Criterion Referenced Measureable Objectives for English Language Testing

Bi-Monthly Exam Model

ESL 4, Unit 1

Draft, For Discussion Only

20111019

 

WorldView and NorthStar Scope and Sequence Correlations: 1

WorldView and NorthStar Scope and Sequence Learning Outcomes Objectives: 2

WorldView and NorthStar Scope and Sequence Basis for Testing and Assessment: 2

Assessing Listening and Speaking Using Publisher’s Tests. 2

Teacher Bi-Monthly Exam Model and Guidelines. 2

 

 

At the September, 2011 faculty meeting, we reviewed and discussed the correlation between various learning taxonomies and the ESL profession’s criteria for determining and assessing measureable objectives for different ESL levels.  The following description of ESL 4 correlations is excerpted for ESL 4 from the faculty meeting handout.  Please ask Dr. Prager if you need a copy of the handout. 

 

ESL 4/Intermediate Level Correlations

Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives

TOEFL iBT Independent Writing Rubrics (6 levels)

NorthStar- TOEFL Correlations*

( after course completion)

(paper test /iBT**)

TESOL sets standards for 5 levels

K-12 students

 

TESOL does not set explicit Postsecondary standards which

Analysis:  able to use language to break down information  into component parts, to understand its organizational structure, to develop divergent conclusions, to make inferences, and/or find information to support generalizations.  Analyzes, categorizes, compares, contrasts, correlates, differentiates, illustrates, infers, etc. 

3=somewhat developed explanations and/or details; displays unity, progressions, and coherence though connections of ideas may be sometimes obscured; inconsistent sentence formation and word choice that results in lack of clarity and obscures meaning; accurate BUT limited range of syntactic structures and vocabulary. 

Intermediate:  360-440/

22-42

 

(scores too low for  most college admissions, including CUNY community colleges)

TESOL Level 3-Developing:  Students understand more complex speech but still may require some repetition. They use English spontaneously but may have difficulty expressing all their thoughts due to a restricted vocabulary and a limited command of language structure. Students at this level speak in simple sentences, which are comprehensible and appropriate, but which are frequently marked by grammatical errors. Proficiency in reading may vary considerably. Students are most successful constructing meaning from texts for which they have background knowledge upon which to build.

TESOL Level 4-Expanding:  Students’ language skills are adequate for most day-to-day communication needs. They communicate in English in new or unfamiliar settings but have occasional difficulty with complex structures and abstract academic concepts.L4 students may read with considerable fluency and are able to locate and identify the specific facts within the text. However, they may not understand texts in which the concepts are presented in a decontextualized manner, the sentence structure is complex, or the vocabulary is abstract or has multiple meanings

 

 

WorldView and NorthStar Scope and Sequence Correlations:

  WorldView and NorthStar’s Scope and Sequence define the English language learning objectives for each textbook unit.  The Scope and Sequence parallels the criterion referenced outcomes criteria in the table above: 

·         in Bloom’s taxonomy,

·         on the TOEFL iBT, in NorthStar-TOEFL correlations, and

·         in TESOL standards for ESL learning. 

 

WorldView and NorthStar Scope and Sequence Learning Outcomes Objectives:

  The Institute’s ESL 4 uses NorthStar’s Intermediate level texts.  ESL 4 students are at Bloom’s  “analysis” and TESOL’s “expanding” levels of language learning.  While they use language for mainly concrete situations, they now also use English for more abstract and academic discussions.  Because of this transition from lower to higher critical thinking and higher order language skills, ESL 4 or Intermediate is the most important in the ESL spectrum.  Students who skip this level will progress with difficulty if at all at the High Intermediate or Advanced levels. 

 

For example, while lower ESL levels use language to describe, define, collect,inform, instruct, relate, etc something concrete, the ESL 4 Intermediate level asks students to use language to also analyze, categorize, compare, contrast, correlate, infer, etc.  ESL 4/Intermediate levels students are expected to use language to break down information into its component parts, to understand its organizational structure, to develop divergent conclusions, to find support information, etc.  In other words, the Intermediate ESL level asks students to use language at a higher level of critical thinking which, in turn, demands a higher level of language skills.  This is reflected in the NorthStar Intermediate’s  emphases upon comparing and contrasting, inferring, supporting opinions, evaluating, predicting, hypothesizing, etc.  These are the language skills objectives for the course!   

 

WorldView and NorthStar Scope and Sequence Basis for Testing and Assessment:

  For these reasons, WorldView and NorthStar’s Scope and Sequence provide the Institute’s objective criterion referenced basis for Bi-monthly exams and course exit placement.  The Institute expects teachers to develop Bi-monthly exams based on the Scope and Sequence for each unit.  . 

 

Scope and Sequence

NorthStar Intermediate, Unit 1

“Advertising on the Air”

Assessment Objectives

Reading, Writing, and Short Answers That Assess These Skills

Critical Thinking Skills:

·          to critique,

·          to identify salient features,

·          to propose something based on information,

·          to infer word meaning from context,

·          to compare and contrast,

·          to correlate examples with abstract principles

Critical Thinking Skills:

·          to critique,

·          to identify salient features,

·          to propose something based on information,

·          to infer word meaning from context,

·          to compare and contrast,

·          to correlate examples with abstract principles

Vocabulary

·          context clues

·          synonyms

·          definitions

Vocabulary

·          context clues

·          synonyms

·          definitions

Grammar

·          imperatives

Grammar

·          imperatives

 

Assessing Listening and Speaking Using Publisher’s Tests

 

Teachers should not use the publisher’s ESL tests for Bi-monthly exams.  However, they should use publisher’s tests to intermittently assess students’ skills during the normal conduct of the course.  For example, teachers should use shorter or longer selections from Listening tests as quizzes, to help students’ self-assess, and to otherwise help in teaching course material.  Please record grades from publishers’ tests since these scores will provide evidence of student listening and other language skills achievement for exit assessment before students can continue to the next ESL level.    

 

Teacher Bi-Monthly Exam Model and Guidelines

 

An outside reviewer should be able to pick up a Bi-Monthly exam and identify it as a test that correlates to a specific WorldView or NorthStar unit.  The following is a model for Bi-Monthly exams correlated to the textbook’s Scope and Sequence.  While specific to NorthStar Intermediate’s (ESL 4) unit 1, it provides a model for other ESL testing. 

 

Note that the model below progressively measures skills from easier and less independent to more difficult and more independent. 

 

It is only a model.  Teachers may also adapt other testing strategies such as dictations so long as they follow the following guidelines: 

 

1.                   Grammar (optional) short-answer questions account for no more than 10% of the exam and correlate directly to the unit’s grammar focus.

2.                   Vocabulary (optional) short-answer questions account for no more than 20% of the exam and correlate directly to the unit’s vocabulary focus. 

3.                   Vocabulary questions, if used, must correlate to ESL 4/Intermediate level expectation.  Therefore, they must test comprehension based on inferred meaning. 

4.                   Integrated reading and writing must be included.  It must correlate to unit material followed by integrated writing questions correlated to the unit’s theme and critical thinking objectives in the Scope and Sequence.

5.                   At least one guided writing question(s) must be included.  It must correlate to the unit’s theme and critical thinking objectives in the Scope and Sequence. 

6.                  At least one independent writing question must be included,  preferably one based on a reading passage that correlates to the unit’s theme and critical thinking objectives in the Scope and Sequence.