spanish-american institute
215 West 43 Street ●
NYC, NY 10036 ● 212.840.7111
● fax: 212.719.5922 ●
www.sai2000.org ●
info@sai2000.org http://www.facebook.com/studentclub
To: All Faculty and Staff ~ «FirstNAME» «LastNAME»
From: Dante V. Ferraro, President
Caryn T. Davis , Dean of Academic Affairs
Department Chairs
Re: Classroom Observations
Date: April 2013
Classroom Observations
In the next few weeks, Department Chairs and their associates will conduct classroom observations. Copies of the observation forms used in English/ESL and non-ESL classes are attached.
The criteria for teaching observations criteria are based on the Institute’s Standards of Good Practice in ESL Teaching and the Institute’s English-in-Context: Teaching English in Computer Education. Given the school’s primary emphasis on teaching English language skills, all faculty should review these standards.
This is to be a constructive, collegial activity during which we are able to work together to improve the quality of instruction in all our classes.
Annual Professional Development
Plans
Following the observation, we will schedule a meeting to discuss the observation and to update your an annual professional development plan.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you
Associated Documents available on the web @ www.sai2000.org
English
Class Observation Form
Non-ESL
Class Observation Form
Standards of Good Practice in ESL Teaching
English-in-Context:
Teaching English in Computer Education
Spanish-American Institute
English Class Teaching Observation
Spring 2013
Faculty Member: «FirstNAME» «LastNAME» |
|
|
Course & Time: ESL |
Observation Date: |
Number of Students Present:
|
Observer: |
Observer's Signature: |
9:15 |
10:10 |
11:05 |
12 |
1 |
1:55 |
2:50 |
4 |
5 |
5:51 |
6:42 |
7:33 |
8:24 |
«nine15» |
«ten10» |
«eleven05» |
«twelve» |
«one» |
«two50» |
«two50» |
«four» |
«five» |
«five51» |
«six42» |
«seven33» |
«eight24» |
Rating
Scale: 1=unsatisfactory, 2=needs
improvement, 3=satisfactory, 4=very good, 5=excellent, NA/NO-not applicable or
not observed
CONTENT |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
Used content appropriate to the syllabus and the assigned textbook
according to the Institute’s Standards
of Good Practice in ESL Teaching. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used content appropriate to the lesson. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used content appropriate to the class. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related material to prior knowledge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated command of subject matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explained items clearly and effectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assigned appropriate homework. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORGANIZATION and
INSTRUCTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|
Explained purpose of lesson clearly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated evidence of lesson planning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic writing activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic reading activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic listening activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engaged class in holistic speaking activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used effective transitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used active learning strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used varied teaching strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used class time effectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discouraged "bitting.” (*Bitting=accepting little bits of answers instead of
encouraging full sentence responses that demonstrate understanding of the
question.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kept teacher’s “voice” to a minimum so that the primary speakers were
students engaged in active communication with each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowed wait-time for question responses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involved several students in each question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arranged classroom effectively to encourage
student communication with each other (not from student to teacher). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used blackboard sparingly, if at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involved everyone in the class. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communicated expectations clearly to students, including participation
levels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collected homework and provided feedback. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTOR-STUDENT INTERACTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
Created a student-centered classroom, not a
teacher-centered one. (In a student-centered classroom, the teacher
facilitates learning through the use of active teaching strategies that
requires student engagement with each
other.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addressed students by name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required students to engage in answering their own questions. (Did
not allow student questions to divert attention away from the lesson.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encouraged student interaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moved around the classroom. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observed individual student work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determined when students were confused |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helped students who needed assistance but did not provide them with
the “answers.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provided students with positive feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held students' attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Faculty Member’s Signature:
_________________________________Date___________________
«FirstNAME» «LastNAME»
Observer's
Signature:
_____________________________ Date: _______________
Spanish-American Institute
Non-ESL Course Teaching Observation
Spring 2013
rev. 20110901
Faculty Member: «FirstNAME»
«LastNAME» |
|
|
Course & Time:
|
Observation Date: |
Number of Students Present: |
Observer: |
|
9:15 |
10:10 |
11:05 |
12 |
1 |
1:55 |
2:50 |
4 |
5 |
5:51 |
6:42 |
7:33 |
8:24 |
«nine15» |
«ten10» |
«eleven05» |
«twelve» |
«one» |
«two50» |
«two50» |
«four» |
«five» |
«five51» |
«six42» |
«seven33» |
«eight24» |
Rating
Scale: 1=unsatisfactory, 2=needs
improvement, 3=satisfactory, 4=very good, 5=excellent, NA/NO-not applicable or
not observed
CONTENT |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|
||||||
Used content from the textbook unit and content appropriate to the syllabus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated unit’s application objectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated “Critical Thinking” activity (or equivalent if
not using DDC text). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated “On Your Own” activity (or equivalent if not using DDC text as
required by textbook and syllabus). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated “Online Resources” research (or equivalent if not
using DDC text as required by textbook and syllabus) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Incorporated final project development. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
ORGANIZATION and
INSTRUCTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|||||||
Demonstrated evidence of lesson planning consistent with the
syllabus and with student needs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Facilitated student learning instead of giving students the
answers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in reading for comprehension. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in paraphrasing (explaining textbook sections
orally and/or in writing). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in summarizing directions orally and/or in
writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in writing activity connected with developing
“On Your Own” activity and individual projects (or equivalent if not using
DDC text as required by textbook and syllabus). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Engaged students in speaking activity connected with
developing “On Your Own” activity and individual projects (or equivalent if
not using DDC text as required by textbook and syllabus) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Determined when students were confused. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Encouraged student questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Moved around the classroom and observed each student's work at
least once each class period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Kept daily or weekly written summaries of each student’s academic
progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Took attendance while students were engaged in learning
activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
INSTRUCTOR-STUDENT INTERACTION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NA/NO |
|
||||||
Made effective eye contact and addressed students by name. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Communicated expectations clearly to students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Held students' attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Had good rapport overall with students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
SUMMARY and RECOMMENDATIONS:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Observer’s Signature and Date:
____________________________________________
Faculty Member’s Signature and Date: ______________________________________
«FirstNAME» «LastNAME»