Spanish-American Institute

Institutional Effectiveness Plan Program Development Addendum

Fall 2012

Program Development, Planning and Review
Standard 1: The program or language institution has a plan, in writing, for development of the program or language institution, including planning, implementation, and evaluation.

Rationale for appears to partially meet:

SAI has a 5-year Institutional Effectiveness Plan as required by the ACICS accrediting agency. As an Institutional Effectiveness Plan, it is well written and complete and calls for periodic review of program components. While the Institutional Effectiveness Plan will be reviewed every five years, definite time frames for planning for program development are not included. Generally, only the dates of the last completed review are given. For example, the Institutional Effectiveness Plan states, “Assess future infrastructure needs and plan for improvement.” However, there is no date indicating when the review took place and when it will happen again.

In addition, the discussion for this standard  states, “the written plan must include the tasks, process, responsible parties, and time lines, as well as a list of the documentation that provides evidence that the plan has been implemented.” Although Say’s Institutional Effectiveness Plan includes tasks for evaluating the human, financial, and physical resources needed to reach its goals, it does not describe how those tasks will be accomplished.

Comment: Spanish-American Institute’s five year Institutional Effectiveness Plan has been revised to include “tasks, process, responsible parties, and time lines, as well as a list of the documentation that provides evidence that the plan has been implemented.” We have added more specific time frames and more detail on the process. This format will be used as part of the next five year IEP.

Refer to the updated IEP in the Addendum.

 


 

1          To develop a state-of-the English curriculum that integrates the four language skills with emphasis on active listening

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

1.1

Keep ESL teaching materials current

Dean and English Chair reviewed NorthStar 3rd ed. with the NorthStar representatives

Decision made to continue with 2nd ed. as long as possible. Faculty orientation to new edition

ARW 3rd ed. phase-in 1/2010 and ESL 2 phase-in in 10/2010

President, Dean of Academic Affairs and English Chairs

Summer 2009

Faculty Meeting
     December 2009

Completed December 2011

Meeting Minute
Faculty Meeting & Workshop Minutes

December 2013

1.2

Review and update ESL syllabi

Task performed every two years by Student Achievement Standards Committee

Dean of Academic Affairs

Review began Summer 2011
Completed Fall 2011
ESL Syllabi
ESL Syllabi

Fall 2013

1.3

Obtain renewal of approval for current ESL courses and programs from NYS State Department of Education (SED).

President and DAA complete SED application for renewal

President and Dean of Academic Affairs

Received SED renewal in 2010

 

1.4

Consider new English courses or course revisions

Part of Faculty Meeting agenda

Dean of Academic Affairs DAA, English Chair and faculty

Meeting Minute
Faculty Meeting & Workshop Minutes

 

1.5

Add English Literacy course option to the curriculum for pre-literate students in response to need

Recommendation from ESL 1 teachers
Designed, developed and piloted in sections for day and evening students

President, Dean of Academic Affairs DAA, English Chair and ESL faculty

Submitted for approval
?????
Approved 2009

 

1.6

Add a Pre-GED course to accommodate students not ready for regular GED instruction

New 605 “Pre-GED Foundation for GED Preparation prepared and presented to SED

President and Dean of Academic Affairs

Proposed in Fall 2010
Submitted for approval
Approved by SED in Spring of 2011 Implemented in Fall of 2011

 

1.7

To assure the integration of the four language skills and their measurement in English courses through standards based measureable objectives and criterion referenced testing in all courses

IEL Chairs appointed. Current syllabi and course test reviews begun for

·      standards- based measureable objectives keyed to acquisition of English language outcomes and

·      criterion referenced testing of standards-based  English language skills

Dean of Academic Affairs, Intensive English Language (IEL)  Division Chairs, English faculty

August 2011

 

1.8

Apply for Commission on English Language Program Accreditation (CEA).

CEA application approved.
Self-study Plan approved.
Self-study Standards Committee appointed

All personnel

July 2011
August 2011
Winter 2011

 

 

2          To develop career program courses with up-to-date curriculum and materials appropriate to content learning
in an ESL environment

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

2.1

 

Update keyboarding and computer application course textbooks, and software, as needed.  Review and update syllabi as needed.

Determine career courses using the most recent editions of course textbooks.

Purchase 30 site licenses for QuickBooks, installed on nine iMacs in the Accounting Room

Purchase and install Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing software

Dean of Academic Affairs and Career Program faculty

Spring 2009 (Review texts)

August 2009 (QuickBooks)

September 2009
     (Mavis Beacon)

All reviewed in 2011

September 2011

2.2

Obtain State Department of Education (SED) career program and course renewal in 2010.

Determined by SED renewal notification

960 Access & 965 PowerPoint

President and Dean of Academic Affairs

Submitted for review
and approved
December 2009

 

2.3

To introduce new courses in response to changing technology, workplace needs, and/or student interest

Prepared and submitted application for approval on three MAC courses
      Switching to the MAC
      Introduction to the MAC
      iMAC Movie

President, Dean of Academic Affairs and faculty

Submitted to SED and approved Winter 2011

Upon SED notification

2.4

To assure the integration of the four language skills and their measurement in non-ESL courses

Review current syllabi and course tests for

·         measurable objectives keyed to acquisition of English language outcome and

·         criterion referenced testing of English language skills

Dean of Academic Affairs, IEL (Intensive English Language) Chair and non-ESL faculty

Begin date, August 2011

End date, November 2011

August 2013

 

3.1       To develop library and information literacy resources and their use

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

3.1.a

 

Expand the Institute Library collection

Request recommendations from faculty
New titles entered into automated catalog and call number and title listing

Dean of Academic Affairs

 

 

3.1.b

Disseminate information about  Institute Library updates to faculty and staff

Faculty Meetings
Memos regarding new acquisitions

Dean of Academic Affairs

 

 

3.1.c

Track student usage of Library  through Library sign-in sheets and print check-out (circulation records).  Use data to determine if more faculty development needed on library integration

Library sign-in log and automated book checkout track individual student use of library resources

Dean of Academic Affairs

 

 

3.1.d

Review and revise Library homepage, as needed

Suggestions from DAA,
faculty, staff

President

No new requests

 

3.1.e

Develop bibliography correlated to NS 2nd and 3rd ed.

Intermediate and above texts and thematic material and add to the Library collection

35 books added to collection

Dean of Academic Affairs and ESL faculty

Correlated bibliography created Fall 2009

December 2010 &
January 2011

 

3.1.f

Provide computers for student use in Library

Nine iMacs installed in Library replacing five older PCs

President

Installed October 2010

Software updated every quarter

3.2       To develop library and information literacy skills in curriculum

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

3.2.a

 

Encourage faculty integration of library research and information literacy in curriculum correlated to textbook activities

Memos to faculty about information literacy course objectives in textbooks and syllabi

Institute Instructional Resources Manual contains sections on the Institute Library, public library access, and information literacy skills development

Institute bulletin boards contain posting about applying for library cards and libraries nearest the Institute

Dean of Academic Affairs and faculty

Faculty meeting agenda
July 11, 2009

Meeting Minute
Faculty Meeting & Workshop Minutes

Manual and bulletin board prepared October 2009

Instructional Resource Manual
Instructional Resource Manual

Brought to attention of new faculty and students as part of orientation process

Bulletin boards updated when new information on public library becomes available

3.2.b

Institute the NorthStar Bibliography with print material related to NorthStar unit themes and topic

With faculty input, expanded the Spanish-American Institute Library collection with print material including but not limited to gender concepts and roles, parenting, poverty amelioration, emotional intelligence, and the environment

NorthStar Bibliography project resulted in addition of c. 40 books on themes related to questions of role of biology or culture in forming gender concepts and roles

Dean of Academic Affairs and faculty

Winter 2010

 

3.3       To affirm and assure adherence to Institute’s copyright policies and practices

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

3.3

 

Review, revise (if needed), distribute, and monitor  Institute’s “Fair Use” Guidelines for Duplication of Copyrighted Material

Institute copyright policy and practice reaffirmed in

·         faculty/staff meetings,

·         memos, and

·         Instructional Resource Manual

President and Dean of Academic Affairs

Instructional Resource Manual
Instructional Resource Manual

 

4          To print and media course support that encourages active student-centered learning and assessment

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

4.1

Keep audio and visual instructional support material current and easily accessible to faculty

Growth in instructional support material holdings evident from:

q Institute Library automated catalog and

q “ESL Video and Audio Tape

Titles and Call Numbers” and “Teacher’s Manuals and Call Numbers” sections of  Instructional Resources Manual

Dean of Academic Affairs

Instructional Resource Manual
Instructional Resource Manual

 

4.2

Provide faculty with access to textbook teacher’s manuals, teaching guides, and A-V material  (where available)

Faculty may checkout companion textbook, A-V material, and teacher’s manuals as well as teacher’s guides  through the Bookstore.  Memos inform them of updates and additions

Dean of Academic Affairs

Available Winter 2011

Updated as new materials are purchased

4.3

Provide faculty and staff access to updated Instructional Resource Manuals

Instructional Resource Manual revised and divided into two sections in late 2009:  Primary Materials and Miscellaneous Materials (older collection).  Primary Materials updated frequently and contains expanded sections on public library access and on Institute Library collection correlated to NorthStar textbook units

Dean of Academic Affairs

Available Winter 2011

Updated as new materials are purchased

4.4

Provide information about and access to MyNorthStar Lab, the on-line instructional support site for NorthStar 3rd ed. with 3rd ed. phase-in in 2010

Dean of Academic Affairs reviewed NS 3e MyNorthStar Lab

Access obtained for ESL faculty; however, faculty consensus that MyNorthStarLab of limited utility compared to still available older NS online support

Dean of Academic Affairs and ESL faculty

Spring/Summer 2010

Reviewed again Winter 2011

Ongoing implementation of registering students as they enroll each month

4.5

Develop faculty capacity to use on-line instructional materials in the classroom, especially ESL material correlated to textbooks

Purchased 2 iMAC computers with 27” screens for classroom use with online, flash drive, DVD, and CD playback capacity.

Faculty meeting report from faculty using online material in classroom. Faculty workshop included NorthStar online support material

President, Dean of Academic Affairs, faculty

Installed June 2010

Faculty Meeting
     workshop May 2010

Meeting Minutes
Faculty Meeting & Workshop Minutes

 

5          To provide and improve computer infrastructure and hardware, software and instructional support software

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

5.1

Inventory computer and other hardware, periodically

Determined by need, e.g., in preparation of accreditation visits by SED, ACICS and CEA

President

January 2012

January 2014

5.2

Upgrade school connectivity to mission critical industrial strength reliability.  Assure fail-safe mechanisms, including double Internet access and backup proxy server.  Improve wireless connectivity throughout the school.  Create wireless redundancies to enlarge number of simultaneous wireless connections used by faculty, staff, and students.  Install. battery backup for office and classroom computers

Base upon consultant analysis and recommendations installed

HP ProReliant ML150G6 Unixproxy server to backup website, e-mail, and firewall gateway with built-in redundancies and triple power supplies

Apple Airport Extreme wireless hubs to support 250 connections

DSL2 line to increase bandwidth bandwidth to download speeds of up to 15 megs/second.  Splitter box installed for fail-safe switching to T-1 connection if DSL goes down

Conversion from 10-yr. old analog to digital T-1 telephony

President

Server - Spring 2010

Airport – October 2010

DSL2 – July 2011

Phone System – Summer 2011

Internal review -
        Summer 2014

External consultant review -
        Spring 2016

5.3

Renew, replace, upgrade, or obtain  instructional hardware and software

Provide permanent audio playback capabilities in all classrooms by 2011

Based upon recommendations of DAA and faculty

Hardware Upgrades
Phase-out of PCs to be replaced by 90 iMACs added to Computer Room and Library

+/-25 CD players with iPod and computer connectivity provided in each ESL classroom

Added 3 additional replacement CD playback units

Purchased three Insignia 26” flat screen HD-DVD all-in-ones for ESL course support

Purchased two iMAC computers with 27” screens

Ricoh Aficio color laser printer installed in Computer Room

Software
Adobe CS4 software purchased and installed for computer graphics courses

Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing for MAC

25 QuickBooks for MAC site licenses

President

Hardware

Computer upgrade phased between 2009 and 2011

CD players available December 2010

Insignia – October 2009

27” iMACs – June 2010

Ricoh printer         Spring 2009

 

Software

Mavis Beacon
      September 2009

Adobe CS4 - Spring 2009

 

Hardware repaired and replaced as required
(Next internal review 2014

Replace as required

 

5.4

Assess future infrastructure needs and plan for improvement

External assessment by computer consultant to identify current or  potential computer infrastructure obsolescence especially as it affects school database system and record preservation

President

February 2011

February 2016

6          To provide faculty and staff development targeted to the Institute curriculum, and instructional goals and objectives

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

6.1

Plan, schedule, and implement faculty/staff development workshops with faculty and staff input

Faculty Workshop topics

2010
Spanish-American Institute Instructional Support Material”
“What Have We Learned from NorthStar?”
”Introduction to NorthStar 3e”

2011
“CEA Standards and Self-Study”
“NorthStar: Four Skills Integration”

2012
“NorthStar’s MyEnglishLab”
“CEA Accreditation Visit”

Dean of Academic Affairs, Program Chairs and faculty

 

May 8, 2010

December 10, 2010

September 10, 2011

December 3, 2011

February 4, 2012

June 16, 2012

 

Meeting Minutes
Faculty Meeting & Workshop Minutes

Next Faculty Meeting -
     December 2012
     Topic:

6.2

Assure communication through print and on-line distribution of  faculty and staff  meetings and workshop minutes.   Maintain “Faculty Matters” section on school homepage with links to  documents relevant  to faculty and academic affairs (e.g., Handbooks, Syllabi, IEP, etc.)

Meeting minutes routinely distributed to all faculty and staff. and archived on-line since 10/07

“Faculty Matters” menu created on school website 10/07 and updated periodically

President and Dean of Academic Affairs

Meeting Minute
Faculty Meeting & Workshop Minutes

Faculty Matters
Faculty Matters

As required

6.3

Update and distribute curriculum implementation guidelines and strategies to English and program faculty

Language Skills in Computer Education manual developed 10/09

ESL Teacher Orientation:   Standards of Good Practice in ESL manual for faculty created in 2008 and updated periodically

DAA meets with new faculty individually to review Institute curriculum guidelines

Dean of Academic Affairs

Language Skills in Computer Education
English-in-Context: Teaching English in Computer Education

ESL Teacher Orientation:   Standards of Good Practice in ESL
ESL Teacher Orientation

Fall 2014

6.4

Administer  in-class “Student Evaluation of Faculty”  form and convey results to individual faculty

Survey administered by President

DAA complies data and communicates to faculty

President and Dean of Academic Affairs

 

 

6.5

Conduct individual annual professional development conferences that include review of instruction

Annual individual review

Dean of Academic Affairs

Spring 2012

Spring 2012

6.6

Maintain database about new and emerging graduate TEFL and other programs for interested faculty and staff.  Advise interested faculty and staff about available graduate programs.  Write letters of recommendation upon request

After consultation with Dean of Academic Affairs:

·  One faculty student associate completed Touro College MSIS program

·  One faculty member enrolled in Touro College MSIS program

·  One faculty member referred to and enrolled in Touro College TEFL program

Dean of Academic Affairs

Summer and Fall of 2009

 

6.7

Establish faculty and staff computer purchase program through payroll reduction

Fifteen dollars deducted each pay period

President

MAC laptops available for purchase as of February 2010

Program is ongoing

7          To provide faculty and staff development targeted to the Institute curriculum, and instructional goals and objectives

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

7.1

Administer an ESL placement test upon admissions

Faculty Student Services Associates  administer and record results on individual student records

Accreditation Self-Study Student Achievement Standards Committee reviews placement and academic progress testing

Faculty Student Services Associates

Alternative ESL placement and academic progress processes under review by the Accreditation Self-Study Student Achievement  Standard Committee starting early Fall, 2011 with recommendations expected in early 2012

Placement test replaced with CELSA (Combined English
December 2012

Language Skills Assessment)
CELSA Placement Test

Recent analysis of Level 2 ESL indicates accuracy of placement of students

CELSA results and placement continue to analyzed

First review by Student Achievement committee
     December 2012

7.2

Administer nationally-normed standardized externally developed SLEP test to assess ESL student placement and progress.  Review alternative testing instruments and processes to assess student placement and progress

Faculty Student Services Associates  administer and record results on individual student records

DAA analyzes and reports aggregate results. Student Services staff enter on student record

DDA review confirms conclusions in her analysis of 2004-2007 data indicating:

·   accurate initial student course placement in most  instances

·   aggregate test scores per ESL 3 levels and above increased from 2006 forward over previous years consistent with anticipated improved academic outcomes because of implementation of new ESL curriculum goals and instructional emphases

·   SLEP data still found most useful for individual student guidance and for aggregate assessment in ESL 3-6 and BE

·   SLEP student scores for ESL 1-2 scores consistently too low and ARW/TOEFL scores too high to yield useful information about individual student placement or progress or course assessment

Faculty Student Services Associates and Dean of Academic Affairs

Placement test replaced with CELSA (Combined English
December 2012

Language Skills Assessment)
CELSA Placement Test

Recent analysis of Level 2 ESL indicates accuracy of placement of students

CELSA results and placement continue to analyzed

First review Student Achievement committee
     December 2012

7.3

Develop formal test monitoring system to assure that tests are criterion referenced and meet standards of good practice reflected in stated measurable objectives for all ESL and non-ESL courses

Dean of Academic Affairs’ periodic review of in-class test materials indicated that  most ESL faculty using only WorldView and NorthStar companion test materials

NorthStar Building Skills for the TOEFL .  TOEFL practice tests administered in TOEFL class

Accreditation Self-Study Student Achievement Standards Committee recommendation led to formal test duplication test request form developed to facilitate test monitoring and to create data-base validating that faculty testing in accordance with standards of good practice, including integration of four language skills in all ESL and non-ESL classes

Dean of Academic Affairs, IEL Chairs and faculty

Recommended Spring 2011
Implemented Fall 2011

Teacher Exam Duplication Request Form

Process reviewed
bi-monthly in conjunction with exam periods

8          To access career program students’ academic progress

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

8.1

Institute review process for exams to assure that career course exams require demonstration of English language skills, critical thinking, and other standards of good practice consistent with stated and measurable course objective

Dean of Academic Affairs’ periodic review of in-class test materials indicated wide differences in testing standards in bi-monthly teacher generated exams

Student Achievement Standards Committee recommendation led to formal test duplication test request form developed to facilitate test monitoring and to create data-base validating that faculty testing in accordance with standards of good practice consistent with course objectives

Dean of Academic Affairs and IEL Chairs

Implemented Fall 2011

Teacher Exam Duplication Request Form

Process reviewed
bi-monthly in conjunction with exam periods

9          To secure student, academic, financial and other documents, and databases with offsite backup

No.

Tasks

Process

Responsible
Parties

Timeline / Documentation

Current Status

Next Review Period

8.1

Create off-site document and database backup

Backup individual files throughout day and financial and academic databases at night

President and Deans

Backup process created Summer 2010

Reviewed daily to ensure access is available


 

Program Development, Planning and Review
Standard 2: The program or language institution regularly reviews and revises its program components and has a plan, in writing, to guide the review of curricular elements, student assessment practices, and student services policies and activities. The plan is systematically implemented.

Rationale for appears to partially meet:

SAI has a 5-year Institutional Effectiveness Plan as required by ACICS. As an Institutional Effectiveness Plan, it is well written and complete and calls for periodic review of program components. While the Institutional Effectiveness Plan will be reviewed every five years, definite time frames for the next assessment of a given component are not clear. Generally, only the dates of the last completed review are given. For example, the Institutional Effectiveness Plan states, “Review and update ESL syllabi periodically but at least once every two years” and indicates that this was completed. However, there is no date indicating when the review took place and when it will happen again.

In addition, the discussion for this standard states, “the written plan must include the tasks, process, responsible parties, time lines as well as the documentation that provides evidence that the plan has been implemented. The SAI’s Institutional Effectiveness Plan does not describe the process for review, i.e., how the review will be done.

Other comments:

A calendar giving specific dates for the review of program components would benefit the program.

Comments: Spanish-American Institute’s five year Institutional Effectiveness Plan has been revised to include “tasks, process, responsible parties, and time lines, as well as a list of the documentation that provides evidence that the plan has been implemented.” An example of the updated IEP is found with Program Development, Planning and Review: Standard 1.

The following workshops are planned for each of the next four Faculty Meetings:

§        December 15, 2012     “Selecting a Process to Improve Our Pronunciation”

§        April 20, 2013              “Orientation – Incorporating the Program into the Curriculum"

§        August 17, 2013           "Using Rubrics to Assess Students’ Speaking and Writing Skills”

§        December 21, 2013     "Reviewing the Exit Exams on MyEnglisLab as an Assessment Tool”