerns relating to representations made during the admissions process and utilizing this knowledge in post-employment training conversations
· providing ongoing professional development opportunities
B. Verification
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 2: The program or language institution
provides academic and personal advising and counseling, as well as assistance
in understanding immigration regulations.
Such advice and assistance are provided in a timely and accurate manner
by qualified individuals.
A. Required responses
1. Explain how the program/institution
ensures that it provides students with a sufficient number of academic,
personal, and immigration advisors.
The
Institute Student Services offices are open and fully staffed from Monday
through Friday from 9 am to 9 pm.
The Institute's "open door" policy assures that students have
easy visual access to Faculty Student-Services Associates and feel comfortable
asking the receptionist to speak with one whenever they have questions or
concerns. With nine Faculty
Student-Services Associates and Dean of student Services offices, and 12 hours
of staffing each day, there are nearly 108 hours per day available to our
student body. Faculty
Student-Services Associates engaged in academic, personal and immigration
advising speak a dozen languages and have each had their own experiences as a student
of the Institute, almost all as student visa students.
The
President and the Dean of Student Services monitor enrollments and activity at
the reception area and adjust staffing to meet fluctuating demand of academic,
personal and immigration advisors.
2. Describe the means by which students
are informed of the availability of academic, personal, and immigration
advising.
Students
are informed of the availability of academic, personal and immigration advising
in the paper School Catalog and in the online version of the School Catalog.
3. Briefly describe the range of academic
advising provided, and explain how the program/institution ensures that such
advising is provided in a timely and accurate manner.
The
Institute ensures timely and accurate advising by maintaining and monitoring
student database information including attendance, academic progress and
immigration status.
The
Institute provides advising for students on academic warning and probation.
The
institute provides advising for students with poor attendance.
The
institute provides advising for students nearing immigration reporting
deadlines.
The
School Catalog covers areas of advising including:
The
Faculty Handbook covers areas of advising in Advising and Tutoring
The
Institute Counseling Plan includes advising and counseling guidelines and
procedures including:
The Job
Description Guide provides administrators, faculty and staff with guidance on
advising responsibilities including:
4. Briefly describe the personal advising
available, and explain how the program/institution ensures that such advising
is provided in a timely and accurate manner.
Faculty
Student-Services Associates are all holders of a BA or BS as well as holders of
New York State Department of Education Teachers Licenses. They are generally former or current
students engaged in on-campus employment.
They are at least bilingual and have a first hand knowledge of the Institute,
its programs, practices and procedures as well as an personal familiarity with
the difficulties faced by foreign students. These Faculty Student-Services Associates provide
enrollment, course selection, level placement, level advancement, visa
obligation fulfillment, school transfer-in and transfer-out assistance,
attendance and good academic standing advising.
The Institute
ensures that advising is provided in a timely manner by maintaining and
monitoring student record databases.
The
Institute ensures accuracy by testing for database integrity and by monitoring
Faculty Student-Services Associates activities and providing for ongoing
training and appropriate supervision by senior staff.
5. Briefly describe the immigration
advising provided, and explain how the program/institution ensures that such
advising is provided in a timely and accurate manner.
The Institute
provides immigration advising to students or prospective students on :
The Institute
ensures that advising is provided in a timely manner by maintaining and
monitoring student record databases.
The
Institute ensures accuracy by testing for database integrity and by monitoring
Faculty Student-Services Associates activities and providing for ongoing
training and appropriate supervision by senior staff.
6. Explain the policies and procedures in
place to ensure that students are referred to other qualified professionals,
services, or programs when the students’ needs exceed the resources and
expertise available within the program or institution.
Faculty
Student-Services Associates, Faculty and Staff only refer students to other
qualified professionals, services, or programs known to the Dean of Student
services or the President to be of recognized professional integrity in their
fields.
B. Verification
2. Verification on site School Catalogs may be found in the offices of the Faculty Student
Services Associates |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
The Counseling Plan should be updated to indicate where
electronic means have replace paper notification and tracking. The Counseling Plan should be updated
to more fully speak to the needs of foreign students (not the majority at the
Institute) rather than Ability-to-Benefit students on financial aid for whom it
was originally designed.
It is expected that this update will be accomplished by
Fall 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 3: The program or language institution
provides pre‑arrival and ongoing orientation (1) to support students in
their adjustment to the program or language institution (and to the host
institution if applicable) and to the surrounding culture and community, and
(2) to help them understand immigration regulations and procedures, as well as
health and safety issues.
A. Required responses
1. For each of the three kinds of student
orientation (pre-arrival, initial, and on-going), provide a timeline, general
overview, and brief description of the topics addressed. For each, indicate whether information
is provided in writing or orally, or both.
Information
is provided in writing in the School Catalog and on the Institute website as
well as orally for pre-arrival, initial and on-going orientation.
Topics
include obtaining a visa for pre-arrival students and maintaining a visa for
currently enrolled students and transfer-out to other institutions for students
nearing completion.
Academic
topics for pre-arrival students include placement procedure information,
elective subject selection and class hour time schedules available. For continuing students topics include
maintaining good academic standing, maintaining satisfactory attendance,
changing class levels, elective subjects, taking advantage of "Super
Intensive" options for additional hours at no additional cost, vacation
travel time abroad and obtaining F-2 status for children or spouses.
Initial
students will like to have a tour of the facility of course in order to get an
idea of their new surroundings before starting class.
2. State how the program or language
institution ensures that students are provided with and understand immigration
regulations that pertain to them.
The
Institute ensures that students are provided with and understand immigration
regulations that pertain to them by assuring that the Faculty Student-Services
Associates listen carefully to the students questions and assumptions and are
provided with up-to-date information by the PDSO and DSO on good
practices. The Institute receives
updated from SEVIS on evolving regulations and practices and disseminates this
to Faculty Student-Services Associates in a timely manner.
3. Explain how the program or language
institution ensures that out-of-country applicants understand the written
information that is sent to them.
The Institute
ensures that out-of-country applicants understand the written information that
is sent to them by training and maintaining a multilingual staff on hand twelve hours a day, five days a
week, to answer their questions in their native language by email, traditional telephone or SKYPE. Currently there are Faculty
Student-Services Associates on staff who are native speakers of Spanish, Portuguese,
French, Italian, Korean, Russian, Ukrainian, Tajik, and Turkish (at
least). Also, a large percent of prospective students
are recommended by current and former students who are able to provide them
with unbiased, firsthand impressions of the Institute and its personnel and
procedures.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Pre-arrival information
for students: |
2. Verification on site School Catalogs are available for inspection in Faculty Student-Services
Associates offices. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
none.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 4: The
program or language institution seeks to ensure that students understand
policies regarding enrollment and registration.
A. Required responses
1. State
the policies that govern enrollment and registration. Include the policies regarding cancellation of registration,
deadlines that apply, and refunds.
The Institute requires all students to sign
an enrollment agreement upon admission into the Institute. An Enrollment
Agreement includes:
·
title of course and course schedules,
·
statement of tuition and fees;
·
copy of the appropriate refund plan;
·
placement guarantee disclaimer;
·
signed verification that the student has received a copy of the school Catalog;
·
signed verification that the student has received a copy of the State disclosure
brochure;
·
signed verification of the agent who enrolled the student;
·
signed acceptance by the Institute;
·
documentation of high school completion or equivalent (if applicable);
·
documentation of request for official transcript; and
·
an ESL placement test result.
The
Institute provides tuition and fee charges in the Catalog or supplement and posts them at every admissions
desk. The student's individual financial record lists all charges as well
as payment dates, amounts, and balances due. The student and school also sign
an Enrollment Agreement with an effective date that lists all contractual
charges. The State Education Department approves all such enrollment
agreements, including the statement of its effective date. Any change in
tuition, fees, or other charges requires State approval of a new Agreement with
a new effective date.
The
Institute adheres to the refund policy in the Enrollment Agreement given to the
student at registration. It reads as follows:
I.
AFTER SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT BUT BEFORE STARTING CLASS THE SCHOOL KEEPS:
the non-refundable registration fee of the lesser of 10% of tuition or ONE
HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100) per course or program. (Registration fee is
additional to tuition but is deducted from last payment.)
II.
AFTER STARTING CLASSES THE SCHOOL KEEPS:
A.
The ONE HUNDRED DOLLAR ($100) registration fee per course or program PLUS the
stated cost of such textbooks, tools, materials, supplies, etc. as have been
issued by the school and accepted by the student, PLUS the school keeps
tuition.
1.
FOR QUARTER ENROLLMENTS (all courses): If termination occurs week #
1st Quarter of 1st Enrollment |
Quarter
1 or 2* of Subsequent Enrollments |
Subsequent
Quarters |
|
week
1 week
2 week
3 week
4 week
5 week
6 week
7 week
8 |
0% 20% 30% 40% 50% 50% 60% 100% |
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% |
25% 50% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% |
|
|
|
|
2.
FOR First-Time Students in TERM ENROLLMENTS (all programs), The school keeps:
For
withdrawal in: |
Term
1 |
2nd Term |
Subsequent
Terms* |
Week
# 1 |
0%
of the term tuition |
* |
20%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 2 |
20%
of the term tuition |
* |
35%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 3 |
20%
of the term tuition |
* |
50%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 4 |
30%
of the term tuition |
* |
70%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 5 |
40%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 6 |
40%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 7 |
50%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 8 |
50%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 9 |
60%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
Week
#10 |
100%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
3.
FOR Non-First Time Students in TERM ENROLLMENTS (all programs), The school
keeps:
For
withdrawal in: |
Term
1 |
2nd Term |
Subsequent
Terms* |
Week
# 1 |
0%
of the term tuition |
* |
20%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 2 |
20%
of the term tuition |
* |
35%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 3 |
35%
of the term tuition |
* |
50%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 4 |
50%
of the term tuition |
* |
70%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 5 |
70%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
Week
# 6 |
100%
of the term tuition |
* |
100%
of the term tuition |
*If
the student withdraws in the second term, the school must use the first term
schedule unless the school demonstrates that no significant educational change
occurred in the program as of the student's last date of attendance.
Significant Education Change is defined as non-functioning equipment which
adversely affects the student's program, material change in the student's
schedule as agreed to at enrollment, substitution of teacher in a course after
instruction begins if the teacher does not possess necessary language skills in
approved language of instruction in order to effectively communicate subject
matter to students, or significant increase in student-teacher ratio.
4.
FOR ENROLLMENTS OF MORE THAN TWELVE MONTHS:
A
student who cancels during the first twelve months is refunded all monies in
advance for the second twelve months or part thereof.
5.
FOR ENROLLMENTS UNDER THE TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (TAP): The total
program tuition is divided by four. Program length: 64 weeks.
Term #1=16 weeks; #2=16 weeks; #3=16 weeks; #4-16 weeks.
ALL
REFUNDS ARE MADE WITHIN THRITY (30) DAYS. Although not required, written
notice of cancellation is recommended. Refunds are computed as of the
last date of recorded attendance. Failure of the student to notify the
director in writing of withdrawal may delay refund of tuition due pursuant to
Section 5002 of the Education Law.
Diplomas,
Certificates of Completion and academic transcripts are not issued until the
student meets all requirements and monetary obligations.
Students
dismissed for improper conduct, poor attendance, failing progress, or tuition
arrears are not relieved of financial obligations as specified in this Enrollment
Agreement.
2. Describe how this information is made
available to students before they complete the registration and enrollment
process.
Prior to registration, a personal interview
with a Faculty Student-Services Associate or Dean is
conducted.
At that time, students receive a School
Catalog, and sign to verify that it was received.
3. Explain the procedures that are in
place to ensure comprehension of English language materials and information by
students with limited English proficiency before they sign any contractual
documents or make tuition and fee payments for the term in which they are about
to enroll.
If Faculty Student-Services
Associates have concerns regarding a students’ comprehension of the materials,
bilingual personnel are called in to assist in the translating of key elements.
In rare cases, they may seek the
assistance of current students who are from the same country to assist in the
orientation process.
B. Verification
2. Verification on site School Catalogs are available for inspection in the Faculty
Student-Services Associates offices. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1. None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 5:
Students have access to health insurance if required and, in all cases,
students are informed about the need for adequate health insurance coverage.
A. Required responses
1. Is
health insurance required of any students in the program or language
institution?
_____ yes (Respond to 2 below.)
__x_ no (Respond to 3 below.)
2. If yes, describe the health insurance
requirements that are in effect at the program or language institution.
3. If no, explain how the program provides
students with comprehensible written information about the consequences/risks
or failure to maintain adequate coverage.
Students are informed of
local health clinics and low-cost health-care suppliers via the Institute’s
catalog and the Student Bulletin Board.
4. If the program or language institution
requires or recommends specific medical insurance, describe how this insurance
meets the needs of the program’s students. State how students are informed of the application process,
costs, and covered services.
NA. The institute does not recommend
specific medical insurance.
5. Explain the procedures that are in
place to ensure comprehension of English language information about all aspects
of health insurance (such as covered services, deductibles, co-payments, length
and renewal of coverage) by students who may not understand the concept of
personal health insurance responsibility.
Course
content in the early levels of ESL instruction, cover units on health, health
insurance and all the terminology associated with it.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Written statement given
to students regarding insurance options and consequences of failure to have
coverage are provided in the School Catalog at the location linked below: and on the school
website at this link: |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to seek out
low-cost health insurance providers for our students. This will be done in Summer 2012.
2.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to post, both on
our website and student bulletin board, more detailed information regarding the
risks of not carrying health insurance in the United States. This will be done in Summer 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 6: Students have access to social and
recreational activities that provide a cultural context for their language
acquisition and other studies, as appropriate.
A. Required responses
1.
Provide a list of typical social and recreational activities offered to
students by the program or language institution and indicate how students are
informed of activities and costs.
Student Space: The Institute always provided students
with a Student Room where they could meet and socialize informally. In
2004, the school added about 1000 square feet of new space, the Founders’
Special Events Center, where students can meet, read, relax, etc. We also
encourage current and former students to use the space to showcase their
artistic accomplishments in exhibits open to the public and entire school
population.
Student Bike Club: The school has
purchased several bicycles that it provides to students for occasional
school-organized bike tours of Manhattan with faculty and staff. These
tours are free of charge to students.
Student Club Newsletters: Since 2005, the
Institute has published a Student Club
Newsletter 10 to 12 times a year. The Newsletter always contains a description of a major American
holiday and listings of mainly free NYC activities as well as other items of
interest to international students. The listed activities provide subway
directions for students who may be unfamiliar with the public transportation system.
Current issues of the Newsletter
are distributed to all students, faculty, and staff and may be mailed or
e-mailed to students’ and alumni. They are also posted on the school’s
Bulletin Boards. Current and back issues are available on-line at the
school website.
Student and Alumni Special Exhibits: The Spanish-American
Institute also hosts and publicizes special art exhibits and performances of
talented current and former students.
2.
Provide a list of typical social and recreational activities made available to
students in the community and on campus, if applicable, and briefly describe
how students are informed of activities and costs.
The
Spanish-American Institute’s has developed extracurricular student activities
that best meet the needs of our particular demographic of non-native speaking
adult commuter students in an urban environment. International students,
in particular, are eager to learn more about American culture and to experience
New York City. They are eager to experience the City’s inexpensive or,
better still, free amenities, which they can explore in accordance with their
individual schedules and interests. Therefore, the school actively
encourages and supports extra-curricular student activities that:
·
help students
to explore the cultural and recreational richness of New York City;
·
introduce them
to environments requiring their use and understanding of English in real world
contexts; and
·
acquaint them
with various aspects of American culture.
Guidance and Supervision: The Institute provides
guidance for such activities through frequent postings in school newsletters
and on bulletin boards about recommended activities, with detailed information
about schedules and transportation directions. In addition, the Institute
provides direct supervision for specific activities such as the Student Bike
Club. As the only
Institute-sponsored off-campus activity, the Bike Tours are personally
supervised by the President.
Free Concert Tickets and Theatre Discount
Vouchers:
Through a business-community relationship, the Institute receives free tickets
for concerts at Carnegie Hall and other prominent sites that it makes available
free to students, faculty, and staff. Faculty and staff are encouraged to
accompany students to these concerts. The school also provides students
with discount theatre vouchers to Broadway and off-Broadway performances, to
the New York City Opera, and to the New York City Ballet.
School Bulletin Boards: The Institute has
installed large bulletin boards in the Student Room and outside the Special
Events Center with frequently updated postings such as free NYC activities,
free museum admissions and concerts, free inoculations through the NYC
Department of Health, free or nominal NYC Parks Department recreation center
memberships, and other cultural, health, and recreational information of
interest to our primarily international students.
3. State how the program or language
institution ensures that sufficient numbers of personnel accompany students on
activities sponsored by the program, institution, host institution, or other
contracted agencies/entities.
There are no contracted agencies or
entities. The Institute provides direct
supervision for specific activities such as the Student Bike Club and visits
with faculty to local restaurants and cultural sites. The Institute limits off-site,
school-sponsored activities to Bike Tours which are personally supervised by
the President.
4. Explain how the program or language institution
ensures that faculty and students are informed of and understand the health,
safety, and emergency concerns associated with social and recreational
activities.
Activities
are posted on the Student Bulletin Board, as well as Spanish-American Institute's
website. Students are required to
sign up. The institute limits
school-sponsored, off-site activities to Bike Tours personally supervised by the
President.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report My Favorite Bike Tour Promotional materials for
student events Student Survey on
social/recreational activities Example
of "English through the Arts" student exhibit brochure A
Video Example of Special Events Center Student "English through the
Arts" activity Example of Local Artist contribution
to "English through the Arts" Series Photos of Student Club
in-school activities and Bike Tours may be viewed on: |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
Faculty often inquire about taking students to
various events. It is imperative that
the institution establish a formal policy in the faculty handbook.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 7: The program or language institution
clearly states and fulfills its responsibilities regarding student housing.
A. Required responses
1. Describe the program’s or language
institution’s position regarding its responsibility for the provision of
student housing. Indicate where
this position is described to students.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE
does not provide housing for students.
2. If the program or language institution
provides or arranges housing, check the housing options that are available:
The
Institute does not provide or arrange housing.
_____ residence halls/dormitories
_____ apartments
_____ apartment referrals
_____ homestays
_____ other (list below)
3. Explain how the program or language
institution ensures the accuracy of the written information disseminated to
students about housing, whether by the program/institution, host institution,
or a contracted agent/entity either inside or outside of the country.
The only information
disseminated to students by the Institute about housing is that which is
provided in the School Catalog.
The Institute does not maintain or recommend housing alternative to
prospective or current student.
Spanish-American Institute
does not engage contract agents or entities inside or outside the country to
provide housing information to students.
4. If
homestays are available, indicate whether the service is provided by the
program or language institution, or by a contracted agency/entity. Describe the procedures in place to
ensure that students are informed of homestay policies in writing, families are
appropriately screened and monitored, and emergency procedures are in place.
NA
5. If apartments or residence hall housing
is made available to students by the program or a contacted agency/entity,
describe how the program ensures that the housing is a safe, clean, livable
environment.
NA
6. Explain how the program or language institution
fulfills the requirement to have an employee personally inspect all contracted
accommodation.
NA
7. Describe the policies and procedures in
place to investigate all housing complaints promptly and solve problems without
delay.
NA
8. Describe on-going procedures to
determine student satisfaction with housing.
NA
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Policy on Student Housing in
School Catalog |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1. None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student Services Standard 8: The program or language institution
clearly states and consistently provides the extent of student services
described in any written, electronic, or oral promotional information or in
agreements.
A. Required responses
1. Explain how the program or language
institution ensures that all written, electronic, and oral promotional
information contains accurate information about the student services provided,
including information provided by a contracted service or third party.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE
student support staff is continuously and regularly updating all student
service information. The student
bulletin boards are checked weekly, and the Dean of Students updates and
regulates all postings regarding student services on the Institution’s webpage.
2. Are any student services contracted
out?
_____ yes
__x__ no
3. If yes, explain how the program
verifies that such services are provided as promised.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report School Catalog on Student
Services Offered |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1. SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE will create a bulletin board on the webpage that links students
directly to student service events in one location. Summer 2012, in place by September 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Recruiting
Standard 1: All program or language
institution personnel follow ethical standards for recruiting students and
promoting programs, and they ensure that the program or language institution’s
policies and procedures are made clear to prospective students and/or student
sponsors. In any recruitment
transaction, the students' interests and well‑being are paramount.
A. Required responses
1. Indicate
the positions and personnel within the program or language institution, if any,
who are responsible for recruiting.
The
Institute does not utilize formal recruiters. Admissions staff conduct
in-house interviews with interested prospective students to determine their
needs and to factually describe to them the courses and programs deemed most
appropriate.
2. If a
university or college program, indicate the positions and personnel within the
college or university who recruit students for the language program.
NA
3. Indicate
other parties, if any, to whom recruiting activities are delegated.
NA
4. Check any
of the following to indicate how the program or institution ensures that
everyone to whom recruiting activities are delegated is trained to describe all
aspects of the program or institution accurately to students.
__x__
training materials
__x__ regular
orientation and/or program updates
__x__ staff
meetings
__x__ advising manuals
__x__ student
feedback
____ (virtual)
__ X__ campus visits/familiarization tours
_____ visits
to offices of third parties
_____ other
(Complete 5 below.)
5. List other
training not included in 4 above.
6. Describe
how the program monitors all those to whom recruiting is delegated to ensure
that they follow ethical behavior.
All
Institute admissions representatives are licensed as private school agents by
the New York State Education Department. The President interviews new admissions
personnel to orient them to school policies, admissions objectives, standards,
procedures, etc. He walks them through an orientation packet that
includes copies of the Catalog, enrollment forms, pertinent State and
Federal regulations, accreditation criteria, and other relevant
materials.
As
part of their orientation, new representatives observe the daily routine of the
Admissions department, including sitting in on applicant interviews. This
provides them with a first-hand opportunity to observe procedures and to ask
questions. During the final phase of their orientation, they reverse
roles with an experienced Admissions staff member. The new representative
conducts the admissions procedure under the direct supervision of a senior
staff member, the Dean of Students. After the orientation period, the
Dean of Students continually monitors them. The President and/or Dean
is/are available at any time to assist them in any unusual circumstance.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Faculty Handbook
policy statement on recruiting |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1. While the
Institute has no recruiters, admissions staff often give information regarding
classes and programs. Thus, it
would be beneficial to have set guidelines for the staff to follow when dealing
with inquiry calls/requests. SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE will generate a guided conversation for the admissions staff that
ensures all inquires will be dealt with in a professional and ethical
manner. Summer 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Recruiting
Standard 2: All print, electronic,
and oral information used to recruit students is accurate and complete.
A. Required responses
1. Check the
types of materials and activities used to recruit students.
_____
brochures
__x__
advertisements
____ video
presentations
__x__
electronic media
__x__
electronic social networking
_____
presence of personnel at recruiting fairs
_____
presence of personnel at conferences
_____
relationships with agencies that recruit students
_____
interactions with agencies, government departments or other groups that
provide scholarships and sponsorship to students
_____ other
(Complete 2 below.)
2. List other
types of materials and activities used to recruit students not listed in 1
above.
NA
3. State how
the program or institution ensures that written, electronic and oral
information conveyed to students is accurate and complete, including
information about admission requirements, fees, the academic program and
calendar, student services, and facilities.
The President and the Dean of Students review all
materials regarding the admission process, the fees, course starting dates,
student services available and SPANISH-AMERICAN Institute's facilities prior to
those materials getting posted or distributed.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report Web URL with information
for prospective students Facebook "Student Club"
page URL |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1.
Describe the follow up activities, with timelines,
that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language institution’s
practices under this standard.
If no action is planned, indicate “none.”
None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Recruiting
Standard 3: If a program or language institution has recruiting agreements or
contracts with a third party, the program or institution ensures that it has
complete information about the third party, assumes responsibility for
monitoring the third party, and terminates the agreement if necessary.
A. Required responses
1. Does the
program or language institution have agreements or contracts with a third party
to promote, provide advice, or recruit for the program or institution?
_x___ no
(If no, do not respond further.)
_____ yes (If
yes, respond to 2 - 4 below.)
2.
State how the program or institution ensures that it has complete
information about the third party, including fees charged to students.
3. State how
the program or institution ensures that the third party has accurate and
complete information about educational programs, student services, facilities,
fees, and relationship to a host institution, if any.
4. State how the program or institution
monitors the third party to ensure that it is providing accurate information to
students and others, and that it adheres to ethical practice. Include a statement of how the program or
language institution would terminate the third party if unacceptable practice
becomes evident.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report NA - - - Since
the Institute does not have agreements or contracts with a third party
to promote, provide advice, or recruit for the program or institution, this
section is left blank. |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Length and Structure of Program of
Study Standard 1: The calendar states the number of terms per year, the number
of weeks per term and the number of hours of instruction per week. The calendar is consistent with and
supportive of the program or language institution’s stated mission and goals.
A. Required responses
1. Present the program’s or language
institution’s calendar for each instructional program or curriculum in the
table below.
|
Program/curriculum: ESL-Plus
Course of Study |
Program/curriculum: |
Program/curriculum: |
# of
start dates per year |
12 |
|
|
# of
terms per year |
4 |
|
|
# of
weeks per term |
12 |
|
|
# of
hours per week |
20 |
|
|
2. If any part of a given term for a
program/curriculum has a reduced number of hours, describe the affected
period(s) (e.g. first/orientation week, campus break weeks, holiday periods,
last/finals week, etc.). Indicate
how the term or total course hours are impacted and how delivery of planned
course curriculum is ensured.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE provides
an open-entry, self-paced program.
Students move through the curricular goals, objectives and outcomes at
his/her own pace. Bi-monthly exams
indicate if a student is ready to progress to the next level. Each course within the ESL Plus Program
of Study, has a recommended number of hours; however, students may complete the
course prior to completing the number of hours. All holidays and other campus
breaks are not counted towards the number of hours. The number of hours solely reflects the number of hours a
student has spent in the classroom.
3. If terms within the program are not of
equal length (such as a summer term with fewer weeks than other terms), explain
how the planned curriculum for the course or level for the longer or shorter
term is adapted to ensure consistent delivery of curriculum objectives.
The program does not have set
terms. Students enroll in sessions
of three months, six months, nine months or twelve months. The basic module of
enrollment is therefore three months, four hours per day, five days per
week. This three month module
therefore totals 240 classroom hours per "term". A student may begin the second Monday
of each month.
4. Indicate the total number of class
hours in the instructional component of the program term. Indicate the number of hours per term
devoted to each type of activity.
|
Program/curriculum: ESL-Plus
Course of Study |
Program/curriculum: |
Program/curriculum: |
total
hours in the term |
240 |
|
|
faculty-led
classroom instruction |
240 |
|
|
Testing |
5 |
|
|
counseling
and on-going orientation |
2 |
|
|
outside
lecturers or presentations |
0 |
|
|
faculty-led
language laboratory/media center |
48 |
|
|
independent
student use of laboratory/media center |
0 |
|
|
field
trips |
0 |
|
|
social
events |
1 |
|
|
other: |
|
|
|
other: |
|
|
|
other: |
|
|
|
5. Does the program/institution admit
students at times other than program start dates or have rolling open
enrollment dates?
_x___ yes
_____ no
6. If yes, explain how the flow of terms
for such students is managed to ensure that the promised curriculum is
delivered sequentially in the way outlined in the curriculum guide.
Students
attend four class hours per day, five days per week for a total of 20 hours per
week. Teachers in each class hour
at a given ESL level use the same textbooks and follow the lessons
sequentially. Over the course of
the period of enrollment, students therefore have many opportunities to review
each of the units in the assigned textbook with different teachers and
different classmates. The repetition
from the different perspectives
that different teachers and groups of classmates, at different points in time
during the course of the period of enrollment, assures that the student masters
and retains mastery of each unit's content.
7. Check where the program/institution
calendar (start dates, lengths of terms, hours per week, etc.) is made
available.
__x__ program/institution brochure
__x__ pre-arrival material
__x__ student class schedules
__x__ website
__x__ student handbook
_____ advertisements
_____ other (list below)
B. Verification
Length and Structure of Program of Instruction Standard 1
2.
Verification on site School Catalogs with Calendar are available to the visit team in
Institute offices |
C. Program/language institution self-recommendations
1. Describe the follow up activities, with
timelines, that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language
institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate “none.”
1. SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE will
generate a learning path document for each student to show how a student can progress
through the program with the suggested amount of time in each level. Fall 2012.
SECTIONS BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE SELF-STUDY.
For
site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Length and Structure of Program of
Study Standard 2: The program or language institution’s curricular design
clearly indicates the levels of instruction and specifies how students progress
through a full program of study.
A. Required responses
1. Provide pass/fail and progression data
documenting patterns of student movement through the levels and the program.
On the
December 11, 2011 Bi-monthly Examinations of 770 students tested, 651 (84%)
received a GPA of 2.0 or higher (Pass-Fail
GPA Tab Rate Data for Dec 12 2011 Bi-monthly ExamsBook1.xls) .
On the
December 11, 2011 Bi-monthly Examinations of 2251 student examinations, 1801
(80%) received a grade of "C" or higher (Pass-Fail
Rate Data for Dec 12 2011 Bi-monthly Exams.xls).
Data for
this review was taken from the Grade Labels affixed to student permanent record
cards for the Bi-monthly Examination on the week ending Sunday, December 11,
2011 (Copy
of Permanent Student Record Grade Labels Bi-Montlly Exams Dec 11 2011.doc).
In a
study of 1094 students who began a three month session between January 1, 2010
and November 1, 2011, it was found that 294 (26%) attended less than 80
days. Therefore 75% were retained
beyond 90% of the icalendar days in their initial session (retainSTUDY Raw Data.doc Retain
Study Data Sort.xls).
Patterns
of student movement through the levels and the program are revealed in the
"How Long" Study (Data from "How Long"
Study: Analyzing how long 24,000 students-section hours since 1988 remained in
Level I). This analysis of
over 24,000 student-session-hours in Level 3 since 1988 showed that the median
and average time time spent by students in Level 3 sections was 49 days. At four hours per day, five days per
week this is equal to 140 class hours.
2. Are student learning outcomes for each
level met at consistent rates across levels?
__X__ yes
_____ no
3. If no, indicate the level(s) where
promotion is under average and state the reasons why students do not progress.
4. Explain how the program or language
institution has established that courses/levels are the right length and have
the appropriate number of hours for delivery of the established curricular
load.
The Institute
has established that the courses/levels are the right length by providing for
individual differences and learning styles with its individualized achievement
mastery level change policy. discussions with publishers of the NorthStar and WorldView
textbooks utilized confirm this assessment.
5. Explain how the program or language
institution has established that the instructional time allotted for each
course/level is adequate for students to achieve the student learning outcomes
of that course/level.
The
Institute has proviced a Mothod of Instruction which allows for varying rates
of learning and learning styles by allowing students to repeat units until
mastery is achieved (School Catalog,
Volume 27 Spring 2012: Method of
Instruction). Discussions with
WorldView and NorthStar publishers indicate that the time alloted when coupled
with allowable repeats properly assures that students are afforded the
opportunity to maximize their time at the Institute.
6. Explain how the program or language
institution has established that the length and number of hours of the program
as a whole is appropriate for students to master the student learning outcomes
and achieve the proficiency level(s) required for exit from the program.
The
institute has established that the length and number of hours of the program as
a whole is appropriate for students to master the student learning outcomes and
achieve the proficiency level(s) required from the course of study by studying
the length of time students remain in a given level, comparing that with the
pass-rate scores. In addition the
Institute has held discussions with NorthStar/Pearson publishers of the
textbooks used to determine that our practices and delivery methods are suitable
to these ends. Current Student
Survey and one-on-one discussiions with students confirm this assessment.
B. Verification
Length and Structure of Program of Instruction Standard 2
1.
Documentation in the report Data on pass/failrates:
Data on retention: Data on patterns of student movement through the levels and the
program: |
2.
Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution self-recommendations
1. Describe the follow up activities, with
timelines, that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language
institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is
planned, indicate “none.”
The
Institute will devise additional methodologies to evaluate pass/fail and
retension rates by First Quarter 2013.
SECTIONS BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE SELF-STUDY.
For
site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student
Achievement Standard 1: The program or language institution has a placement
system that is consistent with its admission requirements and allows valid and
reliable placement of students into levels.
A. Required responses
1. List the
placement test, series of tests, or other evaluative procedures for initial
placement of students into the instructional program, and for each level, skill
area, or course for which there is a separate or additional placement
assessment procedure.
Students
are placed into their appropriate level via the CELSA (Combined English
Language Skills Assessment) placement test. Additionally, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE is in the process
of implementing an exit assessment for each course. After much research in teacher-developed test, SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE is moving towards using the publisher- generated assessments for the
NorthStar series. First, it is
recognized that teacher –generated exams differ greatly from one
instructor to another. Secondly,
NorthStar exams are built upon the outcomes presented in the NorthStar
series. These outcomes are in line
with the student learning outcomes on the syllabi and meet the overall goals of
the courses.
2. Describe
the overall testing process by which students are initially assessed and placed
into a level in the instructional program. State how the means of assessment
are kept secure.
After
the initial admission process, and a student meets with a Faculty
Student-Services Associate. They
are then scheduled for a CELSA test.
Students are given the CELSA in a secure, monitored environment. Since there isn’t a testing schedule,
students often test alone with a member of SPANISH-AMERICAN Institute's
staff. Students are not to have
any texts, cell phones or other materials with them during the testing process.
3. Explain
whether an initial placement decision can be altered or refined after the initial
assessment period and, if so, how.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE recognizes that while CELSA is a strong placement tool, there are
other factors that may impact a students result, i.e. sickness, lack of sleep,
etc. Therefore, students are both
informally and formally assessed their first few days in class to ensure the
level is the most appropriate for the student. Teachers assess new students orally and aurally, as well as
through written homework and in-class writing and reading activities. If it is suspected a student has been
misplaced, a student will meet with a Division Chair or the Dean of Academic
Affairs for a diagnostic test.
These diagnostics are generated from publisher support materials for our
core texts, NorthStar. Diagnostics
are organized by student learning outcomes, thus indicating if a student has
mastered student learning outcomes for a level or not.
4. For each
procedure or instrument, explain how validity has been established and is
maintained. Specifically, state
how placement procedures and instruments and interpretation of results have
been aligned with the levels in the curriculum.
CELSA
is a widely used placement tool.
The validity of the CELSA is .93.
Thus, making it an ideal instrument for placement. The proficiency scales
and descriptors of each level align with the student learning outcomes for each
of our levels. Since SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE has only been using CELSA for a
short time for placement, it is currently in the process of monitoring results
closely. Currently, reports are
being generated on a monthly basis that indicate student CELSA placement, time
spent in placed level, and achievement of student learning outcomes via
assessments. This data should show
us that validity of how well the placement tool aligns with our program
curriculum.
5. For each
procedure or instrument, explain how reliability of placement results is
ensured from cycle to cycle.
The
Dean of Academic Affairs works with the Dean of Students to review movements of
students. There have been very few
cases where students are moved from initial placement. However, if any student is moved, that
student is monitored for achievement in the level to which they were moved. Criteria looked at includes: time spent in level, achievement on
bi-monthly exam, and ability to master student learning outcomes through both
bi-monthly assessments and exit exam.
B. Verification
Student Achievement Standard 1
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1. SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE needs to establish a formal bi-annual review policy of the CELSA and
student movement through courses.
By adding a page in our SchoolWorks student information system, we will
be able to track a student's initial placement score (raw number) and how long
a student spends in a level. This
data would be useful in assessing our cut scores on the CELSA. Fall 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student
Achievement Standard 2: The program or language institution documents in
writing whether students are ready to progress to the next level or to exit the
program of study, using instruments or procedures that appropriately assess the
achievement of student learning outcomes for courses taken within the
curriculum.
A. Required responses
1. Describe
how the program or language institution has determined that its student
learning outcomes represent significant achievement relative to the norms of
the field. (See Appendix A.)
During
2010-2011 SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE Administration, with the input of faculty,
worked towards establishing an outcomes-based curriculum. This outcome-based curriculum focuses
primarily on measuring student learning based on student learning outcome
statements. These outcome statements
have been generated with careful review and consideration of best practices in
the field of ESL. First,
proficiency standards or levels were established. These proficiency levels are descriptors of the learners and
their abilities with the language.
From these, measurable and observable student learning outcomes were
generated.
Student
learning outcomes for each course were carefully established with review of
TESOL’s Adult Language Proficiency Standards and CEF (Common European
Framework) Level Descriptors. Both
TESOL’s Standards and CEF’s level descriptors are grounded in solid research
and illustrate current best practices in the field. These standards and descriptors are the foundation of our
courses. Each standard and level
descriptor represents achievement in the language learning.
Qualitative
and quantitative data are being collected to measure student progression
through the levels and their achievement of our newly implemented student
learning outcomes. Since this has
been a relatively new endeavor for SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE, little data is
available. However, SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE recognizes the need and the value of collecting such data to make
future programmatic changes to both our student learning outcomes and
assessment practices.
2. Indicate
the primary tools, methods, or instruments used to assess student progress
within the term.
Due
to our open entry policy, terms are not formally outlined. However, long ago SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE established a practice for assessing student progress on a bi-monthly
basis. That is there is a formal
assessment of all learners weeks 8, 16 and 24 for each level.
The
tools for these assessments are publisher-generated exams that correlate with
course content. The reason that SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE moved in this direction was to ensure that all students, at each
level, would be responsible for mastering the outcomes for that level
regardless of his/her teacher, or time of class. Prior to making that change, individual teachers were
responsible for generating the bi-monthly exams. While our teachers are trained, they are not experts in test
development, and particularly test development to adequately measure SLOs. Thus, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE
Administration felt it best to move in this direction. We feel confident that our new practice
will ensure that each student in a particular level will have the skills and
knowledge he or she needs to progress to the next level, and most importantly
be successful in that level.
Bi-monthly
exams are given in the classes the students are registered in and evaluated by
the teachers. Furthermore, all
bi-monthly exam scores are entered into our student information system,
SchoolWorks. In addition to
bi-monthly exams, teachers continuously assess learning through homework, class
assignments, oral presentations and writing assignments.
Lastly,
for each level there is an exit exam as well. SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE recognizes that each bi-monthly
exam measures content taught from one bi-monthly exam to another; however,
there is a need to measure all course outcomes in one exam as well. Thus, we are in the process of
establishing an exit exam system for each course. Again, this has been generated from publisher exams. However, these exams have been created
to assess all student learning outcomes for a level, rather than particular
units or groups of units. Students
may take these exams after all coursework has been completed in a particular
level, or at the discretion of the instructor. If the instructor feels a student is ready to progress to
the next level, the instructor may opt to give that student the exit exam in
lieu of the bi-monthly exam. Like
bi-monthly exams, exit assessments are entered into our SchoolWorks information
system.
3. Does the
program or language institution use published standardized instruments to
establish course or level achievement?
_____ yes
_x___ no
4. If yes,
list the instrument(s) used; explain how they are proven to align with the
curriculum, course goals and objectives, and how they are proven to assess the
student learning outcomes for the level assessed.
5. Does the
program or language institution use faculty-made assessment instruments to
establish level achievement?
_____ yes
__x__ no
6. If yes, list the instrument(s) used; explain how they
are proven to align with the curriculum, course goals and objectives, and how
they are proven to assess the student learning outcomes for the level assessed.
7. List any
other assessment tools or methods used by the program or language institution
to demonstrate level achievement of the program’s stated student learning
outcomes. Explain how these tools
or methods are proven to align with the curriculum, course goals and
objectives, and how they are proven to assess the student learning outcomes
assessed.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE
uses publisher-created assessment tools to measure student learning
outcomes. These tools are provided
to SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE with the teaching materials of the adopted
text. The text was selected
primarily due to the fact it aligned with SPANISH-AMERICAN Institute's
programmatic goals, as well as the student learning outcomes in each of the
levels offered. Each component on
the assessment tool can be traced to a course goal, and in turn, a particular
student learning outcome.
8. Describe
the data that is collected on student achievement for level-to-level
progression and exit from the program.
Explain how this data, collectively, is used to inform the program or
language institution’s assessment practices.
Through the SchoolWorks database,
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE is able to collect student bi-monthly exams as well
as other critical information to assess student progression. Additionally, we are currently
employing a web-based tool to support our classroom instruction. We have set up this tool with a program
administration function. This
allows us to easily generate reports on each student, in each course, within a
particular level. We cannot only
see each student’s activity results and scores, but we can view an entire class
average or a student average. We
are even able to generate reports on question analysis. This is critical. If many students are missing a certain
question, we can assess student learning, as well as teaching and outcome achievement
as well.
Using both data from
SchoolWorks and MyEnglishLabs we can make informed decisions about teaching,
curriculum and student placement.
First, if certain classes are not scoring well in a particular learning
outcome, we can bring this to the attention of the teacher, so learning
activities could be modified.
Secondly, if we see students are not successful in an area due to lack
of previous learning, we can modify curricula to include the area. Lastly, if students are placed in a
certain level and are not successful in the level (through both bi-monthly
exams and MyEnglishLabs work) we need to look at our placement cut scores and
better align them with our student learning outcomes for each level.
9. Describe how language learning and assessment research
has informed the program or language institution’s practices in this area.
During our last Institutional
Effectiveness Plan (2009-2014) Spanish-American Institute made a strong
commitment to deeper researching and investigating language learning and
assessment research. Several
changes were made to our ESL Plus Courses due to our research. First, we needed a new placement
instrument. Our former placement
instrument was not aligned with our overall programmatic goals, thus we moved
towards adopting the CELSA. Secondly,
it was clear that we did not have measurable and observable student learning
outcomes for each course. Thus,
new outcomes were written. Third, SPANISH-AMERICAN
Institute's courses did not have objectives and goals that aligned with the new
student learning outcomes.
Therefore, they were modified.
Lastly, it was determined that courses needed a tool to better assess
student learning in the class and once a student completed a class. Therefore,
we moved towards adopting a web-based tool, MyEnglishLabs. We are using the publisher-generated
unit assessments, so we are providing teachers with a uniform, streamlined
tool. Additionally, an exit exam
is currently being generated through MyEnglishLabs to measure overall student
achievement.
This critical work has all
been undertaken since 2009 when we first wrote our IEP. It was at that time that we realized we
needed to move towards a greater outcomes based curricula and towards the
culture of assessment of both students, but also courses and their
effectiveness in delivering course objectives.
B. Verification
Student Achievement Standard 2
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE needs to review, adopt and implement set rubrics for each level for
both oral and written assignments.
Currently, each teacher is responsible for aligning student progress in
mastering student learning outcomes for each assignment. While the responsibility should fall on
the instructor, it is imperative that SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE provides the
teachers with a tool to adequately assess and ensure that the tools are uniform
across all levels. Fall 2012.
2. SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to continue to stay abreast
of current best practices in language learning and assessment. A cycle will be established to review
data of bi-monthly assessments and exit exams. This data will be presented to administration and faculty to
aid in the making of curricular decisions every quarterly meeting. Fall 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student
Achievement Standard 3: The program or language institution maintains and
provides students with written reports that clearly indicate levels of language
proficiency attained as a result of instruction.
A. Required responses
1. Check each
component of the system for reporting each student’s attained language
proficiency that is in place.
_x__ written
report given to the student that states the name and level of the course
_x___ written
report given to the student that includes a grade, score, mark or narrative
indicating the degree to which the student has mastered course requirements
_x___
proficiency scale showing the range of possible levels of proficiency in
the program
_____
interpretation of the proficiency scale
2. If any of
these components are not on the written report, state where they are readily
accessible to students, parents, employers, sponsors or admissions officers (as
legally permitted).
The
only item currently not detailed on the student report, is an interpretation of
the proficiency scale. This is
available in the Dean of Academic Affairs office and the Division Chairs of
English.
3. Describe
how the proficiency scale and the interpretation of the scale are linked to
course goals and objectives and student learning outcomes.
The
ESL Plus Course of Study offers six levels of ESL. Through the intense revision process SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE began in 2009, it was determined that our test did not correlate with
course goals, objectives and student learning outcomes. Thus, as part of our internal review
process for our Institutional Effectiveness Plan, when a new test was chosen,
it was done so to best align with our new course goals, objectives and
SLOs. Currently, these courses
directly correlate with the six levels of proficiency determined by the CELSA.
4. Does the
course grade, score or mark include factors that are not proficiency-related,
such as attendance, effort, or completion of homework?
_x__ yes
_____ no
5. If yes,
state how the program/institution’s reporting practices make clear that direct,
concrete evidence of proficiency and mastery is distinguished from indirect
indicators of student performance.
While
a student's grade is directly influenced by attendance and homework, a student's
language ability is marked by his or her performance on both the bi-monthly
assessments and the exit exams.
These are both outlined on a student's grade report. However, a student's ability to move to
the next level is solely based on his her language performance on the
bi-monthly exams or the exit assessment. This is reflected on the syllabi the
student receives.
6. Describe how the program or language institution
aggregates or accumulates evidence of how well students are achieving the
established student learning outcomes.
State how the program or language institution interprets this aggregate
data to show that the program is of good quality.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE aggregates and accumulates evidence of performance in relation to
student learning outcomes through our SchoolWorks student information
system. SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE
administration requires all assessments entered for each individual
student. Each assessment is tied
to specific student learning outcomes.
Thus, administration is able to see each student’s performance on
particular student learning outcomes.
Data is logged for individual skill areas as well, i.e. reading,
grammar, listening. Additionally, with the new digital learning environment,
MyEnglishLabs, detailed reports regarding student performance on individual
activities, as well as assessments are able to be collected and aggregated to
see student performance on individual SLOs, as well as offering a holistic
picture of learning gains.
Through
both these vehicles, Spanish-American Institute is able to ascertain the
overall quality of the language program being delivered. If students are not making gains in one
area, (or in one particular class) the institution can reevaluate what is
happening in that particular area/class. This self-review process allows SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE to constantly review, evaluate and implement change to ensure that
student learning outcomes are being met.
7. State the
program’s record retention policy on proficiency and grade reports. Indicate where proficiency and grade
reports are maintained.
The Institute retains proficiency and grade reports indefinitely
with the students permanent records.
The proficiency and grade reports are maintained with student permanent
record folders and on electronic media in the SchoolWorks Progress database on
site with off site backup.
B. Verification
Student Achievement Standard 3
2. Verification on site Student Grade Labels may be found affixed to student permanent
record cards |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
Through this self-study SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE recognizes the need
to publish our proficiency scale for students as well. This will be published via our School
Catalog, faculty handbook and attached to each student report. Spring 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student
Achievement Standard 4: The program or language institution informs students of
the assessment procedures used to determine placement, progression from level
to level, and completion of the program, as well as their individual results.
A. Required responses
1. Check to
indicate the written means by which students are informed of each assessment
practice.
|
Initial placement procedures |
Assessment procedures to monitor progress within courses or levels |
Assessment procedures to determine progress from level to level |
Assessment procedures to determine successful completion of the program |
Relationship of grades to promotion |
Impact of attendance, effort, and other indirect indicators on grades and promotion |
Appeal procedures for initial placement and grades/progress |
student handbook (printed) |
x |
x |
X |
x |
|
|
X |
student handbook (electronic) |
x |
x |
X |
x |
|
|
X |
orientation materials |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
student advising sessions with handouts |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
course syllabi |
|
x |
X |
x |
|
X |
|
faculty presentation with handouts |
x |
x |
X |
x |
|
X |
X |
progress or grade reports |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Summarize
the process by which students may appeal a) initial placement and b) course
grades or promotion decisions.
While
there is currently not a formal appeal process, there is a regular process that
is followed institutionally.
First, if students feel that are misplaced based on his/her initial
CELSA test, the student is re-assessed in the class the first week of
classes. This re-assessment takes
place in the natural learning environment, informally. If a teacher concurs that the student
may be misplaced, the student is referred to the Division Chair. The Division Chair meets with the
student to determine if a student should be moved up. Promotions from course to course are based on a
student’s overall performance with the course content of the course he or she
is enrolled. Performance is
measured through bi-monthly assessments and the exit assessment. If a student feels he or she is ready
to be promoted prior to the number of course hours, he or she may demonstrate
mastery of course content, i.e. SLOs through one of two means. First, successful completion exit
assessment. Secondly, successful
completion of all course content on MyEnglishLab. Successful completion is measured at 65%.
3. State the
relationship between course grades and promotion.
Currently,
grades are calculated by: 25% attendance and participation, 50% course work
(including informal and formative assessments), 25% bi-monthly
assessments. Students must earn a
65% average to move to the next level.
In addition to the passing score, students are required to complete the
total number of hours in the course, pass the exit assessment, or demonstrate
mastery of SLOs through successful completion of activities on
MyEnglishLab.
4. Describe
the process by which students are informed of their progress in courses and
their progress from level to level throughout the curriculum.
Students
are mailed a Grade Report Letter (Copy
of Grade Report Letter) every eight weeks. The Grade Report Letter details a student’s progress in a
course and through the ESL Plus Course of Study. It notes the hours in each level. If a student is ready to move on to the next level, a
teacher may initiate that progression.
It is noted in SchoolWorks and the student is made aware of his/her
changed status via The Grade Report Letter.
5. State the
program’s or language institution’s policy and procedures regarding monitoring
and counseling students on academic achievement, including failure to make
satisfactory progress.
The
Dean of Students supervises support staff who provide assistance regarding
academic progress. The Institute's Counseling Plan describes the
following specific guidance services:
•
Identification of "at risk" students through academic
progress and attendance tracking in conjunction with administrative review of
all bi-monthly and final grades.
•
One-on-one orientation and progress conferences.
•
Academic warning notification and referral for in-school support to
help with academic problems.
The
Institute has had an Early Warning system in place for many years through which
teachers notify the President or his designees about significant attendance or
academic problems. In 2001, the school developed a weekly tracking system
through which faculty indicate student's academic progress on the weekly
attendance reports. Should the
student not progress beyond that in a reasonable amount of time, the faculty
member spends additional time with the student to determine the nature of the
problem and, if need be, refers the student to the President or designees for
counseling.
B. Verification
Student Achievement Standard 4
1. Documentation in the report School Catalog policy
statements on:
|
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to establish a
formal appeals process for placement tests and grade and promotion. This process needs to be detailed in
both the School Catalog and the Faculty handbook. While the current process works, SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE
firmly believes all processes need to be transparent to students and
stakeholders. Summer 2012.
2.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to expand the
publications of our current assessment practices. Updates need to be made in the School Catalog, Faculty
Handbook, Orientation Materials and Grade Report Letters to reflect assessment
practices and policies regarding grades and promotion information. Spring 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Student
Complaints Standard 1: The program or language institution makes available to
students, in writing, procedures by which they may lodge complaints. The
program or language institution documents and maintains records of formal
student complaints, as well as the resolution of any such complaints.
A. Required responses
1. Indicate
where students may find, in writing, procedures to lodge complaints.
_x___ student handbook
_x___ website
_____ orientation materials
_x___ posted procedures
_____ syllabi or course policy sheets
_____ other (Complete 2 below.)
2. List other
sources not stated in 1 above.
none.
3. State the
program’s or language institution’s definition of “formal complaint.”
A
formal complaint is any unresolved concern. These can be at the instructional
level, or regarding an administrative policy.
4. Describe
the procedures that are followed by the program/institution to resolve formal
complaints, including how records of the complaint and its resolution are kept.
As
stated in the catalog students and all employees (including administrative staff) who have
concerns, dissatisfactions, or complaints are encouraged to bring them to the
Institute's attention as promptly as possible. Problems involving
classroom matters should first be discussed directly with the faculty member
involved. Questions about administrative policies or non-academic matters
should be discussed with a Faculty Student-Services Associate.
Concerns
unresolved (formal complaints) with a Faculty Student-Services Associate may be
discussed with the Dean of Students. Dissatisfactions unresolved with the
Dean of Students should be presented to the President.
Remaining
issues may be submitted in writing to the Board of Directors. The
submission should describe the problem in detail, include any available
documentation, and be signed by the student or employee. The Board will
make appropriate inquiries and recommend a resolution within thirty (30) days
of receiving the written concern and will notify the student or employee of
those findings.
At
no time shall a final determination be made by a person or persons directly
involved in the complaint itself. Students and employees are assured that
no adverse action will be taken against anyone expressing a concern through
this mechanism.
A
student or employee who is not satisfied with the Institute's complaint
resolution and who has reason to believe that the institution has acted contrary
to its published standards or that conditions at the institution appear to
jeopardize the quality of the instructional programs or the general welfare of
its students may file a written complaint with the New York State Education
Department. Any person who believes he or she has been aggrieved by the
institution on or after May 4, 1994, may file a written complaint with the
Department within two years of the alleged incident, as follows:
The
person should first try to resolve the complaint directly with the institution
by following the internal complaint procedures described above. Copies of
all documents and correspondence should be kept.
If
a person is unable to resolve the complaint with the institution or believes
that the institution has not properly addressed the concerns, he or she may
request a complaint form by telephoning the Postsecondary Complaint Registry or
writing to the New York Education Department, Postsecondary Complaint Registry,
116 West 32 Street, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10001, 212-643-4760 / Fax:
212-643-4765.
The
Postsecondary Complaint Registry Form should be completed, signed and sent to
the above address. The completed form should indicate the resolution being
sought and any efforts that have been made to resolve the complaint through the
institution's internal complaint processes. Copies of all relevant
documents should be included.
After
receiving the completed form, the Department will notify the complainant of its
receipt and make any necessary request for further information. When
appropriate, the Department will also advise the institution that a complaint
has been made and, when appropriate, the nature of the complaint. The
complainant will also be notified of the name of the evaluator assigned to
address the specific complaint. The evaluator may contact the complainant
for additional information.
The
Department will make every effort to address and resolve complaints within
ninety days from receipt of the complaint form.
Some
complaints may fall within the jurisdiction of an agency or organization other
than the State Education Department. These complaints will be referred to the
entity with appropriate jurisdiction. When a complaint concerns a matter that
falls solely within the jurisdiction of the institution, the complainant will
be notified and the Department will refer the complaint to the institution in
question and request that the matter receive a review and response.
Upon
conclusion of the Department's complaint review or upon the disposition of the
complaint by referral to another agency or organization, or to the institution,
the Department will issue a written notice to the complainant describing the
resolution of the complaint. The complainant may contact the Department
evaluator directly for follow-up information or for additional assistance.
In
addition, students and employees may contact the Institute’s accrediting body,
the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools, 750 First Street,
NE, Suite 980, Washington, DC 20002-4242, Telephone: 202-336-6780, Fax:
202-842-2593.
All
formal complaint records are kept in both the President’s office and via SPANISH-AMERICAN
Institute's SchoolWorks database.
B. Verification
1. Documentation in the report School Catalog
Policy and Procedure statement on Complaints Faculty Handbook
Policy and Procedure statement on Complaints |
2. Verification on site The School Catalog may be view on site in the offices of the Faculty
Student-Services Associates. |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1.
Describe the follow up activities, with timelines,
that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language institution’s
practices under this standard.
If no action is planned, indicate “none.”
None.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Program
Development, Planning, and Review 1: The program or language institution has a
plan, in writing, for development of the program or language institution,
including planning, implementation, and evaluation.
A. Required responses
1. Does
the program/institution have a written plan for development that indicates
tasks, processes, responsible parties, timelines, and the documentation that
provides evidence of implementation?
_x__ yes
_____ no
2. Check each
area for which the plan specifies steps for review and/or planning.
_x___ mission
and goals
_x___
financial resources
_____ human
resources
_____
physical plant
_x___ internal
and external factors that affect student enrollment, curriculum development,
student achievement, faculty and staff
_x___
administrative procedures
_x___
operational policies
_____ other
(Complete 3 below.)
3. List other
areas of the plan not listed in 2 above.
none.
4. Where is
the written plan kept and who has access to it?
The
Instructional Effectiveness Plan is written in-house every five years by a team
of SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE employees.
It is accessible to all internal and external stakeholders via SPANISH-AMERICAN
Institute's website. The study
group team members for the 2009-2014 cycle included:
Dante V. Ferraro, President
Paul Schiffman, Dean of Student Services
Tom Schwenke, Dean of Administrative Services
Carolyn Prager, Dean of Academic Affairs and IEP Study Group (IEPSG) Chair
Freddie Ann Bush, Career Program Business Chair and IEL Business Chair
Enrique Nibeyro, Career Program Computer Chair
Bouchra Zouhairi, IEL Computer Chair
Libertad Grajo, Career Program English Chair
Nori Panganiban, IEL English Chair
5. Describe
the last planning and development cycle, including actions that have been
undertaken as a result of the process.
The
2009-2014 Instructional Effectiveness Plan highlighted the following:
Countries
of Origin: More than 90% of the student population are
international students from countries that include but are not limited
to: Turkey, Japan, Columbia, Niger, Guinea, Russia, Poland, Georgia, the
Stans, Ecuador, the Dominican Republic, Ukraine, Morocco, Brazil, Mexico, and
Senegal. Their median age is about 27.
Postsecondary
Education and Interests: The Institute’s student population has become
increasingly better educated and more globally diverse. Most
students have already attended a college or university in their home
countries. Over 75 % of students plan to pursue higher education and/or
an American degree after leaving the Institute..
Implications
for Planning: The Spanish-American Institute has been in transition since its
founding--from a “Spanish-American” student population to a more international
population; from a school providing minimal entry-level skills clerical
training to one providing more sophisticated office skills training; and from a
school that provided basic communicative ESL instruction to one also providing
more comprehensive and sophisticated English-as-a Second Language
instruction.
Accreditation
Self-Study Processes and IEP Development : In 2011, the
Institute will undertake two accreditation processes. The first is for
ACICS renewal accreditation. The second is for a new accreditation from
the Commission on English Language Program Accreditation (CEA). Each will occur
in overlapping timeframes. The Institute anticipates that the new CEA
process will bring more depth to the ACICS Self-Study review and
vice-versa. Accreditation Standards Self-Study Committees were appointed
to review the following areas:
·
Mission,
Recruiting, and Student Complaints,
·
Curriculum
·
Resources
·
Faculty
·
Student
Services
Student
Achievement.
Several
actions have been taken as a result of the Instructional Effectiveness Plan in
the aforementioned areas.
In
the area of Mission:
·
Workshops given in accreditation for both ACICS and CEA.
In
the area of Curriculum:
·
All syllabi have been reviewed and updated to reflect new student
learning outcomes.
·
New English Literacy course developed and implemented.
·
Information Literacy resources added to school library to support
learning activities and current best practices.
·
New digital tool, MyEnglishLabs, added to increase learner gains.
In
the area of Faculty:
·
Intensive English (IEL) Division Chairs appointed to support faculty
and full implement new curriculum standards.
·
Workshops given in using ESL Course materials and Good Testing
Standards and Practice.
·
Workshop given in using a digital tool effectively to generate student
data reports, i.e. measure learning.
In
the area of Resources:
·
Information Literacy resources added to school library.
·
New DVDs and audios added to library to support instruction.
·
IMac computers with 27” screens acquired for classroom instruction.
·
New server acquired to support record keeping.
·
Apple Airport Extreme wireless hubs installed to support 250
simultaneous wireless connections.
·
3 flat screen HD-DVD all in ones purchased for ESL courses.
·
90 Macs added to computer room and library.
In
the area of Student Services:
·
New ESL placement tool used to better determine ESL Placement level
(CELSA).
In
the area of Student Achievement:
·
New online formal test duplication form request to facilitate test
monitoring and to create data-base validation that testing measures new student
learning outcomes.
·
Implementation of mylabs to generate student learning reports.
·
Addition of criteria entered into SchoolWorks database to identify
student achievement in courses.
6. Describe
how actions taken as a result of planned review and development are evaluated,
and by whom.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
Institute's Institutional Effectiveness Plan has a clear review and evaluation
cycle. The implementation of new
initiatives are evaluated by SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE Administration and
various stakeholders. The following
chart outlines the reviewers and the evaluation tools.
Action |
Reviewer |
Evaluation |
All
syllabi have been reviewed and updated to reflect new student learning
outcomes. |
Dean
of Academic Affairs, English Chair, ESL Faculty |
1.
Reviewed and discussed at Faculty meetings. 2.
Faculty survey regarding new syllabi and their
effectiveness/appropriateness. |
New
English Literacy course developed and implemented |
Dean
of Academic Affairs, English Chair and ESL Faculty. |
1.
New English Literacy course developed and approved internally. 2.
Approved by State Department of Education in 2009. 3.
Four sections offered and enrolled in Fall 2010. |
Information
Literacy resources added to school library to support learning activities and
current best practices. |
Dean
of Academic Affairs, President |
1.
Memo sent to Faculty for requests. 2.
Requests made at Faculty meetings. 3.
Purchased items. 4.
Track student usage of new items through Library sign-in sheets
and print check-out (circulation records). |
New
digital tool, My English Labs, added to increase learner gains. |
Dean
of Academic Affairs, ESL Faculty. |
1.
Student time on lessons. 2.
Student achievement in courses. 3.
Track student time to progress to a level, find mean, compare to
previous classes without digital tool’s mean. |
Intensive
English (IEL) Division Chairs appointed to support faculty and full implement
new curriculum standards. |
President,
Dean of Academic Affairs. |
1.
Evaluation of IEL Division Chairs by Dean of Academic Affairs. |
Workshops
given in using ESL Course materials and Good Testing Standards and Practice. |
Dean
of Academic Affairs |
1. Faculty Survey of workshop. 80% or higher rate as helpful or very
helpful. |
Workshop
given in using a digital tool effectively to generate student data reports, i.e.
measure learning. |
Outside
consultant, Pearson Longman ELT |
1.
Faculty rate workshop as helpful or very helpful. 2.
Faculty able to generate student learning reports. |
Information
Literacy resources added to school library. |
Dean
of Academic Affairs, President. |
Memos
to faculty about information literacy course objectives in textbooks and
syllabi. Faculty meeting agenda items (e.g., 7/11/09). Institute Instructional Resources Manual
contains sections on the Institute Library, public library access, and
information literacy skills development. Institute bulletin boards
contain posting about applying for library cards and libraries nearest the
Institute, 10/09--. |
New
ESL placement tool used to better determine ESL Placement level (CELSA). |
Dean
of Academic Affairs |
Review
placement scores and student success/failure in placed course. |
Addition
of criteria entered into SchoolWorks database to identify student achievement
in courses |
President |
1.
Keep track of all standardized bi-monthly exam scores by skill area
for each student. 2.
Track success of students by skill area. |
B. Verification
Program Development, Planning and Review Standard 1
1. Documentation in the report Institutional Effectiveness Plan |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1.
Describe the follow up activities, with timelines,
that will be undertaken to improve the program’s or language institution’s
practices under this standard.
If no action is planned, indicate “none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE has a strong process in
place to review program components.
However, reporting processes need to be strengthened. SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to
develop a system in which all faculty report more than bi-monthly on student
achievement.
2.
A standardized exit exam needs to be generated for
all levels that specifically targets the student learning outcomes of the
course. While this is currently
being worked on for Level Four, all levels needs to move in this direction.
3.
The Faculty need to work towards developing a
rubric for oral assessments by each level.
4.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE is looking towards
creating a system in which student movement within the program can be documented
and a mean determined.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
Program
Development, Planning, and Review 2:
The program or language institution regularly reviews and revises its
program components and has a plan, in writing, to guide the review of
curricular elements, student assessment practices, and student services
policies and activities. The plan is systematically implemented.
A. Required responses
1. Does the
program/institution have a written plan to guide the review and revision of
curriculum, and does the plan state the tasks, process, responsible parties,
timelines, and documentation that will provide evidence of implementation?
__x__ yes
_____ no
2. When
evaluating curriculum, indicate all items that are reviewed, as stated in the
written plan.
_x__ goals and objectives and syllabi for each course
_x___ teaching materials
_x___ teaching methods and methodologies
_x___ student learning outcomes
_x___ other (Complete 3 below.)
3. List other
items not included in 2 above.
Criteria
for grade distribution, i.e. % of homework, attendance, assessments.
4. When
evaluating curriculum, indicate sources of input to the review, as stated in
the written plan.
_x___ feedback from faculty
_x___ feedback from students
_x___ needs assessment of the student population sought or
enrolled by the program/institution
_x___ research in the areas of language teaching and
learning
_x___ student achievement data
_____ other (Complete 5 below.)
5. List other
sources not included in 4 above.
none.
6. Where is
the written plan for review of curriculum kept and who has access to it?
The
Institutional Effectiveness Plan (IEP) not only internally reviews the
institution, but reviews all policies and practices at Spanish-American
Institute. A large component of
the IEP is curriculum. This is
posted on our website for all constituents’ to view. Additionally, hardcopies are available throughout the
institution for faculty, staff and administration.
7. During the
last cycle of curriculum review and revision, what decisions were made and what
follow-up actions were taken?
In
2009 (the first year of the five-year plan which is updated annually) when the
last five-year IEP was started, it was noted where major changes to curriculum
needed to be made. First, a new
placement test was needed to better assess the student learning outcomes that were
being taught in the courses.
Additionally, courses were rewritten to better align course goals,
objectives and student learning outcomes.
Lastly, new instructional tools, in the digital format were evaluated
and selected to best correlate with our course SLOs.
8. Does the
program/institution have a written plan to guide the review and revision of
student achievement practices?
__x__ yes
_____ no
9. When evaluating student assessment practices, indicate
all items that are reviewed, as stated in the written plan.
__x__ placement procedures and instruments
__x__ faculty-made tests and assessments
__x__ rubrics and other evaluation tools
__x__ end-of-term assessments
__x__ reporting practices
__x__ methods of documenting student achievement
__x__ reliability and validity of testing instruments
_____ other (Complete 10 below.)
10. List
other items not included in 9 above.
none.
11. When evaluating student assessment practices, indicate
sources of input to the review, as stated in the written plan.
__x__ data on change of initial placement
__x__ data on pass/fail rates
__x__ data on achievement of student learning outcomes
__x__ data on patterns of progression from level to level
__x__ data on program completion
__x__ research on assessment and achievement in language
learning
__x__ feedback from faculty
__x___ feedback from students
__x__ feedback from sponsors, employers,
colleges/universities
_____ other (Complete 12 below.)
12. List
other sources not included in 11 above.
none.
13. Where is
the written plan for review of student achievement kept and who has access to
it?
Review
of SPANISH-AMERICAN Institute's assessment practices is also contained in the
Institutional Effectiveness Plan.
It is available to all on SPANISH-AMERICAN Institute's website. Additionally, hardcopies are available
for all faculty, staff and administration.
14. During
the last cycle of review and revision of student assessment practices, what
decisions were made and what follow-up actions were taken?
Three
major changes occurred since our last review. First, a new placement tool was selected. Again, it was selected due to the lack
of correlation with the last assessment tool and our course goals. Secondly, bi-monthly assessments became
standardized. That is that all
teachers, in one level, are utilizing the same assessment tool to measure
student achievement. Lastly, exit
assessments are also currently being put in place. While bi-monthly assessments are necessary process in
measuring student achievement, they were not measuring all student learning
outcomes. By developing and
delivering an exit assessment that measures all student learning outcomes for a
particular course, Spanish-American Institute ensures that all learning
outcomes are evaluated.
15. Does the
program/institution have a written plan to guide the review and revision of
student services?
__x__ yes
_____ no
16. When
evaluating student services practices, indicate all items that are reviewed, as
stated in the written plan.
__x__ admissions policies
_____ promotional materials
__x__ orientation materials and activities
__x__ social and recreational activities
__x__ personal, academic, and immigration advising
services
_____ housing services
_____ health insurance offerings or counseling
__x__ outside service providers
_____ other (Complete 17 below.)
17. List
other items not included in 16 above.
none.
18. When
evaluating student services practices, indicate sources of input to the review,
as stated in the written plan.
_x___ feedback from students
_x___ feedback from program/institution personnel
_x___ feedback from outside service providers
_x___ research on good practices in student services
_X___ other (Complete 19 below.)
19. List
other sources not included in 18 above.
The institute's Advisory Board listed in the
School Catalog.
20. Where is
the written plan for review of student services kept and who has access to it?
SPANISH-AMERICAN
Institute's Institutional Effectiveness Plan measures student support services
as well. It is accessible on our
website and hard copies are available to all faculty, staff and administration.
21. During
the last cycle of review and revision of student services practices, what decisions
were made and what follow-up actions were taken?
A
Retention Improvement Plan was established to track student movement within the
ESL Plus Course of Study. If
students were not successful in moving forward, guidance services were offered.
B. Verification
Program Planning, Development and Review Standard 2
1. Documentation in the report Institutional Effectiveness Plan Advisory
Board listed in the School Catalog |
2. Verification on site |
C. Program/language institution
self-recommendations
1. Describe
the follow up activities, with timelines, that will be undertaken to improve
the program’s or language institution’s practices under this standard. If no action is planned, indicate
“none.”
1.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to establish a cycle of curriculum
review on a yearly basis. Spring
2012.
2.
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to collect data monthly on student
progress. Spring 2012.
SECTIONS
BELOW RESERVED. NOT PART OF THE
SELF-STUDY.
For site review team use only Appears to meet _____ Appears
to partially meet _____ Does
not appear to meet _____ Review team comments: |
A.
Strength
The Spanish
American Institute is a not for profit language school that has been delivering
quality English Language Instruction to international students at a single
location in Times Square since 1955.
While English language teaching, and education as a whole, has changed
greatly over this time, the mission of the SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE has
remained remarkably consistent—to serve the needs of the English Language
Learners in the New York City area.
The founders, Frank J. Ferraro and David Schiffman, established
traditions, practices and perspectives on students which are carried out today
by their sons, Dante V. Ferraro, President and Paul Schiffman, Dean of Student
Services. Students have always
been at the heart of our institution and remain so today. Thus, our greatest strength has been
our ability to carry out our mission.
Secondly,
we have continued to offer quality instruction. Our teachers are qualified and remain exceptionally dedicated
to our students and their success in and out of the classroom. The teaching faculty at Spanish-American
Institute continues to work towards developing themselves further in the ESL
Profession. This is evidenced by
the Professional Development Plans they have created and executed.
SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE is student-centered, and our goal is for our students to master the
language. Our ability to make
changes and implement those changes have been critical to the success of the
learner. We have recently modified
all courses to reflect the student learning outcomes that we have been teaching
in the classroom. Those
modifications resulted in changes in the course goals and course
objectives. SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE has been and remains flexible to these changes.
B.
Areas for improvement
While
certain assessment practices are not new to SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE,
aggregating and analyzing student achievement data is relatively new. Thus, our greatest area of improvement
needs to be in the collecting of data more regularly to initiate change.
Additionally,
SPANISH-AMERICAN INSTITUTE needs to remain as transparent as it has always
been. Policies and procedures need
to be posted and continuously reviewed for accuracy and effectiveness.
Changes made during the self study
As a result of the Self-Study
several changes have already been made.
All syllabi have been updated.
These updates reflect the best practices in the field. Syllabi now have course goals,
objectives and observable and measurable student learning outcomes. Additionally, policies regarding
passing and movement to the next level are also included on student
syllabi.
Exit assessments are another area
that have been modified under the Self-Study review process. When SPANISH-AMERICAN
INSTITUTE began the process, it was realized that evidence of mastery of
student learning outcomes is necessary.
Thus, we evaluated best practices in the field and found that we needed
to establish a process for exit assessments and a format that is workable for
students, faculty and administration.
An implementation plan for MyEnglishLabs was developed.
DESCRIPTORS- ESTABLISHED And
published
A.
Documents
included in the self study report
|
B.
Documents available
on site
Copies of
School Catalog with Mission Statement
Copies of
Faculty Handbook with Mission Statement
Copies of
the Institutional Effectiveness Plan with Mission Statement
Copies of
the ESL-Plus Course of Study Syllabi with Mission Statement
Current
Student Survey with Faculty Memo
Graduate
Student Placement Questionnaires
Copies of
the School Catalog available in the Admissions Offices
Books and
Materials for available in the school bookstore
Copies of
the Faculty Handbook in Resource Center, Special Events Center and Student
Lounge
Copies of
the Faculty Handbook available is faculty and staff desks and lockers
Faculty
Personnel files located in the President's Office
Faculty
personnel files available in the President's office
Facilities, Equipment and Supplies Standard 1
School
Catalogs may be found on site in the offices of the Faculty Student-Services
Associates.
Administrative and fiscal Capacity Standard 1
The
Organization Chart may be verified in the Site Visit Team's Review Room.
The ACICS
Certificate of Accreditation may be view in the Institute's Reception Area.
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 2
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 3
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 4
Table of
Administrative and Support Staff may be viewed in the President's Office.
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 5
Completed
Evaluation Forms are available in personnel files located in the President's
Office.
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 6
School
Catalogs may be verified in the offices of the Faculty Student-Services
Associates
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 7
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 8
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 9
Student
paper records may be found in the Institute admissions and student services
offices.
Personnel
records may be found in the President's Office.
Administrative and Fiscal Capacity Standard 10
The School
Catalog may be found on site in the Faculty Student-Services Associates'
Offices.
School
Catalogs may be found in the offices of the Faculty Student Services Associates
School
Catalogs are available for inspection in the Faculty Student-Services
Associates offices.
Length and Structure of Program of Instruction Standard 1
School
Catalogs with Calendar are available to the visit team in Institute offices
Length and Structure of Program of Instruction Standard 2
Student Achievement Standard 1
School
Catalogs are available in the Faculty Student Services Associates offices.
CELSA
Placement Test information Sheets are available in Permanent Student Record
Folders
"How
Long" Study data is available in the President's Office.
Student Achievement Standard 2
Student Achievement Standard 3
Student
Grade Labels may be found affixed to student permanent record cards
Student Achievement Standard 4
The School
Catalog may be view on site in the offices of the Faculty Student-Services
Associates.
Program Development, Planning and Review Standard 1
Program Planning, Development and Review Standard 2