spanish-american institute
215 West 43 Street ●
NYC, NY 10036 ● 212.840.7111
● fax: 212.719.5922 ●
www.sai2000.org ●
info@sai2000.org http://www.facebook.com/studentclub
To: All Faculty and Staff ~ «FirstNAME» «LastNAME»
From: Dante V. Ferraro, President
Intensive English Language and Business Department Chairs
Re: Classroom Observations
Date: January 10, 2012
Classroom Observations
In the next few weeks, Department Chairs and their associates will conduct classroom observations. Copies of the observation forms used in English/ESL and non-ESL classes are attached.
The criteria for teaching observations criteria are based on the Institute’s Standards of Good Practice in ESL Teaching and the Institute’s English-in-Context: Teaching English in Computer Education. Given the school’s primary emphasis on teaching English language skills in all classes, non-ESL faculty as well as ESL/English faculty should review these standards.
This is to be a constructive, collegial activity during which we are able to work together to improve the quality of instruction in all our classes.
Annual Professional Development
Plans
Following the observation, we will schedule a meeting to discuss the observation and to update your an annual professional development plan.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you
Associated Documents: (some attached, some you have received already, some will follow --- al available on the web @ www.sai2000.org)
English
Class Observation Form
Non-ESL
Class Observation Form
Standards of Good Practice in ESL Teaching
English-in-Context:
Teaching English in Computer Education
Spanish-American Institute
English Class Teaching Observation
2012
Faculty Member: «FirstNAME» «LastNAME» |
|
|
Course & Time: ESL |
Observation Date: |
Number of Students Present: |
Observer: |
Observer's Signature: |
Rating
Scale: 1=unsatisfactory, 2=needs
improvement, 3=satisfactory, 4=very good, 5=excellent, NA/NO-not applicable or
not observed
CONTENT |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
Used content appropriate to the syllabus and the assigned textbook
according to the Institute’s Standards
of Good Practice in ESL Teaching. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used content appropriate to the lesson. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used content appropriate to the class. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related material to prior knowledge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated command of subject matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explained items clearly and effectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assigned appropriate homework. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORGANIZATION and
INSTRUCTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|
Explained purpose of lesson clearly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated evidence of lesson planning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic writing activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic reading activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic listening activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic speaking activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used effective transitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used active learning strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used varied teaching strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used class time effectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discouraged "bitting.” (*Bitting=accepting little bits of answers instead of
encouraging full sentence responses that demonstrate understanding of the
question.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kept teacher’s “voice” to a minimum so that the primary speakers were
students engaged in active communication with each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowed wait-time for question responses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involved several students in each question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arranged classroom effectively to encourage
student communication with each other (not from student to teacher). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used blackboard sparingly, if at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involved everyone in the class. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communicated expectations clearly to students, including
participation levels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collected homework and provided feedback. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTOR-STUDENT INTERACTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
Created a student-centered classroom, not a
teacher-centered one. (In a student-centered classroom, the teacher
facilitates learning through the use of active teaching strategies that
requires student engagement with each
other.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addressed students by name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required students to engage in answering their own questions.
(Did not allow student
questions to divert attention away from the lesson.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encouraged student interaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moved around the classroom. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observed individual student work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determined when students were confused |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helped students who needed assistance but did not provide them with
the “answers.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provided students with positive feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held students' attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Faculty Member’s Signature:
_________________________________Date___________________
«FirstNAME» «LastNAME»
Observer's
Signature: _____________________________
Date: _______________
Spanish-American Institute
Non-ESL Course Teaching Observation
2012
rev. 20110901
Faculty Member: «FirstNAME»
«LastNAME» |
|
|
Course & Time: |
Observation Date: |
Number of Students Present: |
Observer: |
|
Rating
Scale: 1=unsatisfactory, 2=needs
improvement, 3=satisfactory, 4=very good, 5=excellent, NA/NO-not applicable or
not observed
CONTENT |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|
||||||
Used content from the textbook unit and content appropriate to the syllabus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated objectives with primary attention to using English
language skills. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated unit’s application objectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated “Critical Thinking” activity (or equivalent if
not using DDC text). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated “On Your Own” activity (or equivalent if not using DDC text as
required by textbook and syllabus). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated “Online Resources” research (or equivalent if not
using DDC text as required by textbook and syllabus) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated final project development. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
ORGANIZATION and
INSTRUCTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|||||||
Demonstrated evidence of lesson planning consistent with the
syllabus and with student needs with primary attention to incorporation of
English language skills objectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Facilitated student learning instead of giving students the
answers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in reading for comprehension. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in paraphrasing (explaining textbook sections
orally and/or in writing). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in summarizing directions orally and/or in
writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in writing activity connected with developing
“On Your Own” activity and individual projects (or equivalent if not using
DDC text as required by textbook and syllabus). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in speaking activity connected with
developing “On Your Own” activity and individual projects (or equivalent if
not using DDC text as required by textbook and syllabus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Determined when students were confused. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Encouraged student questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Moved around the classroom and observed each student's work at
least once each class period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Kept daily or weekly written summaries of each student’s academic
progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Took attendance while students were engaged in learning
activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
INSTRUCTOR-STUDENT INTERACTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|
||||||
Made effective eye contact and addressed students by name. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Communicated expectations clearly to students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Held students' attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Had good rapport overall with students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Observer’s Signature and Date:
____________________________________________
Faculty Member’s Signature and Date: ______________________________________
«FirstNAME» «LastNAME»